Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Neurological Medicine
Volume 2015, Article ID 204387, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/204387
Case Report

Extraintracranial Bypass as a Rescue Therapy for Symptomatic Flow Diverter Thrombosis

1Department of Neuroscience and Surgery of the Nervous System, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
2Department of Neuroradiology, Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy
3Department of Anesthesiology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy

Received 4 August 2015; Accepted 6 September 2015

Academic Editor: Chin-Chang Huang

Copyright © 2015 Luigi A. Lanterna et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. I. D'Urso, G. Lanzino, H. J. Cloft, and D. F. Kallmes, “Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a review,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 2363–2368, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Raymond, T. E. Darsaut, F. Guilbert, A. Weill, and D. Roy, “Flow diversion in aneurysms trial: the design of the FIAT study,” Interventional Neuroradiology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 147–153, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Lanzino, “Editorial: flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 405–406, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Briganti, M. Napoli, F. Tortora et al., “Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complicationsa—a retrospective data analysis,” Neuroradiology, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 1145–1152, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. Brinjikji, M. H. Murad, G. Lanzino, H. J. Cloft, and D. F. Kallmes, “Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis,” Stroke, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 442–447, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. The EC/IC Bypass Study Group, “Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 313, no. 19, pp. 1191–1200, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. D. H. Sahlein, M. Fouladvand, T. Becske et al., “Neuroophthalmological outcomes associated with use of the Pipeline Embolization Device: analysis of the PUFS trial results,” Journal of Neurosurgery, In press.
  8. A. A. Abla, H. A. Zaidi, R. W. Crowley et al., “Optic chiasm compression from mass effect and thrombus formation following unsuccessful treatment of a giant supraclinoid ICA aneurysm with the Pipeline device: open surgical bailout with STA-MCA bypass and parent vessel occlusion,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Grossberg, F. Tong, C. Cawley, and Dion, “Safety and efficacy of flow diverter treatment for carotid-ophtalmic aneurysms,” Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, vol. 6, supplement 1, pp. A55–A56, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Berge, A. Biondi, P. Machi et al., “Flow-diverter silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1150–1155, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. V. Byrne, R. Beltechi, J. A. Yarnold, J. Birks, and M. Kamran, “Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 9, Article ID e12492, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Piano, L. Valvassori, L. Quilici, G. Pero, and E. Boccardi, “Midterm and long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: a single-center experience,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 408–416, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. I. Szikora, Z. Berentei, Z. Kulcsar et al., “Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1139–1147, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Kubica, M. Kasprzak, J. Siller-Matula et al., “Time-related changes in determinants of antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in patients after myocardial infarction,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 742, pp. 47–54, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. W. J. Powers, W. R. Clarke, R. L. Grubb Jr., T. O. Videen, H. P. Adams Jr., and C. P. Derdeyn, “Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia: the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study randomized trial,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 306, no. 18, pp. 1983–1992, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Becske, D. F. Kallmes, I. Saatci et al., “Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial,” Radiology, vol. 267, no. 3, pp. 858–868, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. S. Nussbaum, T. M. Janjua, A. Defillo, J. L. Lowary, and L. A. Nussbaum, “Emergency extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for acute ischemic stroke,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 666–673, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus