Case Report

Early Aggressive Immunotherapy Improves Functional Outcome in Chronic Immune Sensory Polyradiculopathy

Table 3

Initial and repeat (performed 4 months apart) nerve conduction study parameters.

Sensory nerve conduction

Right median nerve (antidromic)Right ulnar nerve (antidromic)
InitialRepeatNormal limit∗InitialRepeatNormal limit
Peak latency (ms)3.63.2<3.93.03.0<3.0
Amplitude (µV)3526>142023>9.0
Velocity (m/s)5055>505051>50
Right sural (antidromic)
InitialRepeatNormal limit∗
Peak latency (ms)3.83.7<4.5
Amplitude (µV)78>7.0
Velocity (m/s)4849>40

Motor nerve conduction^

Right median nerve (antidromic)Right ulnar nerve (antidromic)
InitialRepeatNormal limit∗InitialRepeatNormal limit∗
Distal latency (ms)3.7<4.52.9<3.0
Amplitudes (mV) (distal/proximal)7.7/6.6#>5.511.1/9.5#>7.0
Velocity (m/s)50>5056>50
F-wave latency (ms)26.222–3227.421–29
Right tibial nerve (antidromic)
InitialRepeatNormal limit∗
Distal latency (ms)4.6<4.6
Amplitudes (mV) (distal/proximal)8.7/7.9#>5.0
Velocity (m/s)40>42
F-wave latency (ms)47.838–52

∗Normative data derived from 245 age-height matched controls; #measurements following stimulation at the wrist/antecubital fossa for median nerve, at the wrist/above elbow for ulnar nerve, and at the ankle/popliteal fossa for tibial nerve; ^repeat motor nerve conduction study was not performed as the patient had no motor deficits.