Case Reports in Ophthalmological Medicine

Case Reports in Ophthalmological Medicine / 2012 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 742186 |

Arif Abdulbaki, Faisal Al-Otaibi, Amal Almalki, Nasser Alohaly, Saleh Baeesa, "Transorbital Craniocerebral Occult Penetrating Injury with Cerebral Abscess Complication", Case Reports in Ophthalmological Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 742186, 6 pages, 2012.

Transorbital Craniocerebral Occult Penetrating Injury with Cerebral Abscess Complication

Academic Editor: C. J. MacEwen
Received13 Aug 2012
Accepted22 Sep 2012
Published14 Oct 2012


Transorbital intracranial penetrating injury is an uncommon mechanism of head injury. These injuries can be occult during the initial clinical presentation. Certain patients develop an intracranial cerebral infection. Herein, we report a 5-year-old child with an occult transorbital intracranial penetrating injury caused by a pen. A retained pen tip was found at the superior orbital roof and was not noticed at initial presentation. This was complicated by a right frontal lobe cerebral abscess. This paper emphasizes the importance of orbitocranial imaging in any penetrating orbital injury. A review of the literature on intracranial infection locations in relation to the route and mechanism of injury is included to complement this report.

1. Introduction

Transorbital penetrating craniocerebral injuries account for 24% of penetrating head injuries in adults and around 45% in children [1, 2]. This unusual injury is associated with intracranial complications, such as brain abscess, meningitis, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, hemorrhage, neurological deficit, and mortality [3]. Cerebral infection is found to be the most common cause of mortality [4]. There are thin bones in the skull, including the orbital walls, which are known to be access routes for slow-penetrating foreign bodies to enter the craniocerebral compartment. Different types of foreign bodies with variable transorbital routes of entry into the cranial cavity have been discussed in the literature [5]. Occult penetrating injuries happen when there is a small laceration at the orbital soft tissue without any other clinical findings. This lack of findings leads to delayed diagnosis of the foreign body injury, and, moreover, subsequent complications, such as a brain abscess, can occur. Here, we report a child who sustained a penetrating transorbital craniocerebral injury by a pen. Delayed diagnosis led to frontal abscess formation. The routes of injury and infection locations are discussed based on a review of the available literature.

2. Case Report

A 5-year-old female fell down on a pen while playing. The tip of the pen became lodged inside the right orbitocranial region. Her parents did not witness this injury initially, and there was no history of any neurological symptoms. At first, she was treated in a local clinic with simple suturing of the laceration at the upper eyelid (Figure 1). Four days later, she presented to a local hospital with orbital swelling without fever where she was found to have a retained orbitocranial foreign metallic body. She was started on antibiotics and subsequently referred to our hospital for further management. Upon arrival, she was complaining of pain from the right eye with no associated neurological symptomatology. On clinical examination, she was afebrile and all other vital signs were stable. Sutured laceration was noted at the superior medial upper eyelid. Ophthalmological examination revealed restriction of the upward gaze due to muscle entrapment; the globe was slightly pushed downward due to the swelling and muscle entrapment (Figure 1). No cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage was noted. She had a Glasgow coma score (GCS) of 15 with no neurological dysfunction. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the brain and orbits showed a 20 mm × 15 mm metallic foreign body attached in the medial portion of the right orbital roof, representing the pen tip (Figure 2). The foreign body’s distal end was penetrating the right frontal lobe inferior surface, whereas the proximal end was situated at the upper orbital cavity. A rim-like enhancement was seen at the frontal lobe around the foreign body tip suggestive of an abscess formation surrounded by cerebral edema (Figure 2). Her laboratory investigations did not reveal any leukocytosis in the blood, and the result of the blood culture was negative. The patient was kept on an antibiotic regiment of vancomycin, ceftazidime, and metronidazole.

After one day of being admitted to our hospital, she underwent foreign body removal and debridement of the brain abscess. Transcutaneous upper eyelid surgery was carried out by a team that included both oculoplastic and neurological surgeons. Upper eyelid skin crease was opened exploring the superior subperiosteal space, exposing the proximal end of the foreign body that comprised the pen’s metallic tip and pieces of glass from the pen’s shaft (Figure 3). The pen tip was attached to the superior orbital roof, and after removal, CSF leakage and minimal purulent discharge were noted. The dura was opened, and the pen tip penetrated the frontal lobe inferior surface. Ink from the pen was noted on the brain and orbital muscles. Debridement and irrigation were performed at the tract of the penetrating wound. A small piece of surgical patch was placed between the bone and the dural opening to prevent CSF leakage into the orbit. Finally, the wound was closed and dressing was applied (Figure 3).

Postoperatively, she had transient periorbital swelling. The culture from the brain abscess was negative. This was likely due to the antibiotic treatment initiated prior to this patient’s transfer to our hospital. Subsequently, she had full extraocular movement with improvement of the upper-gaze limitation, and the wound healed well. She was last seen 2 months after the surgery, and she was having mild right-eye ptosis. Her CT scan followup showed resolution of the brain abscess and edema after a course of 3 weeks of antibiotics (Figure 4).

3. Discussion

Penetrating cranial injury is an uncommon type of head injury. It constitutes 0.4% of all head injuries [16]. There are different routes for penetrating foreign bodies to enter the cranial cavity through the orbit. The most common route of entry is the superior orbital roof [5, 17]. Moreover, there are certain areas within the orbit that provide direct access to the intracranium, such as the superior orbital fissure, inferior orbital fissure, and optic canal. Turbin and colleagues analyzed the pattern of transorbital intracranial injury and divided the orbital surface into different zones [5]. These different routes of transorbital injury are associated with different locations of craniocerebral injury. Balasubramanian and colleagues classified transorbital penetrating injury based on the orbital bone’s anatomy and the associated injury [18]. This analysis of injury patterns could help in tailoring management and surgical approach, as well as in anticipating the potential type and site of intracranial complications related to foreign body penetration.

In certain cases of orbital penetrating injury, the foreign body might be missed and go undiagnosed. In such cases, eyelid laceration is sutured without further investigation [3]. This delayed diagnosis of the penetrating foreign body is usually associated with more complications, such as orbital cellulitis, cerebral abscess, meningitis, and even delayed neurological deterioration related to slowly expanding intracranial hematoma [5, 19]. Mortality has been reported to be high in old literatures due to infections and lack of optimal antimicrobial therapy [4]. Rarely, delayed diagnosis of a retained foreign body can be made after many years of the injury [8]. Therefore, early recognition of foreign bodies by appropriate radiological images will indeed prevent life-threatening complications. Based on several case reports and small case series, the most common site of cerebral abscess formation occurs around the distal tip of the foreign body [5]. These intracranial abscess formations can be distal from the orbit and located as far as the cerebellum and prepontine areas [10, 15]. Table 1 summarizes studies of transorbital penetrating injuries associated with cerebral infections.

Author (year)Age (year)SexRoute of entry into cranial cavity Foreign body typeCerebral abscess location and infection type Surgical approach Outcome findings

Seider et al. (2006) [6] 1 Maleorbital roof Pencil tip (made of graphite) Frontal lobe abscess
Frontal burr hole and orbitotomyRight upper eyelid ptosis
Maruya et al. (2002) [7]56 FemaleLateral orbital wall Bamboo fragments Left temporal lobe abscess Left frontotemporal craniotomy and orbito-zygomatic osteotomy Slight left-eye lateral gaze limitation
Aulino et al. (2005) [8]35 MaleLeft middle cranial fossa FiberglassAnterior left temporal lobe Left pterional craniotomyNo neurologic deficit
Santoreneos et al. (1997) [9]12 MaleSuperior orbital fissure Wooden foreign body (tree branch)Medial aspect of the right temporal lobe
Right fronto-temporal craniotomy
Right eye loss of vision due to trauma, ptosis, and seizure
Matsuyama et al. (2001) [10]1 MaleSuperior orbital fissureChopstickPrepontine area
Right frontolateral craniotomy No neurological deficits
di Roio et al.(2000) [11]6 MaleOrbital roof ChopstickLeft frontal lobe
Abscess aspirationNo documented abnormalities
Rahman et al. (1997) [12] 30 MaleSuperior orbital fissureNail Meningitis Extradural pterional craniotomy
Right-eye blindness
Potapov et al. (1996) [13] 26 Male Medial orbital wallWooden foreign body Right temporal lobe Fronto-temporal craniotomyLoss of visual function; right-sided ptosis
Specht et al. (1992) [14]9 MaleOptic canal Wooden golf tee Meningitis Fronto-temporal craniotomy Some weakness of the face and extremities on the left side
Amano and Kamano (1982) [15]7 MaleSuperior orbital fissure Bamboo stem Meningitis and right cerebellar abscess No surgery only antibiotics Gradual reduction the cerebellar abscess size
Present case
Orbital roof
Frontal lobe abscess
Transcutaneous upper eyelid approachMild right-eye ptosis

Surgical approaches are tailored according to the intracranial- and intraorbital-associated injuries and types of complications. In our case, we elected to approach the foreign body through the upper eyelid (oculoplastic approach) and debride the tract of the penetrating wound from the eyelid to the intracranial distal part. Furthermore, the base of the foreign body was attached to the superior orbital roof with the base in the orbit and tip within the frontal lobe. The small cerebral abscess was drained using this approach. The surgical culture was negative in our patient. This is likely due to the use of antibiotics prior to transfer to our hospital. In the literature, the commonly reported pathogens for abscess formation or meningitis are Streptococcus and Staphylococcus [5]. In general, the overall outcome of this type of injury is dependent on the degree and types of damage caused by the foreign body penetration. However, early recognition would prevent complications that can be life threatening.

4. Conclusion

Occult transorbital intracranial penetrating injury is an unusual form of trauma that is associated with significant morbidity. High suspension index of the presence of retained foreign body is mandatory in emergency medicine and appropriate radiological images should be considered.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


  1. T. Yamaguchi, H. Hata, and Y. Suganuma, “Penetrating transorbital brain injury and intracranial foreign body,” Neurological Surgery, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 179–184, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. Kasamo, T. Asakura, K. Kusumoto et al., “Transorbital penetrating brain injury,” Neurological Surgery, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 433–438, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  3. L. A. Bard and W. H. Jarrett, “Intracranial complications of penetrating orbital injuries,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 71, pp. 332–343, 1964. View at: Google Scholar
  4. D. M. Bursick and R. G. Selker, “Intracranial pencil injuries,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 427–431, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  5. R. E. Turbin, D. N. Maxwell, P. D. Langer et al., “Patterns of transorbital intracranial injury: a review and comparison of occult and non-occult cases,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 449–460, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. Seider, M. Gilboa, E. Lautman, and B. Miller, “Delayed presentation of orbito-cerebral abscess caused by pencil-tip injury,” Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 316–317, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Maruya, K. Yamamoto, M. Wakai, and U. Kaneko, “Brain abscess following transorbital penetrating injury due to bamboo fragments—case report,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 143–146, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  8. J. M. Aulino, K. A. Gyure, A. Morton, and J. W. Cole, “Temporal lobe intraparenchymal retained foreign body from remote orbital trauma,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1855–1857, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  9. S. Santoreneos, A. Hanieh, and L. Moore, “'Splinter in the mind': a case of penetrating periorbital injury,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 255–257, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  10. T. Matsuyama, K. Okuchi, K. Nogami, M. Hata, and Y. Murao, “Transorbital penetrating injury by a chopstick,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 345–348, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  11. C. di Roio, C. Jourdan, C. Mottolese, J. Convert, and F. Artru, “Craniocerebral injury resulting from transorbital stick penetration in children,” Child's Nervous System, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 503–506, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. U. Rahman, A. Jamjoom, Z. A. B. Jamjoom, and A. A. El-Asrar, “Orbito-cranial injury caused by penetrating metallic foreign bodies: report of two cases,” International Ophthalmology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. A. Potapov, S. V. Eropkin, V. N. Kornienko et al., “Late diagnosis and removal of a large wooden foreign body in the cranio-orbital region,” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 311–314, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  14. C. S. Specht, J. H. Varga, M. M. Jalali, and J. P. Edelstein, “Orbitocranial wooden foreign body diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging. Dry wood can be isodense with air and orbital fat by computed tomography,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 341–344, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. Amano and S. Kamano, “Cerebellar abscess due to penetrating orbital wound,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1163–1166, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  16. T. A. Gennarelli, H. R. Champion, W. J. Sacco, W. S. Copes, and W. M. Alves, “Mortality of patients with head injury and extracranial injury treated in trauma centers,” The Journal of Trauma, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1193–1201, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  17. H. L. Lin, H. C. Lee, and D. Y. Cho, “Management of transorbital brain injury,” Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 36–38, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  18. C. Balasubramanian, C. Kaliaperumal, C. K. Jadun, and P. S. Dias, “Transorbital intracranial penetrating injury-an anatomical classification,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 238–240, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. W. P. Vandertop, W. B. de Vries, J. van Swieten, and L. M. P. Ramos, “Recurrent brain abscess due to an unexpected foreign body,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 39–41, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Arif Abdulbaki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.