|
| Study design | Number of patients | Primary endpoint | R0 resection | Main findings |
|
Bischof et al. [1] | Multi-institutional retrospective cohort | 158 (87 locally advanced, 71 recurrent/metastatic) | RFS, OS | 69% (recurrent/metastatic) versus 87.4% (locally advanced) | TKI-sensitive recurrent/metastatic disease—improved RFS, OS after surgery |
|
Du et al. [43] | Phase III multicenter trial for recurrent/metastatic on IM +/− surgery for residual disease | 41 (19 IM + surgery, 22 IM alone) | PFS | 73.6% | Trend towards improved PFS in surgery group |
|
Tan et al. [13] | Retrospective cohort—upfront surgery versus TKI for recurrence | 186 (56 recurrent—30 resectable, 24 underwent surgery for recurrence) | DFS, OS | 75% (18 of 24) in upfront surgery group | Improved OS and DFS with surgery |
|
Chang et al. [17] | Prospectively collected retrospective review—imatinib + surgery (early versus late groups) versus IM only | 182 (89 metastatic, 93 recurrent, 76 underwent surgery) | Clinical response, PFS, OS | 31.5% (early surgery) versus 59.1% (late surgery) | Improved CR, PR, PFS, OS in early surgery group; improved CR, PR, OS in late surgery group |
|
Sato et al. [25] | Retrospective cohort comparing IM + surgery to surgery only | 737 (93 recurrent/metastatic—50 surgery + TKI therapy, 43 TKI therapy alone) | DFI, OS | 58% (29 of 50) | Improved survival from surgery + TKI after complete resection, response to TKI, < 4 metastatic lesions, lesions < 100 mm total |
|