Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology / 2019 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 4980610 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4980610

Anastasia A. Salame, Mohammad J. Jaffal, Marco A. Mouanness, Amal R. Nasser Eddin, Labib M. Ghulmiyyah, "Unexplained First Trimester Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review", Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 2019, Article ID 4980610, 4 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4980610

Unexplained First Trimester Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Academic Editor: Maria Grazia Porpora
Received28 Jun 2019
Accepted30 Sep 2019
Published27 Dec 2019

Abstract

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a condition that usually affects the 3rd trimester-pregnant women and is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. We present a 31-year-old G2P1 patient with symptoms of ICP as early as 10 weeks of gestation (WG). Her pruritis was initially attributed to eczema. Due to the intensity of her discomfort and failure of topical treatment, ICP was suspected, total bile acid salt levels were taken and ursodeoxycholic acid was subsequently started at 18 WG. The patient was followed closely during her pregnancy to adjust the dose of the medication accordingly. Induction of labor was performed at 37 WG without complications. This case demonstrated the importance of clinical suspicion in the setting of such symptomatology in order not to miss or delay treatment of threatening conditions such as ICP.

1. Introduction

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a suspected endocrino-metabolic disease that affects pregnant women usually during the third trimester of pregnancy when the sex steroids reach their highest levels. While its maternal repercussions are somehow limited to minor symptoms of pruritis and related discomfort, pregnancy outcomes might be severely affected. Preterm labor and delivery, fetal hypoxia, and intra-uterine fetal demise (IUFD) are well known complications of ICP that has driven guidelines to recommend induction of labor during the early third trimester period [1]. The overall estimated rate of adverse pregnancy events ranges between 19.2% and 64.1% [2]. The exact pathophysiology of ICP leading to the accumulation of bile acid, the increasing serum liver enzymes, and the unfavorable pregnancy outcomes, remains unknown [2, 3].

Suggested risk factors for ICP include elevated estrogen levels, genetic causes, ethnicity, anticardiolipin antibodies, hepatitis C infection, multiple pregnancies, pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technologies as well as a personal history ICP [2, 46].

The diagnosis of ICP is made by the documentation of elevated bile acid serum levels (≥10 micro-mol/L). Depending on the serum bile acid levels, ICP can be classified as either mild (10 and 40 micro-mol/L, with the usual symptom of itching) or severe (>40 micro-mol/L, or concomitant gestational hypertension, IUFD and/or recurrent ICP) [7, 8].

ICP is considered as a disease of the third and/or late second trimester; however, recent evidence suggests that in rare situations ICP can be diagnosed as early as the first trimester. Numerous studies have suggested a link between the gestational age at which ICP was diagnosed and the pregnancy outcomes (increased risks of preterm delivery, small for gestational age, and stillbirth with earlier onset types of ICP) [9, 10]. We present a case of severe ICP in a spontaneous first trimester pregnancy with a successful outcome.

2. Case Report

A 31-year-old G2P1A0L1 presented to our clinic for follow up at 20 weeks of gestation with the diagnosis of ICP. The patient reported that her symptoms started as early as 10 weeks of gestation of her spontaneously conceived pregnancy. Initially the patient used topical steroids in an attempt to relieve her symptoms to no avail. She later sought medical attention from several dermatologists who prescribed creams for eczema and dermatitis that included lotions, antihistamines and oral steroids reaching 40 mg daily also to no avail. Despite two weeks of treatment the pruritis increased in severity and at this point ICP was suspected for which total bile acid salts TBAS as well as liver function tests were ordered. The patient discontinued her previous medications and was started prophylactically on ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) at a dose of 250 mg TID. At 18 weeks of gestation the results of her laboratory tests showed an increase in TBAS of 9.1. At this point the patient was referred to a maternal fetal medicine specialist at our center.

At our clinic, the patient was followed every 3 weeks with out-patient clinic visits until 33 weeks of gestation and then weekly afterwards. Nonstress tests were performed twice weekly as of 28 WG and follow up growth scans at 2-3 week intervals. The estimated fetal weight was within 50th percentile range at all times. The levels of TBAS were measured every 3 weeks. Her UDCA doses were modified depending on her serum bile salt values. The patients’ TBAS values are presented in Figure 1.

By the end of her pregnancy she was receiving 2000 mg daily of UDCA with mild tolerable symptoms. Her liver function tests were within the normal limits at all times during pregnancy. SGOT values ranged between 13 and 20 U/L, SGPT values ranged between 8 and 14 U/L, while bilirubin was less than 0.1 mg/dl.

The patient was induced at 37+1 weeks of gestation using misoprostol and then followed by oxytocin for labor augmentation. The patient progressed smoothly to full dilation within 12 hours of induction. She delivered a live born male of weight 3340 grams and Apagr score of 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 minutes respectively. The patient and her child were discharged home on the day 1 post vaginal delivery in a stable condition. Follow up TBAS 1-week post-partum revealed a value of 5.9 micro-mol/L, with complete resolution of symptoms. The patient provided an informed consent with which we were given permission to access her medical chart.

3. Discussion

The prevalence of ICP during pregnancy varies geographically from 0.1 to 15.6% [11]. The potential poor pregnancy outcomes push obstetricians towards a closer follow up of affected pregnancies. One of the challenges that primary care physicians face is the ability to make a timely diagnosis of such a threatening condition, especially when symptoms appear early on during pregnancy. The cut-off gestational age for differentiation between early and late onset is set at 34 weeks of gestation [5]. It is believed that elevated levels of estrogen as well as progesterone might play an inducing factor in the onset of ICP [12, 13]. Add to that, genetic predisposition might lead to malfunction in the bile acid transmembrane hepatocyte transporters, causing accumulation of bile acid. In fact, in the setting of hyperestrogenism (i.e. pregnancy or oral contraceptive pill intake), this malfunction becomes evident and the patient develops the typical symptomatology [14]. Most of the data documented that early onset first trimester ICP cases are concomitant with supra-physiological estrogen levels during the first trimester. Such elevated sex steroid levels are usually noted in multiple gestations or pregnancies complicated by ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Add to that, pregnancies conceived via ovarian stimulation cycles with subsequent embryo transfer are at a higher risk of developing early onset ICP [15]. However, our patient conceived spontaneously and already had a noncomplicated pregnancy before which only strengthens the fact that the cause-effect relationship leading to ICP is weak and still needs to be fully clarified. Table 1 shows the published cases of first trimester ICP along with the identified risk factors and the pregnancy outcomes.


Article titleNumber of casesPredisposing factorEthnicityGestational age at diagnosis/onset of symptomsBile acid level at the time of diagnosis (micro-mole/L)Pregnancy Outcome

Kirkinen et al. 19951(i) Triploid fetusNot availableNot availableNot availableNot specified
(ii) Elevated alpha Fetoprotein

Brites et al. 19981Not specifiedNot available11 weeks of gestation198 at 20 weeks of gestationIOL at 36 weeks of gestation.
Baby had intestinal stenosis

Zamah et al. 20082(i) IVF treatmentAsian8 weeks of gestation137.2IOL at term due to oligohydramnios
(ii) Moderate OHSSEast Indian6 weeks of gestation308Spontaneous miscarriage at 9 weeks of gestation

Steele et al. 20121(i) First pregnancy No obvious risk factorsBritish11 weeks of gestation205 at 16 weeks of gestationEmergency cesarean for nonreassuring fetal heart at 32+2 weeks of gestation

Johnston et al. 20141(i) Recurrent ICP Not available8 weeks of gestation217PPROM at 30+5 weeks of gestation
(ii) Heterozygous mutation of ABCB4 genec/s for malpresentation

Hubschmann et al. 20161(i) Recurrent ICPGuatemalan7+5 weeks of gestation243.6 at 13+5 weeks of gestationElective cesarean section at 31+6 weeks of gestation

Mutlu et al. 20172(i) IVF treatmentTurkish6 weeks of gestation166.8Blighted ovum
(ii) Moderate OHSSTurkish5 weeks of gestation122PPROM at 36 WG with delivery of twins via cesarean section

Our case1(i) No known risk factorsLebanese10 weeks of gestation9.1 at 18 weeks of gestationIOL at 37 weeks of gestation.

J. Lin et al. showed that adverse pregnancy outcomes were higher in patients diagnosed to have early onset ICP compared to the late-onset ICP group, the analysis revealed significantly higher rates of fetal distress, intrauterine growth restriction, preterm birth, and low birth weight in the early-onset ICP group [5]. The overall preterm delivery rate was 34.15% in comparison to the worldwide numbers that range between 19 and 60% [5, 9, 16]. This is due in part to the induction of labor at earlier gestational ages to avoid fetal adverse events. Add to that, elevated bile acid concentrations alter cell membrane permeability and stimulate prostaglandin release, thus leading to increased uterine reactivity as well as increased sensitivity to oxytocin which might cause preterm labor [17]. On another level, it has been postulated that bile acid salts deposit in the placenta and lead to edema, strictures, and acceleration of placental cell apoptosis with subsequent alteration of the placental function [9]. Also, elevated maternal and amniotic fluid levels of bile acids can lead to umbilical vessels spasms with resultant reduction in the trans-placental nutrient exchange and fetal oxygenation. It has been postulated as well that, elevated fetal levels of acids might cause end organ damage resulting in fetal hypoxia and death [18]. Finally, recent studies have showed that fetal cardiomyocytes harbor receptors for bile acids known as the nuclear BA receptor farnesoid-X receptor (FXR) that have been found to be involved in cardiac injury and cardiomyocyte apoptosis [19]. Elevated levels of bile acids might therefore be potentially cardio-toxic with resultant life threatening arrhythmias, cardiac dysfunction, and intrauterine fetal death (relative risk of 2.58 in comparison with non-ICP pregnancies) [20]. In the setting of early onset ICP, the duration of fetal and placental exposure to abnormally elevated bile acid salt levels is significantly prolonged and thus the cytotoxic effects are more likely to take place. This mandates a closer follow up of patients diagnosed to have ICP at an early stage of pregnancy as well as timed intervention to interrupt pregnancy [9, 18].

Until today, many studies have been performed to assess the effectiveness and safety profile of the widely used Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). It has been suggested that it not only improves the severity of the symptoms related to ICP, but also decreases the level of bile acid salts and potentially improves the pregnancy outcome especially in the setting of early onset ICP [21, 22]. The exact mechanism by which UDCA improves the outcome of ICP patients is unknown so far. It is believed that UDCA normalizes hepatic metabolism, improves transplacental bile acid transport, and/or prevents the oxidative stress and cellular death [23]. Furthermore, UDCA is believed to be cardio-protective and thus an enhancer of the fetal cardiac function. This is vital in the setting of the suspicion that elevated bile acid salts can cause cardiac arrest of the fetus [24]. In Lebanon, clear and independent guidelines are absent, thus the guidelines of the American college of obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) as well as the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) are adapted in our daily practice. However, given that this particular patient did not improve on the recommended doses of UDCA, the decision was taken to treat her with the highest level recommended in the literature which is equivalent to 2000 mg/day [8]. Other newer approaches to ICP medical treatment such as Resveratrol, a Silent Information Regulator 1 (SIRT1) is thought to activate SIRT1 with resultant reduction in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and bile acids [25]. The use of Resveratrol in the context of ICP however is still limited pending more conclusive data.

The ideal time of delivery is determined based on the severity of maternal symptoms, onset of ICP, and maternal discomfort as well as assessment of fetal well-being [5]. Mild ICP patients can be managed till 38 WG, while severe cases of ICP should be delivered at maximum of 37 WG. Recent investigations have showed that ICP patients are more prone to serious conditions such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, as well as nonpregnancy related hepatobiliary disease such portal hypertension and liver failure [2628].

4. Conclusion

First trimester ICP is a rare condition that physicians need to be aware of particularly in the setting of typical symptomatology. So far, close follow-up, fetal monitoring, and UDCA are the mainstay of treatment to avoid poor neonatal outcomes. Further studies are needed to better understand the pathophysiology and find the ultimate treatment for ICP.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut-Lebanon.

References

  1. Šimják, Patrik, A. Pařízek et al., “Fetal complications due to intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy,” Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 133–139, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Floreani and M. T. Gervasi, “New insights on intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy,” Clinics in Liver Disease, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 177–189, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. H. Dixon and C. Williamson, “The pathophysiology of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy,” Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 141–153, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Z. Jie, D. Yiling, and Y. Ling, “Association of assisted reproductive technology with adverse pregnancy outcomes,” Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 169, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  5. J. Lin, W. Gu, and Y. Hou, “Diagnosis and prognosis of early-onset intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a prospective study,” The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol. 7, pp. 1–7, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. F. Mutlu, K. Aslan, I. Guler et al., “Two cases of first onset intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy associated with moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after IVF treatment and review of the literature,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 547–549, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Ribalta, H. Reyes, M. C. Gonzalez et al., “S-Adenosyl-L-methionine in the treatment of patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with negative results,” Hepatology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1084–1089, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Glantz, H. U. Marschall, and L. Å. Mattsson, “Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: relationships between bile acid levels and fetal complication rates,” Hepatology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 467–474, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. T. Chao and J. S. Sheffield, “Primary dermatologic findings with early-onset intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 456–458, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Madazli, M. A. Yuksel, M. Oncul, A. Tuten, O. Guralp, and B. Aydin, “Pregnancy outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 358–361, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Ozkan, Y. Ceylan, O. V. Ozkan, and S. Yildirim, “Review of a challenging clinical issue: intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy,” World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 7134–7141, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. Reyes and J. Sjövall, “Bile acids and progesterone metabolites intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy,” Annals of Medicine, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 94–106, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Abu-Hayyeh, G. Papacleovoulou, A. Lövgren-Sandblom et al., “Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy levels of sulfated progesterone metabolites inhibit farnesoid X receptor resulting in a cholestatic phenotype,” Hepatology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 716–726, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. G. Hubschmann, K. M. Orzechowski, and V. Berghella, “Severe first trimester recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a case report and literature review,” American Journal of Perinatology Reports, vol. 06, no. 01, pp. e38–e41, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. Feng, W. J. Li, R. H. He, X. W. Sun, G. Wang, and L. Q. Wang, “Impacts of different methods of conception on the perinatal outcome of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in twin pregnancies,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 3985, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. Smolarczyk, M. Grymowicz, J. Sienko, and K. Czajkowski, “Successful perinatal outcome in an early onset intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with extremely high serum hepatic function tests,” Gynecological Endocrinology, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 475-476, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. M. Germain, S. Kato, J. A. Carvajal, G. J. Valenzuela, G. L. Valdes, and J. C. Glasinovic, “Bile acids increase response and expression of human myometrial oxytocin receptor,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 577–582, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. N. Favre, N. Bourdel, V. Sapin, A. Abergel, and D. Gallot, “Importance of bile acids for intra-hepatic cholestasis of pregnancy,” Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 293–295, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Pu, A. Yuan, P. Shan et al., “Cardiomyocyte-expressed farnesoid-X-receptor is a novel apoptosis mediator and contributes to myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury,” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, no. 24, pp. 1834–1845, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. O. Kirbas, E. H. Biberoglu, A. Kirbas et al., “Evaluation of ventricular repolarization in pregnant women with intrahepatic cholestasis,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 15, no. 189, pp. 25–29, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Y. Bacq, L. Sentilhes, H. B. Reyes et al., “Efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid in treating intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a meta-analysis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 143, no. 6, pp. 1492–501, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. X. Kong, Y. Kong, F. Zhang, T. Wang, and J. Yan, “Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a meta-analysis (a prisma-compliant study),” Medicine, vol. 95, no. 40, p. e4949, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Kagawa, R. Orii, S. Hirose et al., “Ursodeoxycholic acid stabilizes the bile salt export pump in the apical membrane in MDCK II cells,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 890–899, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Rodríguez, A. Sprohnle, J. Muñoz, C. Cadena, R. Corvalán, and A. Sepúlveda-Martínez, “Treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with ursodeoxycholic acid associated with improvement of fetal first-degree atrioventricular block,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 801-802, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. E. Liao, Z. Li, and Y. Shao, “Resveratrol regulating SIRT1-NF-κB signal pathway in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy,” Hepatology Research, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 1031–1044, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Labbe, C. Delesalle, C. Creveuil, and M. Dreyfus, “Early and later intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP): study of adverse pregnancy outcomes,” Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 388–394, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. Martineau, C. Raker, R. Powrie, and C. Williamson, “Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of gestational diabetes,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 176, pp. 80–85, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. E. Wikström Shemer, H. U. Marschall, J. F. Ludvigsson, and O. Stephansson, “Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and associated adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes: a 12-year population-based cohort study,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 717–723, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Anastasia A. Salame et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views2090
Downloads406
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.