Fetal Deaths in SARS-CoV-2-Infected Pregnant Women: A Portuguese Case Series

Mira, Ana Rita; Pereira, João Pedro; Dahlstedt-Ferreira, Catrine; Enes, Margarida; Coelho, Hélder Oliveira; Godinho, Ana Beatriz

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8423733

Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Discussion Conclusion Ethical Approval Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions References Copyright Related Articles

Case Series | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 8423733 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8423733

Fetal Deaths in SARS-CoV-2-Infected Pregnant Women: A Portuguese Case Series

Ana Rita Mira,¹João Pedro Pereira,¹Catrine Dahlstedt-Ferreira,²Margarida Enes,¹Hélder Oliveira Coelho,²and Ana Beatriz Godinho¹

Academic Editor: Seung-Yup Ku

Received11 Mar 2022

Revised28 Jun 2022

Accepted12 Jul 2022

Published03 Aug 2022

Abstract

Introduction. Stillbirth has been documented as an outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy. Placental hypoperfusion and inflammation secondary to maternal immune response seem to play a role in the cascade of events that contribute to fetal death. The aim of our study is to report a perinatal outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy adding information to the pool of data on COVID-19 pregnancy outcomes. Case Presentation. This is the first stillbirth case series occurring in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 in a Portuguese cohort. Between April 2020 and March 2021, we had 2680 births in our centre, of which 130 (4.95%) involved mothers infected with SARS-CoV-2. Of total births, there were 14 stillbirths (0.52%), accounting for the highest stillbirth rate we have had in the last 5 years. Among these 14 stillbirths, 5 (35.71%) occurred in SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers. We report the clinical features and placental histopathologic findings of 4 stillbirth cases that occurred in our hospital. Discussion. The stillbirth rate among SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnant women (5/130; 3.84%) was significantly increased compared to noninfected patients (9/2550; 0.35%). Most women (3/4) were asymptomatic for COVID-19, a surprising outcome, given the current literature. All cases had histologic exams showing placental signs of vascular malperfusion, although we acknowledge that 3/5 had obstetric conditions related to placental vascular impairment such as preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Conclusion. Stillbirth can be a perinatal consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy, even in asymptomatic patients. We urge more studies to explore the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the risk of stillbirth.

1. Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is primarily a respiratory infection caused by a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1]. Pregnant women are not thought to be more susceptible to the infection than the general population [2]. However, changes to their immune system mean they are more vulnerable to developing severe disease and being admitted for intensive care support [3, 4]. There have been a few maternal risk factors for severe disease and poorer maternal outcomes. These were maternal age above 30 years, BMI above 30 kg/m², mixed ethnicity, and preexisting comorbidities [5–7]. Studies from registries of pregnant women have reported a greater risk of pregnancy and perinatal complications such as preterm birth and neonatal unit admission [5, 8–12]. There is mixed and “context-dependent” evidence on stillbirth as a direct and indirect outcome of the COVID-19 pandemic [13]. While some cohorts did not demonstrate a significant increase in stillbirth rate [7, 8, 14, 15], growing evidence suggests that stillbirth might be a consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy, especially during the period of Delta variant predominance [5, 9, 16–18]. As an indirect mechanism to explain the increased stillbirth rate, lockdown measures and fear of infection accounted for less access to healthcare, resulting in decreased quality of antenatal surveillance [14, 18]. On the side of direct mechanisms, it is known that SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers a host immune response in the form of a hyperinflammatory “cytokine storm” that causes endothelial dysfunction and coagulation abnormalities [19, 20]. Together, these events result in suboptimal perfusion of vital organs, such as the placenta, ultimately compromising fetal well-being [21]. Indeed, a significant proportion of women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy showed placental histopathologic lesions suggesting hypoperfusion and inflammation [22, 23].

This is the first case series of stillbirths occurring in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 in a Portuguese cohort. We report 4 cases of stillbirth, 3 of which occurred in COVID-19 asymptomatic patients, a surprising outcome, given the current literature [22, 25]. Another interesting aspect of our case series is that all cases had placental signs of vascular malperfusion, a finding that has been associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. During the COVID-19 pandemic, all women admitted for labour in our institution performed a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) SARS-CoV-2 screening test. Our case report is aimed at contributing to the pool of data on COVID-19 pregnancy outcomes and improving evidence for better obstetric counselling and maternal and perinatal care.

1.1. Case Presentation

1.2. Overview

Between April 2020 and March 2021, we had 2624 deliveries in our hospital (a tertiary centre), accounting for 2680 births. Of all deliveries, 130 (4.95%) involved mothers infected with SARS-CoV-2 at birth. In this group of positive mothers, 109 (83.84%) were asymptomatic, 15 (11.53%) had mild symptoms of COVID-19, 5 (3.84%) had moderate symptoms, and 3 (2.30%) had severe disease requiring ICU admission. We had 14 stillbirths overall, of which 5 (35.71%) occurred in SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers. Table 1 summarises the main characteristics of stillbirths that occurred in our centre from April 2020 until March 2021. Categorical variables were expressed in absolute and relative frequencies, and continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation. We performed a proportion difference analysis with IBM SPSS version 26 (Chicago, IL, USA) and set statistical significance at . Stillbirth incidence among SARS-CoV-2-positive patients was 3.84% (5/130), whereas stillbirth incidence, in noninfected patients, was 0.35% (9/2550) (; ). Overall stillbirth rate was 0.52% (14/2680) which increased in comparison to the analogous period of the 4 previous years, as seen in Table 2. However, this increase was not statistically significant under a -test comparing the differences between the stillbirth rate of the period between April 2020 and March 2021 and each of the previous analogous periods.

We report four cases of nonvaccinated SARS-CoV-2-positive pregnant women that had a stillbirth in our tertiary centre below.

1.3. Patient 1

The patient is a 27-year-old healthy multipara, BMI 23.4 kg/m² with two previous term pregnancies complicated by late fetal growth restriction. The pregnancy follow-up was performed at a primary care unit with no complications reported during gestation. The third-trimester ultrasound revealed a normally growing fetus (percentile 50) with normal amniotic fluid levels. At 39 weeks of gestation, the patient entered the emergency department with absent fetal movements and irregular uterine contractions. On admission, a scan confirmed the diagnosis of in utero fetal demise. Her blood pressure was 170-110 mmHg, and her blood and urine test results revealed platelets, uric acid 8.7 mg/dL, AST 50 unit/L, ALT 31 unit/L, LDH 478 unit/L, CRP 2.42 mg/dL, and 400 mg/dL proteinuria. She was diagnosed with severe preeclampsia and was admitted for labour induction. A PCR-SARS-CoV-2 test was performed upon admission and resulted positive. She was asymptomatic for COVID-19. Severe thrombocytopenia was managed with Dexamethasone. Labetalol was used to lower her blood pressure levels. Labour was induced with prostaglandin E1. She had a vaginal delivery of a morphologically normal fetus, and no visible changes were seen in the amniotic fluid, the membranes, or in the umbilical cord. The fetus tested negative on a PCR-SARS-CoV-2 test performed at delivery. A fetal autopsy revealed a normal fetus with a low birth weight—2050 grams (percentile 0.1). Placental histologic examination showed several signs of maternal vascular malperfusion, infarctions on 60% of the placental surface and chorangioma.

1.4. Patient 2

25-year-old healthy nullipara, BMI 22.4 kg/m², had her pregnancy follow-up at a private hospital. No complications were reported during gestation until week 34, when a routine scan revealed a light weight for gestational age fetus—percentile 7, with normal amniotic fluid volume and normal doppler examination. At week 35 and 4 days, the patient presented to the emergency department due to absent fetal movements. In utero fetal demise was confirmed with a scan, and she was admitted for labour induction. Her blood test results revealed leukocytes and 1.98 mg/dL CRP. She tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on a PCR screening test performed upon admission, and she was asymptomatic for COVID-19. Labour was induced with prostaglandin E1, and she had a vaginal delivery of a morphologically normal fetus with low birth weight—1960 grams (percentile 2). The fetus tested positive on a PCR-SARS-CoV-2 test. There were no visible changes in the amniotic fluid, the membranes, or in the umbilical cord. Placental histologic examination revealed increased intravillous lymphocytes and fibrin, avascular villi, and syncytial knots, signs that are suggestive of maternal vascular malperfusion.

1.5. Patient 3

The patient is a 31-year-old healthy multipara, BMI 34 kg/m² with two previous pregnancies, the latest complicated by severe preeclampsia with thrombocytopenia at 40 weeks of gestation. She had her pregnancy follow-up at a primary care unit, and her 3^rd-trimester ultrasound revealed a normally growing fetus (percentile 50) with normal amniotic fluid level. At 36 weeks of gestation, her general practitioner referred her to our outpatient clinic due to elevated blood pressure levels in consecutive measurements (≥140-90 mmHg). At week 38 and 1 day, she had her first appointment in our hospital; her blood pressure levels were normal, she did not have proteinuria, and antepartum fetal monitoring was reassuring. Four days later, she presented to the emergency department, at week 38 and 5 days, with absent fetal movements and uterine contractions. A scan performed upon admission confirmed in utero fetal demise. She was admitted for labour induction and was tested for SARS-CoV-2 as part of the preadmission screening protocol. She tested positive and was asymptomatic for COVID-19. Her blood and urine test results revealed platelets, 1.98 mg/dL CRP, and 500 mg/dL leukocyturia. Labour was induced with prostaglandin E1, and she had a vaginal delivery of a morphologically normal fetus with a negative fetal PCR-SARS-CoV-2 result. There were no visible changes in the amniotic fluid, the membranes, or the umbilical cord. Fetal autopsy revealed a fetus weighing 2300 grams (percentile 1) with no malformations. Placental histologic examination revealed mild acute chorioamnionitis and signs of fetal vascular malperfusion.

1.6. Patient 4

33-year-old healthy multipara (one previous normal pregnancy), BMI 25.7 kg/m², with a spontaneous uncomplicated dichorionic twin gestation had her pregnancy follow-up in a private hospital. At 30 weeks and 3 days of gestation, she presented to the emergency department with suspected preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). On admission, she reported fever and cough within one day of evolution. She was normotensive and febrile—38.1°C. Physical examination confirmed PPROM of the first fetus with clear amniotic fluid. Obstetric ultrasound showed the first fetus in breech presentation and the second fetus in transverse presentation, both with cardiac activity. She was admitted for PPROM management, and both fetuses were monitored continually with cardiotocography. She tested positive in a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. Laboratory test results showed Hb 14.2 g/dL, platelets , APTT 57.6 seconds (control 28 seconds), prothrombin time 16.0 seconds (control 11.5 seconds), fibrinogen 56 mg/dl, AST 280 unit/L, ALT 114 unit/L, total bilirubin 1.0 mg/dl, LDH 1460 unit/L, and spot urine protein/creatinine ratio of 2.6. These values were compatible with HELLP syndrome and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). She was promptly transferred to a COVID-19 isolation unit, and both fetuses were demonitorised for a short period. At the COVID-19 unit, due to difficulties in remonitoring the second fetus, a scan was performed, revealing in utero fetal demise. Maternal status deterioration and nonreassuring fetal heart rate of the first fetus justified an emergent caesarean section that was performed six hours after admission. She delivered a live newborn with an Apgar score of 2-4-5, weighing 1270 grams (percentile 4), followed by a stillborn. There were no macroscopic changes detected in both newborn and fetus, nor in both membranes and umbilical cords. The live-born baby presented a blood panel that was similar to his mother’s and ended up dying on his second day of life. Both babies tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The mother was transferred to an intensive care unit for DIC and HELLP syndrome management. She was discharged on day 10 postpartum with a good recovery. Placental histologic examination revealed infarctions, increased intervillous fibrin, avascular villi, intervillous haemorrhagic thrombi, and histiocytic intervilitis. Chorangioma was detected in the placenta of the second fetus.

All women presented in this case series expressed their wish to contribute to the pool of data on maternal and perinatal outcomes of COVID-19 in pregnancy. Their aim was to improve guidance and management of other pregnant women during the current pandemic.

2. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first case series of stillbirths in women infected by SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy in a Portuguese cohort. The main findings of our series are as follows: the increased rate of stillbirth in our centre from April 2020 to March 2021 0.52% (14/2680) compared to the analogous period of the 4 previous years; the increased rate of stillbirth cases among SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnant women 3.84% (5/130); the increased incidence of obstetric conditions related to placental vascular malperfusion among stillbirths that occurred in SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnancies 60.00% (3/5); the increased incidence of low birth weight among stillbirths of mothers with COVID-19 60.00% (3/5); the majority 60.00% (3/5) of infected women who had a stillbirth were asymptomatic for COVID-19; and the high incidence of a positive PCR-SARS-CoV-2 test 60.00% (3/5) among stillbirths of mothers with COVID-19.

In recent pregnant women studies, stillbirth has more commonly been reported as a perinatal outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection [9, 16, 22]. Due to pandemic restrictions and health services overload, several cohorts have seen an increase in stillbirth rates among positive and negative mothers [26, 27]. Our findings are consistent with what has been reported in literature—we have had a higher stillbirth rate in our centre from April 2020 until March 2021 compared to the same period in the four previous years. In the period of April 2016-March 2017, we notice the second-highest stillbirth rate in the last 5 years. This was due to an elevated number of cases of fetal hydrops (3/11) and infection (3/11) during that period. The authors assume these events as outliers since the number of fetal hydrops and infection in our centre in the last 5 years was approximately 0 and 1 cases per year, respectively.

Regarding stillbirth cases that occurred between April 2020 and March 2021, the incidence of this outcome was much greater in the SARS-CoV-2-positive group 3.84% (5/130) compared to the SARS-CoV-2 negative group 0.35% (9/2550) (). This observation has been widely seen in other cohorts [9, 16, 22], and researchers have been pointing at the placenta as a possible explanation for the increased risk of fetal death in infected pregnant patients. The potential mechanism might be primarily explained on the basis of a secondary effect of the virus owing to placental hypoperfusion [24]. SARS-CoV-2 infection is accompanied by an aggressive inflammatory response with the release of a large number of proinflammatory cytokines in an event known as “cytokine storm” [21]. This response causes endothelial damage and triggers coagulation abnormalities [28–30], which compromise the perfusion of multiple organs including the placenta. Several reports have described placental vascular malperfusion findings in patients with COVID-19 [23, 24]. Most commonly described features are signs of maternal vascular malperfusion such as intervillous thrombi, signs of fetal vascular malperfusion, and chorangiosis [23, 24, 31]. Placental histopathologic exams of the cases from our series are concordant with what has been reported in the literature. All stillbirth placentas presented signs of maternal and fetal malperfusion, such as infarctions, intervillous thrombi, and chorangioma, as seen in Figures 1–3.

(a)

(b)

In our series, 3 out of 5 women in the SARS-CoV-2-positive group developed obstetric conditions related to placental hypoperfusion such as preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. The events occurred in a higher, but not statistically different proportion compared to the SARS-CoV-2 negative group (3 (60%) vs. 1 (11.1%); ). Although it is known that these conditions themselves increase the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes such as stillbirth, it is also known that they have been increasingly reported as outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy [10, 32–34]. Until the date of this case series report, the association between preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome and COVID-19 is still under study as there are multiple common clinical features of preeclampsia and systemic SARS-CoV-2 infection that can hamper their differential diagnosis [35]. Out of 5 stillbirths from SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers, 3 had low birth weight compared to those of the same gestational age. This suggests that intrauterine fetal growth restriction might have taken place during gestation. Regardless of these pregnancies being at higher risk of poor maternal outcomes, we hypothesize that SARS-CoV-2 infection might have been a trigger or an adjuvant factor to the cascade of events that culminated in fetal death.

Interestingly, in 3 out of 4 cases we report in this series, patients were asymptomatic for COVID-19. Given the literature suggests that increasing COVID-19 severity is related to worse maternal outcomes [22, 25], our sample did not seem to follow this pattern. This should raise awareness among clinicians and patients as the majority of pregnant women are asymptomatic or develop mild COVID-19 symptoms [3].

Finally, 3 out of the 5 fetuses tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on a PCR test performed at birth. This finding is also surprising given that vertical transmission seems to occur in a minority of cases [36] since the placenta lacks the expression of proteins required for SARS-CoV-2 infection [37].

Our case report adds further information to the scientific community, patients, and clinicians about perinatal consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy. An important observation of our study—that asymptomatic pregnant women had the worst perinatal consequence, a stillbirth—is of uttermost importance to be reported as it may guide clinical decisions, prenatal counselling, and development of public health measures such as vaccination policies and protection of vulnerable groups.

The strengths of our study are complete placental histologic examinations, performed by the same team of pathologists, allowing for better interpretation of the mechanisms behind fetal death. The major limitation of this case series is the small sample size which hinders our ability to draw conclusions beyond this initial observation.

3. Conclusion

Our case series reports stillbirth as an outcome of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection. The viral immune response seems to play a role in the cascade of events that lead to placental hypoperfusion and consequently compromise fetal well-being. Stillbirth can occur in COVID-19 asymptomatic pregnant women. This should raise awareness among clinicians and patients. We urge more studies to explore the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the risk of stillbirth.

Ethical Approval

The report of this case series was conducted in accordance with the principles of Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the hospital’s review board.

Written consent was obtained from all patients.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this case series.

Authors’ Contributions

Ana Rita Mira contributed to manuscript and case writing, statistical analysis, literature review, bibliography search, and case aggregation. João Pedro Pereira contributed to case writing, bibliography search, and manuscript review. Catrine Dahlstedt-Ferreira contributed to image collection, case review, and literature review. Margarida Enes and Hélder Oliveira Coelho contributed to manuscript review. Ana Beatriz Godinho contributed to manuscript review and bibliography search.

References

W. H. O. World Health Organization, “Coronavirus (COVID-19) events as they happen”.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Chen, Z. Li, Y. Y. Zhang, W. H. Zhao, and Z. Y. Yu, “Maternal health care management during the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 731–739, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Knight, K. Bunch, N. Vousden et al., “Characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women admitted to hospital with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK: national population based cohort study,” BMJ, vol. 369, pp. 1-2, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “Pregnant and recently pregnant people,” http://Www.Cdc.Gov. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/pregnant-people.html.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Allotey, E. Stallings, M. Bonet et al., “Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis,” BMJ, vol. 370, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Vousden, R. Ramakrishnan, K. Bunch et al., “Management and implications of severe COVID-19 in pregnancy in the UK: data from the UK obstetric surveillance system national cohort,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 461–470, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Vousden, K. Bunch, E. Morris et al., “The incidence, characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women hospitalized with symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in the UK from March to September 2020: a national cohort study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS),” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 5, article e0251123, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Mullins, M. L. Hudak, J. Banerjee et al., “Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of COVID-19: coreporting of common outcomes from PAN-COVID and AAP-SONPM registries,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 573–581, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Gurol-urganci, J. E. Jardine, F. Carroll et al., “Maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of birth in Englad: national cohort study,” AJOG, vol. 225, no. 5, pp. 522.e1–522.e11, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Villar, S. Ariff, R. B. Gunier et al., “Maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality among pregnant women with and without COVID-19 infection: the INTERCOVID multinational cohort study,” JAMA Pediatrics, vol. 175, no. 8, pp. 817–826, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Di Guardo, F. M. D. Grazia, L. M. D. Gregorio et al., “Poor maternal–neonatal outcomes in pregnant patients with confirmed SARS-Cov-2 infection: analysis of 145 cases,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 303, no. 6, pp. 1483–1488, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Sahin, A. Tanacan, A. T. Anuk et al., “Comparison of clinical features and perinatal outcomes between pre-variant and post-variant periods in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2: analysis of 1935 cases,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, pp. 1–10, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Vaccaro, F. Mahmoud, L. Aboulatta, B. Aloud, and S. Eltonsy, “The impact of COVID-19 first wave national lockdowns on perinatal outcomes: a rapid review and meta-analysis,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hawco, D. L. Rolnik, A. Woolner et al., “The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review with meta-analysis,” European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, vol. 274, pp. 117–127, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Rolnik, A. Matheson, Y. Liu et al., “Impact of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on pregnancy duration and outcome in Melbourne, Australia,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 677–687, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. DeSisto, B. Wallace, R. M. Simeone et al., “Risk for stillbirth among women with and without COVID-19 at delivery hospitalization — United States, March 2020–September 2021,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 70, no. 47, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Cruz Melguizo, M. L. C. Conty, P. C. Payán et al., “Pregnancy outcomes and SARS-CoV-2 infection: the Spanish obstetric emergency group study,” Viruses, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 853, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Vousden, R. Ramakrishnan, K. Bunch et al., “Severity of maternal infection and perinatal outcomes during periods of SARS-CoV-2 wildtype, alpha, and delta variant dominance in the UK: prospective cohort study,” BMJ Medicine, vol. 1, no. 1, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Jardine, S. Relph, L. A. Magee et al., “Maternity services in the UK during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a national survey of modifications to standard care,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 880–889, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gupta, M. V. Madhavan, K. Sehgal et al., “Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19,” Nature Medicine, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1017–1032, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Bohn, A. Hall, L. Sepiashvili, B. Jung, S. Steele, and K. Adeli, “Pathophysiology of COVID-19: mechanisms underlying disease severity and progression,” Physiology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 288–301, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Q. Wei, M. Bilodeau-Bertrand, S. Liu, and N. Auger, “The impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” CMAJ, vol. 193, no. 16, pp. E540–E548, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. D. Shanes, L. B. Mithal, S. Otero, H. A. Azad, E. S. Miller, and J. A. Goldstein, “Placental pathology in COVID-19,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Di Girolamo, A. Khalil, S. Alameddine et al., “Placental histopathology after SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, vol. 3, no. 6, p. 100468, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Di Mascio, D. Buca, V. Berghella et al., “Counseling in maternal–fetal medicine:SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in pregnancy,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 687–697, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mor, N. Kugler, E. Jauniaux et al., “Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on excess perinatal mortality and morbidity in Israel,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 398–403, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Chmielewska, I. Barratt, R. Townsend et al., “Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” The Lancet Global Health, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. e759–e772, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Iba, J. H. Levy, M. Levi, and J. Thachil, “Coagulopathy in COVID-19,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 2103–2109, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Servante, G. Swallow, J. G. Thorton et al., “Haemostatic and thrombo-embolic complications in pregnant women with COVID-19: a systematic review and critical analysis,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 108–114, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Vlachodimitropoulou Koumoutsea, A. J. Vivanti, N. Shehata et al., “COVID‐19 and acute coagulopathy in pregnancy,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1648–1652, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. T. Patberg, T. Adams, P. Rekawek et al., “Coronavirus disease 2019 infection and placental histopathology in women delivering at term,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 224, no. 4, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. T. Papageorghiou, P. Deruelle, R. B. Gunier et al., “Preeclampsia and COVID-19: results from the INTERCOVID prospective longitudinal study,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 225, no. 3, pp. 289.e1–289.e17, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Conde-Agudelo and R. Romero, “SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 226, no. 1, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. I. Rosenbloom, N. Raghuraman, E. B. Carter, and J. C. Kelly, “COVID-19 infection and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 224, no. 6, pp. 623-624, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mendoza, I. Garcia-Ruiz, N. Maiz et al., “Preeclampsia-like syndrome induced by severe COVID-19: a prospective observational study,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 127, no. 11, pp. 1374–1380, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Kotlyar, O. Grechukhina, A. Chen et al., “Vertical transmission of coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 224, no. 1, pp. 35–53.e3, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Beesley, J. R. Davidson, F. Panariello et al., “COVID‐19 and vertical transmission: assessing the expression of ACE2/TMPRSS2 in the human fetus and placenta to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 256–266, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Ana Rita Mira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

423

Downloads

482

Citations