Case Reports in Oncological Medicine

Case Reports in Oncological Medicine / 2013 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 594787 |

M. S. Sanatani, A. Lazo-Langner, I. M. Al-Rasheedy, "Cisplatin and Short-Term 5-Fluorouracil Infusion for Paraneoplastic Microangiopathic Hemolytic Anemia in Gastric Cancer: A Case Report and Review of the Literature", Case Reports in Oncological Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 594787, 8 pages, 2013.

Cisplatin and Short-Term 5-Fluorouracil Infusion for Paraneoplastic Microangiopathic Hemolytic Anemia in Gastric Cancer: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Academic Editor: S. Ohno
Received22 Oct 2013
Accepted20 Nov 2013
Published29 Dec 2013


Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome accompanying adenocarcinoma of the stomach. We report on a patient presenting with anemia due to a combination of severe hemolysis and tumour bleeding, where the combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in a short course infusional regimen led to a complete response of the hematologic abnormalities in the first line setting. Relapse was successfully treated with second line docetaxel; however the response was relatively short-lived. Overall survival was 16 months from diagnosis, which compares favourably to the survival of other reported cases. The chemotherapy regimens used in previously reported similar cases are reviewed. We suggest that a regimen based on bolus 5-fluorouracil, possibly with a platinum, should be investigated as a possible regimen of choice.

1. Introduction

Cancer-associated microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) is a rare, potentially fatal complication of malignant tumors, usually associated with poor prognosis. It has been reported to occur in gastric, breast, prostate, and lung cancer and also a few cases have been reported in patients with carcinoma of unknown origin [1]. This condition was first described by Brain et al. in 1962 [2]. It is defined as a severe hemolytic anemia in the setting of malignancy with negative Coombs’ test and fragmented red blood cells in the peripheral blood smear. The clinical presentation may include features of DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation), TTP (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura), or HUS (hemolytic uremic syndrome) and the distinction between these conditions is usually not straightforward. We report on a case of a patient with severe hemolytic anemia in the setting of metastatic gastric cancer who experienced a complete resolution of the anemia and a marked tumor response after treatment with palliative chemotherapy. Building on a recently published review by Lechner and Obermeier [3], we also review prior reported cases of hemolysis in gastric cancer specifically in regard to the chemotherapy regimen used.

2. Presentation and Diagnosis

A 49-year-old previously healthy male was admitted to the hospital with a history of increased dyspnea and fatigue over the course of several weeks. Other history was negative apart from a history of longstanding heartburn that was controlled with proton pump inhibitors and a history of early satiety for the last 1-2 years. There was no family history of malignancy. He was diagnosed with severe anemia (hemoglobin 52 g/L) and his peripheral smear showed schistocytes and polychromasia, as well as nucleated red blood cells (Figure 1). Serum free haptoglobin level was undetectable. Coombs’ test was negative, bilirubin and LDH were elevated (73.1 μmol/L [normal < 17.1] and 917 U/L [normal < 225], resp.), and a diagnosis of MAHA was made. In order to rule out an underlying solid tumor, CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was performed demonstrating widespread metastatic disease, with thickening of the stomach and a GE junction mass measuring about 6 × 3.2 cm (Figure 2(a)). Gastroscopy was done and confirmed a gastroesophageal junction mass, with the biopsy showing low grade adenocarcinoma.

3. Initial Treatment Course

The patient was given transfusions, but his hemoglobin remained persistently below 80 g/L. He also developed episodes of melena. His laboratory tests showed worsening hemolysis, and after a drop in the platelet count (from 169,000/μL on admission to 76,000/μL after one week) a diagnosis of possible thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) was made and he was started on a trial of daily plasmapheresis without improvement.

Because of the melena, the patient was referred to radiation oncology and was treated with palliative radiotherapy (2000 cGy in 5 fractions) to the primary tumour in the stomach with resolution of the melena, but with no improvement in the transfusion requirements. A decision was made to start palliative chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). A short intense regimen consisting of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 day 1 and 5-FU infusion 1000 mg/m2/day, days 1 through 4, all q21 days, was chosen to minimize days without plasmapheresis. However, during the first cycle plasmapheresis was discontinued due to lack of response, and shortly after the patient’s hemoglobin started to stabilize with decreasing transfusion requirements and by three weeks after therapy start, he was no longer transfusion dependent. He was discharged from hospital approximately one month after admission, ambulatory and with improving performance status.

The patient continued on chemotherapy with cisplatin/5-FU every three weeks as outlined above. After three cycles of chemotherapy, he was completely asymptomatic (ECOG 0), no longer requiring any transfusions. A CT scan (Figure 2(b)) showed a decrease in the number and size of liver metastases. He completed 10 cycles, after which the treatment was stopped because of worsening sensory neuropathy.

Two months after this last chemotherapy the patient presented on followup with progressive disease in form of recurrent hemolysis and worsening liver metastases, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, and a recurrent mass in the GE junction as well as melena. He received a single fraction of palliative radiation to the stomach and was started on second line chemotherapy with DCF (docetaxel 25 mg/m2 weekly, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 q21 days, and 200 mg/m2 5-FU infusion). The hemoglobin and other indicators of hemolysis stabilized again (Figure 3), and CT scan followup after 3 cycles showed mixed response in the hepatic metastases. He continued the DCF chemotherapy for control of the hemolysis for a total of 6 cycles, with cisplatin and 5-FU then omitted due to declining performance status and mucositis (change to single agent docetaxel), but presented later with an intractable GI bleed from the primary tumour. Despite endoscopic intervention by the gastroenterology service he continued to deteriorate and comfort measures were instituted. He died of gastric hemorrhage, 16 months from the time of his initial presentation with stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma.

4. Discussion

Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) can be the first manifestation of malignancy such as gastroesophageal cancer. Indeed, several case reports [46] exist describing curative-intent surgery after diagnosis of an early stage gastric cancer presenting with MAHA. We report on the case of a previously undiagnosed gastroesophageal cancer patient with severe hemolytic anemia requiring up to 5 units daily of blood, in whom chemotherapy resulted in a complete response of the hemolysis and an ongoing response in the tumor burden for over a year. We chose a cisplatin and short-term infusion 5-FU regimen rather than the usual DCF or ECF (epirubicin/cisplatin/5-FU) treatments based on prior case reports [7, 8] and also initially to allow plasmapheresis, which however ultimately was abandoned quickly. We also had concerns initially regarding myelosuppression by a 3-agent regimen. Since the tumour was Her2neu negative no trastuzumab therapy was considered.

Published cases of MAHA associated with gastric cancer [3] are detailed in Table 1 [436].

ReferenceAgeM/FHb (g/L)Platelets (×109/L)Plasma-pheresisHematological diagnosisChemotherapy 1st lineSubsequent chemotherapyApproximate survival from the beginning of the first therapy for hemolysis (if applicable) or presentation

[9]70M7280YesTTPCarboplatin/paclitaxel14 days
[10]52F7262NoMAHANone1 week
[10]28M7577NoMAHANone1 week
[10]21M61342NoMAHANone1 week
[8]62M10786NoMAHAEtoposide 120 mg/m2, leucovorin 300 mg/m2, and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 days 1–3, every 21 days5-FU 2000 mg/m2, leucovorin 500 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 1 every 14 days12 months
[11]19M10098NoMAHA with DIC 5-FU, adriamycin, and mitomycin-C6 days
[12]61F 95 estNRNoCancer-related thrombotic microangiopathyInfusional 5-FU 250 mg/m2/day35 days
[13]60M8243YesTTP5-FU, adriamycin, and mitomycin C 6 months
[14]59F6120YesTTPNone1 month
[14]65F8086NoTTPPaclitaxel11 months
[15]52M6024YesMAHA without DICNone4 weeks
[16]75M81NRNoMAHANone20 days
[17]58F5814NoMAHA5-FU, vincristine, methotrexate, and cyclophosphamide10 days
[18]50M7350YesCancer-associated MAHADocetaxel, 5-FU, and platinum12 days
[4]71M4418NoTTPNoneCurative-intent surgery
[19]25F74100NoMAHA5-FU 600 mg/m2 weekly + adriamycin 40 mg/m2 day 1, q21 daysMitomycin-C 10 mg/m2 monthly7 months
[20]28F52111YesTTPCisplatin/5-FU infusionUnder 2 months
[7]45M5950NoMAHA and thrombocytopeniaCisplatin 60 mg/m2 day 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m2/day infusion days 1–4, every 21 days7 weeks
[7]32FNRNRYesMAHA and thrombocytopeniaCisplatin 20 mg/m2 days 1–5, etoposide 60 mg/m2 days 1–5, every 21 days5-FU 298 (=70% of 425) mg/m2 and leucovorin 20 mg/m2 days 1–5, and weekly cetuximab 500 mg IV, all every 21 days12 weeks approx..
[5]71F5615.6NoMAHAMitomycin-C 10 mg and neothramycin (also gabexate infusion), 5 doses over 2 months3 months
[6]69M6564YesThrombotic microangiopathy with renal failureN/ACurative intent surgery
[21]60M9835NoDICNone24 days
[22]83F4085NoMHANone3 days
[23]47F499NoMAHACisplatin 80 mg/m2 day 1, 5-FU 1000 mg/m2/day, days 1–5FOLFIRI, DCF at 20% dose reduction19 months
[24]69F96104NoMAHAAdriamycin4 weeks
[25]44M7471NoMAHA and DICNone3 months
[26]57M5839NoDICMethotrexate 100 mg/m2 day 1, 5-FU bolus 600 mg/m2 day 1, LV 10 mg/m2 q6h days 2 and 3, weekly10 months
[27]52F6818NoThrombotic microangiopathy 5-FU, cisplatin, and hydroxyurea3 months
[27]51M7474NoThrombotic microangiopathy Gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-FU, and docetaxel (details not reported)4 months
[27]59M6639YesThrombotic microangiopathy None44 days
[28]51F6740YesTTPVincristine 2 mgCisplatin 50 mg/m2days 1 + 15, 5-FU 150 mg/m2, and LV 500 mg weekly3 months
[29]59F8623NoDICNone10 days
[29]51F39120NoDICNone22 days
[29]46F11559NoDICNone8 days
[30]43M53NRNoHUSNoneSurgery, no recurrence
[31]66M70250NoMAHA5-FU 425 mg/m2 and leucovorin 20 mg/m2 daily 5-FU 425 mg/m2 and leucovorin 20 mg/m2 daily 26 months
[32]NRNR4345NoMAHACisplatin/5-FU 2 days
[33]50M8595NoPulmonary tumour Thrombotic microangiopathy5-FU 250 mg daily, mitomycin C 7 mg weekly, and cisplatin 125 mg once86 days
[34]66M7328NoHemol. anemiaNone15 days
[34]43M9150Hemol. anemiaNone7 days
[35]43M7862NoDIC/MAHAMMC, 5-FU, Ara-C, and heparin6 months
[36]27F7223YesThrombotic microangiopathyNone3 days
Our case49M5276YesCR-MAHACisplatin 50 mg/m2 day 1, 5-FU infusion 1000 mg/m2/day, days 1 through 4, all every 21 days Docetaxel 25 mg/m2 weekly, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 every 21 days, and 200 mg/m2 5-FU infusion daily16 months

CR: cancer-related; DIC: disseminated intravascular coagulation; 5-FU: 5-fluorouracil; HUS: hemolytic uremic syndrome; MAHA: microangiopathic hemolytic anemia; MMC: mitomycin-C; TTP: thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Two observations from this summary are worth pointing out.

(1) Diagnosis and Purported Mechanism. There are many reported cases of hemolytic anemia with or without thrombocytopenia in gastric cancer. However, a unifying diagnosis or nomenclature remains elusive. In several cases (including ours) clinical consideration was given to the diagnosis of TTP/HUS. As in many other published cases of CR-MAHA, plasmapheresis was performed; however it did not seem to have a significant effect. Carr et al. [13] have reported on a patient with gastric cancer and TTP where plasmapheresis did improve gastrointestinal bleeding, fever, and mental status changes; however that patient’s presentation may have had a different pathophysiological basis than our case. All these observations raise the question of whether malignancy-associated MAHA that is unresponsive to plasmapheresis is a form of TTP/HUS or rather is a completely different disease entity and although some reduction in ADAMTS13 metalloproteinase activity has been reported in cancer patients with hemolysis, this can also be the case in other clinical settings [37]. Levels of von-Willebrand factor cleaving protease are not consistently altered in CR-MAHA associated with thrombocytopenia [12]. Future research into the pathophysiology underlying CR-MAHA, as well as clarification of nomenclature, classification, and distinction between TTP, HUS, DIC, and possibly “CR-MAHA with thrombocytopenia NOS (not otherwise specified),” is urgently required.

(2) Heterogeneity of Management Approaches. A review of the published cases highlights the heterogeneity of the treatment approaches used for patients presenting with hemolysis and gastric cancer and reflects the evolution of systemic therapy for this malignancy over the last three decades. Cytotoxics used, in various combinations, were carboplatin, cisplatin, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, mitomycin-C, vincristine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, gemcitabine, irinotecan, and hydroxyurea. Interestingly, only very few publications [7, 8, 26] provided all the details of the chemotherapy regimen required to prescribe it. Many patients apparently did not receive chemotherapy because of poor performance status. Based on our experience we would suggest that gastric cancer patients with CR-MAHA may benefit from a trial of chemotherapy, within reason, even though they may appear too ill for this. Our patient had an ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of 4 when chemotherapy was started but improved to ECOG 0 within a few months. Approximately one quarter of the patients in this review received plasmapheresis, with only one patient deriving clinical benefit [13].

(3) Is There an “Anecdotally Best” Treatment Approach? Based on our case as well as the review of other cases, we would suggest several management principles for future cases. In regard to diagnosis, to avoid confusion, an overall inclusive diagnostic term for a condition presenting with evidence of hemolysis, negative Coombs’ test, thrombocytopenia, gastric malignancy known or suspected, and absence of renal failure or mental status changes may be “gastric-cancer-associated MAHA with thrombocytopenia.” On establishing that diagnosis, it would appear that rapid initiation of chemotherapy is of greater importance than that of plasmapheresis. This may not apply in cases where the presentation has most of the features of classical TTP or HUS including hemorrhage or renal or nervous system dysfunction.

Second, it would appear that chemotherapy regimens including cisplatin as well as bolus 5-fluorouracil (our patient, [7, 8, 23, 31]) may be the treatment of choice as anecdotally patients treated with such regimens had superior survival in the cases reviewed here. Third, chemotherapy should perhaps be continued in situations where it usually would not be, (e.g., despite developing adverse events and tumour growth). In retrospect, even though our patient eventually did have a relatively long survival, it is conceivable that continuing chemotherapy despite the worsening neuropathy could have had a beneficial effect on preventing the recurrence of the hemolysis. We also demonstrated control of hemolysis in the setting of progressive tumour growth on second line chemotherapy, although the duration of control was much shorter in this setting (6 versus 10 cycles on first line therapy with ongoing tumour control).

Further research into the etiology and mechanism of malignancy-associated MAHA and its connection to TTP/HUS, as well as development of consistent terminology and diagnostic criteria, may shed some further light on management of similar cases in the future.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. K. H. Antman, A. T. Skarin, R. J. Mayer, H. K. Hargreaves, and G. P. Canellos, “Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and cancer: a review,” Medicine, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 377–384, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  2. M. C. Brain, J. V. Dacie, and D. O. Hourihane, “Microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia: the possible role of vascular lesions in pathogenesis,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 8, pp. 358–374, 1962. View at: Google Scholar
  3. K. Lechner and H. L. Obermeier, “Cancer-related microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Clinical and laboratory features in 168 reported cases,” Medicine, vol. 91, pp. 195–205, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  4. P. Girard, B. Tardy, Y. Page, J. F. Mosnier, B. Tardy-Poncet, and J. C. Bertrand, “Cancer presenting as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Two case reports,” Presse Medicale, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 175–178, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  5. T. Kanou, Y. Nosou, K. Yoshinaka et al., “Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia associated with gastric cancer,” Gan No Rinsho, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1029–1034, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  6. G. Lakshminarayana, R. Rajesh, N. V. Seethalekshmy, G. Kurian, and V. N. Unni, “Thrombotic microangiopathy with severe renal failure in adenocarcinoma,” Indian Journal of Nephrology, vol. 18, pp. 74–76, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  7. O. Kaidar-Person, H. Nasrallah, N. Haim, E. J. Dann, and G. Bar-Sela, “Disseminated carcinoma diagnosed by bone marrow biopsy in patients with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia: a report of two cases with gastric cancer and a review of the literature,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 123–126, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H.-T. Arkenau, O. Müssig, T. Buhr, H. H. Jend, and R. Porschen, “Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) as paraneoplastic syndrome in metastasized signet ring cell carcinomas: case reports and review of the literature,” Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 719–722, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Alexopoulou, S. P. Dourakis, and E. Nomikou, “Case of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with disseminated gastric cancer,” American Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 25, no. 6, p. 632, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  10. N. Ali, N. Kamran, S. Adil, and S. Pervez, “Metastatic signet ring gastric adenocarcinoma presenting with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia,” Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 185–186, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  11. A. Bisetti, M. Lalicata, and E. Jacot-des-Combes, “Occult gastric adenocarcinoma with pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia in a young adult,” Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift, vol. 115, no. 16, pp. 561–564, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  12. E. Blot, D. Decaudin, A. Veyradier, A. Bardier, O.-L. Zagame, and P. Pouillart, “Cancer-related thrombotic microangiopathy secondary to Von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease deficiency,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 127–130, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. J. Carr, B. S. Kramer, and D. E. Dragonetti, “Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: successful management with plasmapheresis,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 476–479, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  14. J. C. Chang and T. Naqvi, “Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with bone marrow metastasis and secondary myelofibrosis in cancer,” Oncologist, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 375–380, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. Chevalet, A. Moreau, F. Muller, J. M. Berthelot, M. Hamidou, and A. Prost, “Extensive bone marrow necrosis and thrombotic microangiopathy revealing disseminated adenocarcinoma,” Presse Medicale, vol. 27, no. 24, pp. 1213–1215, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  16. E. Crespo-Valadés, M. P. Espinosa-Magro, and C. Marco-Schulke, “Metastatic adenocarcinoma with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia,” Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 511–512, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  17. C. Della Pietra, F. Gudat, P. Obrecht, and D. Hartmann, “Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia in disseminated carcinoma,” Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift, vol. 108, no. 10, pp. 357–362, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  18. M. A. Elliott, L. Letendre, D. A. Gastineau, J. L. Winters, R. K. Pruthi, and J. A. Heit, “Cancer-associated microangiopathic hemolytic anemia with thrombocytopenia: an important diagnostic consideration,” European Journal of Haematology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. M. Hansen and G. A. Hanson, “Gastric carcinoma in young people. A case report and review of the literature,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 497–503, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  20. G. Kadikoylu, S. Barutca, C. Tataroglu et al., “Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura as the first manifestation of metastatic adenocarcinoma in a young woman,” Transfusion and Apheresis Science, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 39–42, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. F. J. Laso, M. González-Díaz, J. I. Paz, and S. de Castro, “Bone marrow necrosis associated with tumor emboli and disseminated intravascular coagulation,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 143, no. 11, p. 2220, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. M. Ludmerer and J. M. Kissane, “Microangiopathic anemia and disseminated intravascular coagulation in an elderly woman,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1052–1060, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  23. A. J. M. Martin, P. G. Alfonso, M. C. R. Martinez et al., “Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and diffuse bone metastasis by signet ring cell adenocarcinoma,” Journal of Cancer Therapy, vol. 1, pp. 94–96, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  24. H. Mauron and R. Streuli, “Anemia, subcutaneous bleeding and weight loss. Disseminated metastasizing, mucinous adenocarcinoma of the stomach,” Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis, vol. 89, no. 39, pp. 1568–1572, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  25. I. Mizuno, O. Izeki, S. Nakahara et al., “Disseminated carcinomatosis of the bone marrow occurring 11 years after subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer,” Rinshō Ketsueki, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 670–675, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  26. N. Noda, T. Sano, K. Shirao et al., “A case of bone marrow recurrence from gastric carcinoma after a nine-year disease-free interval,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 472–475, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  27. L. Oberic, M. Buffet, M. Schwarzinger et al., “Cancer awareness in atypical thrombotic microangiopathies,” Oncologist, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 769–779, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Z. K. Otrock, A. T. Taher, J. A. Makarem, M. M. Kattar, G. Nsouli, and A. I. Shamseddine, “Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and bone marrow necrosis associated with disseminated gastric cancer,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1589–1591, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. E. Pasquini, L. Gianni, E. Aitini et al., “Acute disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome in cancer patients,” Oncology, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 505–508, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  30. O. Ortega Marcos, F. Escuin, J. L. Miguel et al., “Hemolytic uremic syndrome in a patient with gastric adenocarcinoma: partial recovery of renal function after gastrectomy,” Clinical Nephrology, vol. 24, pp. 265–268, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  31. M. Ozgüroglu, F. Demirelli, and N. M. Mandel, “Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia as an early predictor of recurrence in gastric cancer,” American Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 214, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. J. Rauh, A. Al Habeeb, and H. Chang, “Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and leukoerythroblastic blood film heralding bone marrow metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma,” Pathology Research and Practice, vol. 207, no. 2, pp. 121–123, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Sato, K. Marutsuka, Y. Asada, M. Yamada, T. Setoguchi, and A. Sumiyoshi, “Pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy,” Pathology International, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 436–440, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  34. R. Susano, L. Caminal, J. Ferro, A. Rubiales, J. de Lera, and J. F. de Quirós, “Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia associated with neoplasms: an analysis of 5 cases and a review of the literature,” Revista Clinica Espanola, vol. 194, no. 8, pp. 603–606, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  35. R. Takeuchi, M. Kuto, N. Katayama et al., “Carcinomatosis associated with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and disseminated intravascular coagulation: 12 years after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma,” Rinsho Ketsueki, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1423–1429, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  36. R. Vasko, M. Koziolek, L. Füzesi, F. König, F. Strutz, and G. A. Müller, “Fulminant plasmapheresis-refractory thrombotic microangiopathy associated with advanced gastric cancer,” Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 222–225, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. I. Spoormans, S. Altintas, J. van den Brande, A. Luijks, and J. B. Vermorken, “Purpura in a patient with disseminated breast cancer: a rapidly progressive cancer-related thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1204–1207, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 M. S. Sanatani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.