Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2015, Article ID 235312, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/235312
Case Report

Pregnancy after Uterine Artery Embolization: A Case Report in a Woman with Leiomyomata

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal

Received 20 November 2014; Accepted 21 January 2015

Academic Editor: Olivier Picone

Copyright © 2015 Helena Isabel Lopes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Pron, E. Mocarski, J. Bennett, G. Vilos, A. Common, and L. Vanderburgh, “Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: the ontario multicenter trial,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. Firouznia, H. Ghanaati, A. H. Jalali, and M. Shakiba, “Uterine artery embolization for treatment of symptomatic fibroids: a review of the evidence,” Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, vol. 15, no. 12, Article ID e16699, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, “Uterine fibroid embolization—SOGC clinical practice guidelines,” Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 899–911, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. Goldberg, L. Pereira, and V. Berghella, “Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 100, no. 5, part 1, pp. 869–872, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. McLucas, “Pregnancy following uterine artery embolization: an update,” Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. W. J. Walker and S. J. McDowell, “Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: a series of 56 completed pregnancies,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 195, no. 5, pp. 1266–1277, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. T. Carpenter and W. J. Walker, “Pregnancy following uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: a series of 26 completed pregnancies,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 321–325, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. I. Qidwai, A. B. Caughey, and A. F. Jacoby, “Obstetric outcomes in women with sonographically identified uterine leiomyomata,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 107, no. 2, part 1, pp. 376–382, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. Homer and E. Saridogan, “Uterine artery embolization for fibroids is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 324–330, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Lopera, R. Suri, G. M. Kroma, A. Garza-Berlanga, and J. Thomas, “Role of interventional procedures in obstetrics/gynecology,” Radiologic Clinics of North America, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1049–1066, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus