Pancreatic GIST in a Patient with Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report and Review of Published Cases
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and usually occur in the stomach and the small intestine. The pancreas is an extremely rare primary site for GISTs and there are 25 reported cases of pancreatic GIST with most being treated with surgical resection. We describe a 52-year-old African-American female who was diagnosed with limited stage small cell carcinoma in November 2009 and treated with concurrent cisplatin/etoposide chemotherapy and radiation. She subsequently achieved complete remission. Two years later she was diagnosed with localized pancreatic GIST by endoscopic ultrasonography guided fine needle aspiration. We treated her with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib 400 mg oral dose daily as she declined surgery. Her disease is stable based on computed tomography imaging scans 40 months after diagnosis without any metastasis. To the best of our knowledge, our case is the second case of localized pancreatic GIST treated with TKI monotherapy.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and usually occur in the stomach and the small intestine. The pancreas is an extremely rare primary site for GISTs. The annual incidence of GIST in the United States is 5000–6000/year and they are more common in the males, blacks, and the elderly [1, 2]. Workup of these lesions includes morphologic study and immunohistochemical and molecular diagnostic analysis. Historically, these neoplasms had been included under a number of diagnostic categories including leiomyoma, leiomyosarcoma, schwannoma, and leiomyoblastoma. Surgery was the only available treatment and this changed in 2001 after discovery of mutational activation of the KIT or PDGFRA genes  and the use of targeted therapies.
Abstracts, case reports, and case series of pancreatic GIST in the English literature were identified with no date limits until November 2015, by searching the keywords “pancreatic gastrointestinal tumors”, “pancreatic GIST”, and “extra gastrointestinal stromal tumors” in the National Library of Medicine, PubMed, OVID, and EMBASE search engines. Bibliographies of publications were also reviewed for additional relevant studies.
3. Case Presentation
A 52-year-old African-American female was diagnosed with limited stage small cell carcinoma in November 2009 and treated with concurrent cisplatin/etoposide chemotherapy and radiation. She achieved complete remission and underwent prophylactic whole brain radiation in March 2010. Two years later she started to complain of vague abdominal pain and this was investigated with computed tomography (CT) scans which revealed a 3.5 cm enhancing lesion in the pancreas in addition to multiple uterine fibroids (Figure 1).
She underwent endoscopic ultrasonography guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of the pancreatic lesion (Figure 2). Cytopathology revealed atypical cells with spindle cell features. Another EUS-FNA along with core biopsy sampling was performed, yielding the pathological diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Immunohistochemical staining of stromal cells was positive for CD117 (c-kit) and DOG-1 and negative for smooth muscle actin, S-100 protein, and ALK-1 (Figure 3 and Table 1).
We proceeded with medical therapy as patient declined surgical approach, and she was started on treatment with imatinib 400 mg PO daily. During treatment, she experienced imatinib side effects including nausea, vomiting, and leg cramps; we controlled these with promethazine and carisoprodol. Her disease is stable based on CT scans 40 months after diagnosis without any evidence of metastatic disease.
GISTs are group of tumors showing differentiation or derived from the interstitial cells of Cajal which works as the GI pacemaker cells and like GISTs, these cells express both KIT and CD34 [4, 5]. Eighty percent of GIST cases have a mutation in the KIT gene exon 8, 9, 11, 13, or 17 . In around 7% of cases there are mutations in PDGFR exon 12, 14, 18 D842V, or 18 .
Rarely, wild-type adult GIST tumors are associated with activation of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) complex like cases of GIST associated with Carney triad or Neurofibromatosis 1 . On the other hand, wild type is very common in pediatric GIST  in around 85% cases while only 10–15% of adult cases do not harbor any mutation in the KIT and PDGFR genes .
GISTs commonly involve the stomach (60%), jejunum and ileum (30%), duodenum (4-5%), rectum (4%), colon and appendix (1-2%), and esophagus (<1%) and rarely present as primary tumors outside the gastrointestinal lumen such as the omentum, mesentery, and urinary bladder [11–13] or as in our case the pancreas. Both extragastrointestinal GIST and GIST are thought to originate from the gut smooth muscle cells and interstitial cells of Cajal; the former is thought to contribute to the growth outside of the gastrointestinal tract . Another theory is that extragastrointestinal GISTs are mural GISTs which result in extramural growth .
The incidence of GIST is around eleven per million population in an Icelandic study . It is difficult to determine the incidence due to the rarity of extragastrointestinal GIST. The mean age at diagnosis was 63  for GIST compared to 53 for pancreatic GIST from the reviewed case reports. Gender involvement was not different between the pancreatic and extragastrointestinal GIST. A formal statistical analysis was not performed with the available case report data.
GISTs display two morphologic variants represented by the spindle cell and epithelioid subtypes. The spindle cell type is the most frequent, while the histological patterns relate to site of primary origin . The majority of GISTs are strongly positive when stained with antibodies directed against the KIT protein (CD117), and the combination of CD34 and CD117 positivity aids in confirmation of the diagnosis of GIST. There are two targets that have been found to be useful in the diagnosis of GISTs: both C (PKC)-O and DOG1 are expressed in KIT positive and KIT negative GIST [17, 18].
Mutational analysis can aid in determining prognosis or if GIST will be responsive to imatinib therapy, it can also predict which dose level is most appropriate [19, 20]. For example, exon 9 mutant tumors carry the worst prognosis but have superior objective response to tumors with mutations in exon 11, and those patients with documented exon 9 mutations benefit from an 800 mg dose of imatinib rather than the standard 400 mg PO daily dose . Routine mutation analysis is not recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) GIST Task Force due to insufficient data for risk stratification and relapse prognostication . Because of this report, we did not perform the mutation analysis on our patient. This is in contrast to the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines which support administering an imatinib dose of 800 mg daily for exon 9 mutation . The imatinib 400 mg regimen was chosen due to the Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Meta-Analysis Group data .
While imatinib can be used in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting, sunitinib—which is another tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)—is frequently used as second-line therapy in refractory disease or in case of imatinib intolerance . Sunitinib is administered at 50 mg starting dose in 6-week cycles with 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off treatment and can be also given as 37.5 mg PO daily which appears safe and effective . Regorafenib is a TKI that targets multiple kinases including PDGFR, KIT, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors; it can be used in advanced GIST after failure of both imatinib and sunitinib . In the third-line setting, other TKIs such as sorafenib and nilotinib have significant clinical activity in imatinib and sunitinib resistant GIST and may represent an alternative for rechallenge treatment with imatinib, which is of limited benefit; nevertheless, it is superior to best supportive care in terms of overall survival . Ganjoo et al. reported the use of pazopanib, another TKI, in a phase 2 clinical trial as a single agent with marginal activity in unselected heavily pretreated patients with advanced GIST .
To the best of our knowledge, our case is unique in terms of long survival with single nonsurgical modality and it is the second case of localized pancreatic GIST treated only with TKI. In the English literature there are 25 reported cases of pancreatic GIST (Table 2). Padhi et al. reported nineteen cases of pancreatic GIST gathered from 2000 to 2012 . In 2015, Joseph et al. reported a case of a patient with pancreatic GIST that was started on imatinib but later developed metastatic disease and died 9 months later . If the tumor can be resected, then treatment of choice would be surgery. The stabilization of the lesion in our patient with TKI therapy suggests that this is a reasonable therapeutic course in patients who are not surgical candidates. The lesion should be reevaluated for resection within three to four months . Given the limited long term follow-up of patients with the pancreas as the site of origin, it is unclear whether pancreatic GISTs have a different natural history relative to luminal GISTs.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report.
All authors have no competing interests.
K. A. Janeway, S. Y. Kim, M. Lodish et al., “Defects in succinate dehydrogenase in gastrointestinal stromal tumors lacking KIT and PDGFRA mutations,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 314–318, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Prakash, L. Sarran, N. Socci et al., “Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in children and young adults: a clinicopathologic, molecular, and genomic study of 15 cases and review of the literature,” Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 179–187, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lasota, J. A. Carlson, and M. Miettinen, “Spindle cell tumor of urinary bladder serosa with phenotypic and genotypic features of gastrointestinal stromal tumor,” Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 124, no. 6, pp. 894–897, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
M. Miettinen, J. M. Monihan, M. Sarlomo-Rikala et al., “Gastrointestinal stromal tumors/smooth muscle tumors (GISTs) primary in the omentum and mesentery: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 26 cases,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1109–1118, 1999.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Tryggvason, H. G. Gíslason, M. K. Magnússon, and J. G. Jónasson, “Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Iceland, 1990–2003: the Icelandic GIST study, a population-based incidence and pathologic risk stratification study,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 289–293, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Motegi, S. Sakurai, H. Nakayama, T. Sano, T. Oyama, and T. Nakajima, “PKC theta, a novel immunohistochemical marker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), especially useful for identifying KIT-negative tumors,” Pathology International, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 106–112, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Kontogianni-Katsarou, E. Dimitriadis, C. Lariou, E. Kairi-Vassilatou, N. Pandis, and A. Kondi-Paphiti, “KIT exon 11 codon 557/558 deletion/insertion mutations define a subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with malignant potential,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1891–1897, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D. Demetri, M. von Mehren, C. R. Antonescu et al., “NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors,” Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, vol. 8, supplement 2, pp. S1–S44, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
European Sarcoma Network Working Group, “Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 25, supplement 3, pp. iii21–iii26, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
G. D. Demetri, A. T. van Oosterom, C. R. Garrett et al., “Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 368, no. 9544, pp. 1329–1338, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. George, J. Y. Blay, P. G. Casali et al., “Clinical evaluation of continuous daily dosing of sunitinib malate in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after imatinib failure,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1959–1968, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. George, Q. Wang, M. C. Heinrich et al., “Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients with metastatic and/or unresectable GI stromal tumor after failure of imatinib and sunitinib: a multicenter phase II trial,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 30, no. 19, pp. 2401–2407, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Italiano, A. Cioffi, P. Coco et al., “Patterns of care, prognosis, and survival in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) refractory to first-line imatinib and second-line sunitinib,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1551–1559, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. N. Ganjoo, V. M. Villalobos, A. Kamaya et al., “A multicenter phase II study of pazopanib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) following failure of at least imatinib and sunitinib,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 236–240, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. M. Neto, T. N. Machuca, R. V. Pinho, L. D. Yuasa, and L. F. Bleggi-Torres, “Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: report of two unusual cases,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 444, no. 6, pp. 594–596, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
Z. Krska, M. Peskova, C. Povysil et al., “GIST of pancreas,” Prague Medical Report, vol. 106, pp. 201–208, 2005.View at: Google Scholar
B. M. Yan, R. K. Pai, and J. Van Dam, “Diagnosis of pancreatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor by EUS guided FNA,” Journal of the Pancreas, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 192–196, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
T. Harindhanavudhi, T. Tanawuttiwat, J. Pyle, and R. Silva, “Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting as hemorrhagic pancreatic cyst diagnosed by EUS-FNA,” Journal of the Pancreas, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 189–191, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
A. Trabelsi, L. B. Yacoub-Abid, A. Mtimet et al., “Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the pancreas: a case report and review of the literature,” North American Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 324–326, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
S. Padhi, R. Kongara, S. G. Uppin et al., “Extragastrointestinal stromal tumor arising in the pancreas: a case report with a review of the literature,” Journal of the Pancreas, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 244–248, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
M. W. Saif, S. Hotchkiss, and K. Kaley, “Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the pancreas,” Journal of the Pancreas, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 405–412, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
A. Crisan, E. Nicoara, V. Cucui, G. Cornea, and R. Laza, “Prolonged fever associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumor—case report,” Journal of Experimental Medical & Surgical Research, vol. 17, pp. 219–224, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
J. Joshi and T. Rustagi, “Pancreatic extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor: an unusual presentation of a rare diagnosis,” Gastrointestinal Cancer Research, supplement 1, pp. S29–S30, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
A. Barros, E. Linhares, M. Valadão et al., “Extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGIST): a series of case reports,” Hepato-Gastroenterology, vol. 58, no. 107-108, pp. 865–868, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
F. Čečka, B. Jon, A. Ferko, Z. Šubrt, D. H. Nikolov, and V. Tyčová, “Long-term survival of a patient after resection of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor arising from the pancreas,” Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases International, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 330–332, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. N. Rao, M. Vij, N. Singla, and A. Kumar, “Malignant pancreatic extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor diagnosed by ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology. A case report with a review of the literature,” Journal of the Pancreas, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 283–286, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
S. R. Babu, S. Kumari, Y. Zhang, A. Su, W. Wang, and B. Tian, “Extra gastrointestinal stromal tumor arising in the pancreas: a case report and literature review,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research, vol. 1, pp. 80–83, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
M. Aziret, S. Çetinkünar, E. Aktaş, O. İrkörücü, İ. Bali, and H. Erdem, “Pancreatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor after upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and performance of whipple procedure: a case report and literature review,” American Journal of Case Reports, vol. 16, pp. 509–513, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar