Case Reports in Ophthalmological Medicine

Case Reports in Ophthalmological Medicine / 2014 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 132565 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/132565

Mariana Harasawa, Hugo Quiroz-Mercado, Guillermo Salcedo-Villanueva, Gerardo Garcia-Aguirre, Shulamit Schwartz, "Inner Segment Ellipsoid Band and Cone Outer Segment Tips Changes Preceding Macular Hole Development in a Young Patient", Case Reports in Ophthalmological Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 132565, 3 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/132565

Inner Segment Ellipsoid Band and Cone Outer Segment Tips Changes Preceding Macular Hole Development in a Young Patient

Academic Editor: J. Fernando Arevalo
Received24 Jun 2014
Revised20 Nov 2014
Accepted20 Nov 2014
Published04 Dec 2014

Abstract

Purpose. Pathophysiology of macular hole (MH) is not yet well defined but the advances of spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) give us access to further detailed imaging. We report a case with macular inner segment ellipsoid (ISe) band loss and cone outer segment tips (COST) line changes seen in SD-OCT preceding MH appearance in a young patient. Methods. 21-year-old woman presented with a partial central scotoma, metamorphopsia, and a 20/25 vision in her right eye. Past medical history was positive for laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery 7 months ago with no complications. Macular SD-OCT showed ISe band loss and COST line elevation. She was followed a month later with visual acuity deteriorating to 20/200 and a full thickness MH. Results. The patient underwent a pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. Her visual acuity 2 months later was 20/20. Conclusion. SD-OCT can identify preliminary changes, yet to be described, preceding MH formation. Our patient demonstrated ISe band loss and COST abnormalities on SD-OCT a month prior to MH development. SD-OCT should be considered in young patients with subtle visual symptoms and mild changes in visual acuity that are not readily explained by ophthalmological exam.

1. Introduction

Macular hole (MH) is an idiopathic condition that in most cases is related to posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and is mainly seen in the elderly. The minority of cases are observed in younger patients with a history of blunt ocular trauma as well as in myopic patients after laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery [1, 2].

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) provides further detailed imaging that allows the detection of early anatomical changes, enabling us to alter and/or refine current theories.

Different pathophysiological mechanisms might be involved in MH formation depending on vitreous syneresis and posterior hyaloid status. Several theories have emerged involving tangential traction [3] and anterior-posterior traction [4, 5]. The exact pathogenesis remains unclear but it is broadly believed to have a strong relationship with the vitreous traction exerted on the fovea. As a consequence, several anatomical changes have been described as the primary findings in the macular hole development such as intraretinal split, foveal pseudocyst, and foveolar detachment [57].

We report a case of a young patient who at first presented with subtle visual symptoms on the right eye. Her SD-OCT showed changes in the inner segment (ISe) band and cone outer segment tips (COST) line preceding MH formation in the absence of any vitreomacular interface abnormality in the ophthalmological examination.

2. Material and Methods

A 21-year-old female patient presented to the retina clinic with a new onset of partial central scotoma and metamorphopsia in her right eye (RE). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the RE was 20/25. Left eye (LE) was asymptomatic with BCVA of 20/20. She had no history of trauma and reported having a successful LASIK surgery in both eyes seven months earlier with BCVA of 20/20 in both eyes after surgery. She had a positive ocular family history, with her father being operated for a unilateral idiopathic MH. Dilated fundus examination did not reveal any retinal findings in both eyes. Therefore, a SD-OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg/Germany) was performed and showed an ISe band loss and COST line changes at the subfoveal area with no other findings in the RE (Figure 1). She was followed a month later complaining of decreased vision on her RE and a larger central scotoma. BCVA of the RE was 20/200 and dilated eye exam showed a full thickness macular hole (FTMH). On SD-OCT, there was a stage 3 macular hole (Figure 2). The LE had a BCVA of 20/20, no apparent abnormalities on examination, and intact ISe band and COST line on SD-OCT.

3. Results

A 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy was performed in the RE. The posterior hyaloid was found to be very adherent and the surgeon faced difficulties trying to induce a PVD using high aspiration with the vitrector probe. A brilliant blue stain was injected to facilitate the visualization of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) on the margins of the macula (Figure 3). The ILM was identified and eventually peeled en bloc with the posterior hyaloid from an edge close to the foveal center. Gas tamponade with SF6 12% was used at the end of the operation with the patient facing down. The patient’s BCVA two months after the operation was 20/20 with no residual symptoms.

4. Discussion

Gass studied the pathophysiology of MH and suggested that the majority of macular holes begin as a central dehiscence with little loss of retinal tissue following tangential traction [8]. Biomicroscopy usually detects a foveal pseudocyst, radial striae, a yellow spot or ring, or a combination of these findings in stage 1 impending hole. On OCT, the cystoid space occupies the inner part of the foveal tissue and can extend posteriorly to disrupt the outer retinal layers [7].

Studies by SD-OCT showed minor changes in the outer foveolar structure, especially in the COST line, in either eyes with a foveolar yellow spot or eyes with vitreomacular traction [9, 10]. We showed an interruption of the retinal tissue at the level of the ISe and COST line on SD-OCT a month before FTMH appearance, but our case did not show any abnormality in ophthalmoscopy. These mild changes were detected due to the patient’s complaint of a discrete central scotoma with minimal visual impairment that could be imperceptive to other patients. Moreover, our patient did not have a PVD on examination with a very adherent posterior hyaloid during vitrectomy. Uemura et al. found that a focal vitreomacular attachment with anteroposterior traction on the foveal surface plays an important role in the elevation of the COST line. They observed that the elevation of the COST layer spontaneously resolved after vitreomacular separation indicating a strong relationship between elevation of COST line and vitreomacular traction [11].

We speculate that the strong vitreomacular adherence observed during vitrectomy might have induced vitreoretinal interface changes that caused changes in the outer retina with no apparent signs of traction on ophthalmoscopy. In patients with a strong vitreomacular adhesion, ISe band loss and COST line changes on SD-OCT may be a harbinger for MH formation; these patients should be followed closely. We are unaware of any publications on OCT changes preceding MH formation in young patient as we described with normal fundus examination.

There is a higher incidence of MH in patients with a positive familial history of MH, suggesting the involvement of genetic factors [12]. Our patient had a father with a diagnosis of idiopathic MH that might also imply her MH formation.

Although there are reports of MH cases after LASIK surgery [2], we believe that this case was not related to the prior LASIK surgery because of the 7-month interval between surgery and MH formation.

In conclusion, SD-OCT can identify preliminary changes at the level of the foveal ISe band and COST line preceding MH formation. Therefore, it should be considered in young patients with subtle visual symptoms and mild changes in visual acuity that are not readily explained by ophthalmological examination.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. A. J. Singh, M. M. K. Muqit, and W. H. Woon, “Is axial length a risk factor for idiopathic macular hole formation?” International Ophthalmology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 393–396, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. F. Arevalo, A. J. Mendoza, W. Velez-Vazquez et al., “Full-thickness macular hole after LASIK for the correction of myopia,” Ophthalmology, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 1207–1212, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. D. M. Gass, “Idiopathic senile macular hole. Its early stages and pathogenesis,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 629–639, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. P. Avila, A. E. Jalkh, K. Murakami, C. L. Trempe, and C. L. Schepens, “Biomicroscopic study of the vitreous in macular breaks,” Ophthalmology, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 1277–1283, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Gaudric, B. Haouchine, P. Massin, M. Paques, P. Blain, and A. Erginay, “Macular hole formation: new data provided by optical coherence tomography,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 744–751, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Kishi and H. Takahashi, “Three-dimensional observations of developing macular holes,” The American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 65–75, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. B. Haouchine, P. Massin, and A. Gaudric, “Foveal pseudocyst as the first step in macular hole formation: a prospective study by optical coherence tomography,” Ophthalmology, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. D. Gass, “Reappraisal of biomicroscopic classification of stages of development of a macular hole,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 752–759, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Takahashi, T. Nagaoka, and A. Yoshida, “Stage 1-A macular hole: a prospective spectral-domain optical coherence tomography study,” Retina, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 127–147, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Tsunoda, K. Watanabe, K. Akiyama, T. Usui, and T. Noda, “Highly reflective foveal region in optical coherence tomography in eyes with vitreomacular traction or epiretinal membrane,” Ophthalmology, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 581–587, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Uemura, F. Otsuji, T. Nakano, and T. Sakamoto, “Vitreomacular interface and outer foveal microstructure in fellow eyes of patients with unilateral macular holes,” Retina, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1229–1234, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. N. Kay, P. R. Pavan, L. B. Small, T. Zhang, G. K. Zamba, and S. M. Cohen, “Familial trends in a population with macular holes,” Retina, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 754–759, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Mariana Harasawa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1244
Downloads475
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.