Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 865821, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/865821
Case Report

Didelphys Uterus: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center, Bronx, NY 10451, USA
2St. George’s University, School of Medicine, St. George’s, Grenada

Received 21 May 2015; Revised 20 July 2015; Accepted 21 July 2015

Academic Editor: Erich Cosmi

Copyright © 2015 Shadi Rezai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. K. Heinonen, “Uterus didelphys: a report of 26 cases,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 345–350, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  2. P. K. Heinonen, “Clinical implications of the didelphic uterus: long-term follow-up of 49 cases,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 183–190, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. F. Raga, C. Bauset, J. Remohi, F. Bonilla-Musoles, C. Simón, and A. Pellicer, “Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies,” Human Reproduction, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2277–2281, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. G. F. Grimbizis, M. Camus, B. C. Tarlatzis, J. N. Bontis, and P. Devroey, “Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 161–174, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Acién, “Reproductive performance of women with uterine malformations,” Human Reproduction, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 122–126, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  6. Uterus Didelphys, When Things go wrong: Congenital anomalies, A section from the pathology teaching Slides, University of Cape Town 2011, http://www.digitalpathology.uct.ac.za/topics/congenital_anomalies/uterus.html.
  7. T. M. Chandler, L. S. Machan, P. L. Cooperberg, A. C. Harris, and S. D. Chang, “Müllerian duct anomalies: from diagnosis to intervention,” The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 82, no. 984, pp. 1034–1042, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. A. J. Madureira, C. M. Mariz, J. C. Bernardes, and I. M. Ramos, “Case 94: uterus didelphys with obstructing hemivaginal septum and ipsilateral renal agenesis,” Radiology, vol. 239, no. 2, pp. 602–606, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. C. Buttram Jr. and W. E. Gibbons, “Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (An analysis of 144 cases),” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. Woelfer, R. Salim, S. Banerjee, J. Elson, L. Regan, and D. Jurkovic, “Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 1099–1103, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. The American Fertility Society, “The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 944–955, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  12. F. Raga, F. Bonilla-Musoles, J. Blanes, and N. G. Osborne, “Congenital Müllerian anomalies: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 523–528, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Takagi, K. Matsunami, K. Noda, T. Furui, and A. Imai, “Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluating of double uterus and associated urinary tract anomalies: a report of five cases,” Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 525–527, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Martínez-Beltrán, J. Giménez, and P. Acién, “Uterus didelphys with septate cervix and unilateral endometrial carcinoma: a case report,” Journal of Genital System & Disorders, vol. 1, article 1, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. H. W. Jones Jr., “Reproductive impairment and the malformed uterus,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 137–148, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Ludmir, P. Samuels, S. Brooks, and M. T. Mennuti, “Pregnancy outcome of patients with uncorrected uterine anomalies managed in a high-risk obstetric setting,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 906–910, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  17. H. Lewenthal, Y. Biale, and N. Ben-Adereth, “Uterus didelphys with a pregnancy in each horn. Case case report,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 155–156, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. Garg, A. Kwatra, and V. Bangal, “A rare case of uterus didelphys with full term pregnancy in each horn,” Pravara Medical Review, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 22–24, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Mashiach, Z. Ben Rafael, J. Dor, and D. M. Serr, “Triplet pregnancy in uterus didelphys with delivery interval of 72 days,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 519–521, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Nohara, M. Nakayama, H. Masamoto, K. Nakazato, K. Sakumoto, and K. Kanazawa, “Twin pregnancy in each half of a uterus didelphys with a delivery interval of 66 days,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 331–332, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. Zhang, Y. Y. Zhao, and J. Qiao, “Obstetric outcome of women with uterine anomalies in China,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 418–422, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  22. I. Maneschi, F. Maneschi, M. Parlato, G. Fucà, and S. Incandela, “Reproductive performance in women with uterus didelphys,” Acta Europaea Fertilitatis, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 121–124, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  23. C. Magudapathi, “Uterus didelphys with longitudinal vaginal septum: normal deliver—case report,” Journal of Clinical Case Reports, vol. 2, article 13, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Suthar, R. Choudhary, and S. Dadhich, “Rupture uterus in pregnancy with didelphys uterus: a rare case report,” Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 149–150, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. Altwerger, A. M. Pritchard, J. D. Black, and A. K. Sfakianaki, “Uterine didelphys and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 157–159, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. A. Stanislavsky, Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome (HWW), 2015, http://radiopaedia.org/articles/herlyn-werner-wunderlich-syndrome.
  27. C. C. Lin, A. C. Chen, and T. Y. Chen, “Double uterus with an obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis: report of 5 cases and a review of the literature,” Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 195–201, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  28. L. Karaca, B. Pirimoglu, U. Bayraktutan, H. Ogul, A. Oral, and M. Kantarci, “Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome: a very rare urogenital anomaly in a teenage girl,” The Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. e73–e75, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. T. H. Wu, T. T. Wu, Y. Y. Ng et al., “Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome consisting of uterine didelphys, obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis in a newborn,” Pediatrics & Neonatology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 68–71, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar