Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Neurological Medicine
Volume 2018, Article ID 2548528, 4 pages
Case Report

Nivolumab-Induced Autoimmune Encephalitis in Two Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma

1Duke University Department of Neurology, USA
2Duke University Departments of Neurology and Orthopedic Surgery, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Suma Shah; ude.ekud@hahs.amus

Received 28 February 2018; Accepted 13 June 2018; Published 4 July 2018

Academic Editor: Dominic B. Fee

Copyright © 2018 Suma Shah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved patient survival outcomes in a variety of advanced malignancies. However, they can cause a number of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) through lymphocyte dysregulation. Central nervous system (CNS) irAEs are rare, but as the number of indications for checkpoint inhibitors increases, there has been emergence of CNS immune-mediated disease among cancer patients. Given the relatively recent recognition of checkpoint inhibitor CNS irAEs, there is no standard treatment, and prognosis is variable. Therefore, there is a great need for further study of checkpoint inhibitor-induced CNS irAEs. Here, we present two unique cases of nivolumab-induced autoimmune encephalitis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and review the available literature.

1. Introduction

Immune checkpoints are built-in regulatory mechanisms of the adaptive immune system that function to maintain self-tolerance and attenuate physiologic immune responses [1]. Tumors can evade immune surveillance by manipulating immune checkpoints to establish more favorable environments for their growth [2]. Landmark clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA4) and the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway have demonstrated improved survival rates in a variety of advanced malignancies [3].

Although checkpoint inhibitors have proven efficacy and are welcomed alternatives to traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, they can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to their interference with lymphocyte regulation. Commonly described irAEs include rash, pruritus, colitis, hepatitis, and various endocrinopathies, such as thyroiditis and hypophysitis [4]. Neurologic irAEs are far less frequent and most often involve the peripheral nervous system [5, 6]. Here, we present two unique cases of central nervous system (CNS) irAEs following treatment with PD-1 inhibitor, nivolumab.

2. Case 1

A 66-year-old Caucasian woman with stage IIIb lung adenocarcinoma developed right hemiballismus and dysarthria following four months of nivolumab administration. The hemiballismus then evolved to bilateral ballismus in all extremities over a two-week period. Neurologic examination revealed hypophonic and dysarthric speech, orobuccolingual dyskinesias, and severe bilateral arm and leg ballismus.

Initial brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without gadolinium showed symmetric T2 hyperintense and T1 hypointense basal ganglia abnormalities [Figures 1(a) and 1(b)]. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis demonstrated a normal cell count and glucose level, a mildly elevated protein concentration of 56mg/dL (15-50mg/dL), and negative cytology. There were 16 oligoclonal bands present in the CSF compared to 2 in the serum. A CSF paraneoplastic antibody assay revealed a novel, unclassified antibody. A repeat brain MRI three weeks later redemonstrated symmetric T2 hyperintense basal ganglia but with a transition to T1 hyperintensities in the same location [Figures 1(c) and 1(d)].

Figure 1: Initial and follow-up MRI brain for Case    1. (a) Initial MRI: axial T2-weighted image with hyperintensities in the bilateral basal ganglia. (b) Initial MRI: coronal FLAIR-weighted image with hyperintensities in the bilateral basal ganglia. (c) Follow-up MRI: axial FLAIR-weighted image with hyperintensities in the bilateral basal ganglia. (d) Follow-up MRI: axial T1-weighted image with hyperintensities in the bilateral basal ganglia.

Despite the consensus of an immune-mediated etiology, the patient was refractory to 5 days of intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone (1000mg/day) and 5 plasma exchanges. Haloperidol and olanzapine also did not offer symptomatic relief. She continued to decline despite subsequent trials of IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) (total dose of 2.5g/kg), prednisone, rituximab (1000mg once), and tetrabenazine (20mg, 3x/day). Due to continued clinical decline, she was eventually transitioned to comfort-only care and inpatient hospice.

3. Case 2

A 44-year-old Caucasian woman with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) diagnosed at age 30 and stage IV lung adenocarcinoma treated with 5 cycles of nivolumab (3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks) developed several days of progressive altered mental status, nausea, and vomiting. She then presented to the emergency department following a first time seizure. Upon initial evaluation, she exhibited abnormal tongue movements, inappropriate laughter, and rhythmic movements of her right arm that improved with lorazepam.

An electroencephalogram revealed left temporal slowing and frequent interictal discharges. Brain MRI with and without gadolinium demonstrated T2 signal hyperintensities of the bilateral mesial temporal lobes compatible with limbic encephalitis. Additionally, there were 2 enhancing foci within the left occipital and right temporal lobes, concerning for metastatic disease [Figure 2]. CSF analysis detected 19 nucleated cells (97% lymphocytes) and normal protein and glucose levels. There were 7 oligoclonal bands in the CSF and 3 in the serum. CSF cytology was negative. A CSF autoimmune encephalitis panel (Mayo Medical Laboratories) demonstrated the presence of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65-isoform (GAD65) antibodies: 2.70nmol/L (<= 0.02nmol/L). Serum GAD65 antibodies were also detected: 275nmol/L (<= 0.02nmol/L).

Figure 2: MRI brain imaging for Case    2. (a) MRI brain FLAIR imaging. This image demonstrates mildly expansile T2 signal hyperintensity of the left greater than right mesial temporal lobes. Additional small regions of cortical and subcortical T2 signal hyperintensity are noted in the temporal lobes of both hemispheres. (b) MRI brain, T1 sequence with contrast. There is no enhancement noted in the affected areas after administration of gadolinium contrast.

The patient was diagnosed with GAD65 antibody positive autoimmune encephalitis. She received IV methylprednisolone (1000mg/day) for 5 days followed by 5 plasma exchanges. However, she continued to experience refractory seizures despite treatment with multiple antiepileptic drugs and developed worsening ataxia, vertigo, and gait impairment. Therefore, she was given IV rituximab (1000mg) during the hospitalization. Upon discharge, seizures were under control and mental status improved. The patient currently receives maintenance rituximab (1000mg) every 6 months and remains seizure-free but with severe residual vertigo and moderate gait ataxia. Her most recent brain MRI demonstrated interval resolution of enhancing foci and abnormal T2 signal in the temporal lobes [Figure 2]. Following discontinuation of nivolumab, she was transitioned to brigatinib (a multikinase inhibitor with activity against anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) as well as EGFR deletions and point mutations) for lung cancer treatment and remains oncologically stable.

4. Discussion

Systemic irAEs secondary to immune checkpoint blockade are a well-recognized phenomenon. Most systemic irAEs are successfully managed by discontinuing the offending agent alone or in combination with temporary immunosuppressive therapy such as corticosteroids and/or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors [4]. In contrast, neurological irAEs occur less frequently, estimated in < 1% of individuals receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. They can have more aggressive clinical courses and often involve the peripheral nervous system, especially the neuromuscular junction [6, 7]. In fact, clinical trial data indicate that autoimmune encephalitis occurs in as few as 0.1 to <1% of patients receiving checkpoint inhibition [8].

To the best of our knowledge, our cases represent the first descriptions of nivolumab-induced autoimmune encephalitis manifesting as choreiform movements as well as a GAD65 antibody positive autoimmune encephalitis. Each case entailed an aggressive neurological disease course, with the patient in the former case ultimately succumbing to the irAE. This is particularly troubling because development of nivolumab-induced irAEs in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may predict a favorable oncologic treatment response [9].

It is to be determined whether these cases represent checkpoint inhibitor-induced de novo autoimmunity or the unmasking of a preexisting subclinical disorder. In oncology, the study of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling has largely focused on PD-L1 expression within the tumor microenvironment resulting in PD-1+T-lymphocyte inhibition and subsequent tumor escape. However, the role of PD-1/PD-L1 interactions extends beyond cell-mediated immunity and into humoral immunity. Specifically, PD-1+ follicular helper T cells ( cells) are critical for germinal center function and antibody production. It was recently demonstrated that PD-L1+ regulatory B cells negatively regulate cells and thus attenuate humoral responses [10]. Therefore, it is possible that disruption of the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction at the level of the germinal center may have led to the de novo formation of aberrantly directed antibodies to self-antigens found in the CNS.

We suspect that the patient in Case 2, who was a known type 1 diabetic before developing nivolumab-associated GAD65 autoimmune encephalitis, was already at risk for developing CNS autoimmunity. As GAD65 is located on both pancreatic islet cells and CNS gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA-ergic) neurons, there is an association between GAD65 antibody positive CNS autoimmune disease and DM1. Antibodies against GAD65 are detectable in roughly 70-80% of individuals with DM1 but typically at lower titers than in individuals who have coexisting neurologic autoimmunity [11, 12]. If the patient had preexisting GAD65 antibodies, it is plausible that nivolumab exposure simply exacerbated her condition. If more GAD65 antibody positive CNS autoimmunity are reported in patients with type 1 diabetes following immune checkpoint blockade, then screening for preexisting GAD65 antibodies prior to cancer immunotherapy may be clinically useful.

As the development of irAEs from nivolumab in patients with NSCLC has been correlated with improved cancer-related outcomes it is crucial to aggressively manage irAEs as well as supporting patients through the acute immune-mediated illness so they can continue with appropriate cancer treatment. Unlike the more common systemic irAEs, CNS irAEs are rare, and, therefore, optimal treatment is not as well established. In addition to establishing more efficacious treatments for CNS irAEs, developing biomarkers to predict risk of developing CNS irAEs is also warranted.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Dr. Shah and Dr. Dunn-Pirio were responsible for acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, and drafting the manuscript for intellectual content. Dr. Luedke was responsible for analysis and interpretation. Dr. Morgenlander was responsible for study concept and design. Dr. Skeen was responsible for study concept and design and study supervision. Dr. Eckstein was responsible for critical revisions of the manuscript for important intellectual content and study supervision. Drs. Shah and Dunn-Pirio contributed equally to the manuscript.


Dr. Skeen has received honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Celgene, and Mallinckrodt.


  1. D. M. Pardoll, “The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 252–264, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. Diesendruck and I. Benhar, “Novel immune check point inhibiting antibodies in cancer therapy—Opportunities and challenges,” Drug Resistance Updates, vol. 30, pp. 39–47, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. A. M. Wilson, T. R. J. Evans, A. R. Fraser, and R. J. B. Nibbs, “Immune checkpoint inhibitors: New strategies to checkmate cancer,” Clinical & Experimental Immunology, vol. 191, pp. 133–148, 2018. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. A. Postow, R. Sidlow, and M. D. Hellmann, “Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 378, no. 2, pp. 158–168, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Naidoo, D. B. Page, B. T. Li et al., “Toxicities of the anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint antibodies,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2375–2391, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Makarious, K. Horwood, and J. I. G. Coward, “Myasthenia gravis: An emerging toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 82, pp. 128–136, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Larkin, B. Chmielowski, C. D. Lao et al., “Neurologic serious adverse events associated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in advanced melanoma, including a case series of encephalitis,” The Oncologist, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 709–718, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Schneider, S. Potthast, P. Komminoth, G. Schwegler, and S. Böhm, “PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor associated autoimmune encephalitis,” Case Reports in Oncology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 473–478, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Sato, H. Akamatsu, E. Murakami et al., “Correlation between immune-related adverse events and efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab,” Lung Cancer, vol. 115, pp. 71–74, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. R. Khan, E. Hams, A. Floudas, T. Sparwasser, C. T. Weaver, and P. G. Fallon, “PD-L1hi B cells are critical regulators of humoral immunity,” Nature Communications, vol. 6, article no. 5997, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. McKeon and J. A. Tracy, “GAD65 neurological autoimmunity,” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 15–27, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. L. Notkins and Å. Lernmark, “Autoimmune type 1 diabetes: Resolved and unresolved issues,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 108, no. 9, pp. 1247–1252, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus