Case Report | Open Access
Detailed Morphological Changes of Foveoschisis in Patient with X-Linked Retinoschisis Detected by SD-OCT and Adaptive Optics Fundus Camera
Purpose. To report the morphological and functional changes associated with a regression of foveoschisis in a patient with X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS). Methods. A 42-year-old man with XLRS underwent genetic analysis and detailed ophthalmic examinations. Functional assessments included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), full-field electroretinograms (ERGs), and multifocal ERGs (mfERGs). Morphological assessments included fundus photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and adaptive optics (AO) fundus imaging. After the baseline clinical data were obtained, topical dorzolamide was applied to the patient. The patient was followed for 24 months. Results. A reported RS1 gene mutation was found (P203L) in the patient. At the baseline, his decimal BCVA was 0.15 in the right and 0.3 in the left eye. Fundus photographs showed bilateral spoke wheel-appearing maculopathy. SD-OCT confirmed the foveoschisis in the left eye. The AO images of the left eye showed spoke wheel retinal folds, and the folds were thinner than those in fundus photographs. During the follow-up period, the foveal thickness in the SD-OCT images and the number of retinal folds in the AO images were reduced. Conclusions. We have presented the detailed morphological changes of foveoschisis in a patient with XLRS detected by SD-OCT and AO fundus camera. However, the findings do not indicate whether the changes were influenced by topical dorzolamide or the natural history.
X-linked juvenile retinoschisis (XLRS) is the most common inherited retinal dystrophy in males with an estimated prevalence at 1 : 5,000 to 1 : 20,000 [1, 2]. Mutations of the retinoschisis (RS1) gene are responsible for this disease . XLRS is characterized by the presence of foveomacular cavities in the inner retina and a spoke wheel pattern of the retinoschisis in the macular area . Recent reports suggest that carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) administered topically or systemically can alleviate the maculopathy and improve the vision in approximately two-thirds of the patients [4–7].
Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and adaptive optics (AO) fundus photography can obtain high-resolution images of diseased eyes that allow the detection of the early morphological changes of the retina.
We examined a man who was diagnosed with XLRS and followed the changes accompanying the reduction of his foveoschisis by both the SD-OCT and the AO fundus photography.
The protocol of this study conformed to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Nippon Medical School. A signed written informed consent was obtained from patient after the nature and possible consequences of the study were explained. We had only one XLRS patient with foveoschisis to examine after the IRB approval. The patient was treated with topical dorzolamide, and it is still continued.
Blood samples were collected from the patient, and genomic DNA was isolated from the peripheral white blood cells using a blood DNA isolation kit (NucleoSpin Blood XL, Macherey Nagel, Germany). The DNA was used as the template to amplify the RS1 gene. The coding regions and flanking introns of the RS1 gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using published primers  synthesized by Greiner Bio-One (Tokyo, Japan). The PCR products were purified (ExoSAP-IT,; USB Corp., USA) and were used as the template for sequencing. Both strands were sequenced on an automated sequencer (Bio Matrix Research, Chiba, Japan).
The ophthalmological examinations included measurements of the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), measurements of the refractive error, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy, full-field electroretinograms (ERGs), multifocal ERGs (mfERGs), perimetry, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, SD-OCT, and AO imaging. Full-field scotopic and photopic ERGs were recorded using an extended testing protocol incorporating the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision standards. The ERGs were elicited and recorded with a LED built-in electrode (LE2000, Tomey, Japan) . The mfERGs were recorded using a commercial mfERG system (VERIS Science, Electro-Diagnostic Imaging, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) [9, 10]. The visual fields were determined by Goldmann perimetry. The FAF images were acquired with the TRC-NW8Fplus (TOPCON, Tokyo, Japan), and the SD-OCT images were acquired with a Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec). The foveal thickness in the SD-OCT images was determined by a built-in measurement software. High-resolution fundus images were taken with the infrared AO retinal camera (rtx1, Imagine Eyes, Orsay, France). A detailed description on the use of this system to obtain images of individual cone photoreceptors was presented in detail earlier [11–16]. Briefly, the AO fundus camera illuminates a 4-degree square field with 850 nm infrared flashes to acquire en face images of the retina with a transverse optical resolution of 250 line pairs/mm. Successive AO images were taken at adjacent retinal locations with an angular overlap of 2 degrees in the horizontal and vertical directions. The resulting images were stitched together by superimposing retinal vessel landmarks with an image editing software (Photoshop, Adobe Corporation, Mountain View, CA; GIMP, The GIMP Development Team; ImageJ, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD). The pixel size of the images was typically 0.8 μm when calculated at the retinal plane, and the value was adjusted for individual variations in the axial length of the eye . The number and the mean width of retinal folds in AO were obtained at 500 μm from the foveal center. The mean width of radial white line in the spoke wheel pattern in fundus photographs was also measured at 500 μm from the foveal center.
The patient was a 42-year-old man who was initially diagnosed with XLRS in another hospital at the age of 30 years. Mutation analysis of the RS1 gene found a missense mutation, c.608 C>T, in exon 6 with a substitution of leucine for proline at amino acid 203. This mutation has been reported in earlier reports on patients with XLRS [18, 19]. His older brother was also diagnosed with XLRS with the same mutation, and he had bilateral central atrophy without foveoschisis in the fundus photographs and SD-OCT images.
The decimal best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of our patient was 0.15 in the right eye and 0.3 in the left eye. The intraocular pressure and anterior ocular segments were normal in both eyes. The amplitudes of both the cone and the rod full-field ERGs were reduced, and the waveforms were similar in both eyes. The dark-adapted 3.0 b wave of the ERG had a negative-type pattern in both eyes (Figure 1). The amplitudes of the mfERGs were reduced in the fovea and also in the peripheral areas in both eyes (Figure 2). Goldmann visual field examination showed the presence of central scotomas in both eyes.
Fundus examination showed spoke wheel-like maculopathy in the left eye and central atrophy in the right eye (Figure 3). The mean width of radial white lines in the spoke wheel pattern in the fundus photographs was μm at 500 μm from the foveal center in his left eye. Peripheral retinoschisis was not observed in both eyes. FAF imaging showed a hypofluorescent lesion in the macula of both eyes (Figure 3). The SD-OCT images showed a thinning of the total retinal thickness in right eye and foveoschisis mainly at the inner nuclear layer of the left eye. The ellipsoid and interdigitation zones were not detected in the fovea of the SD-OCT images of both eyes. The structure of inner nuclear layer, inner plexiform layer, and ganglion cell layer in the right eye was relatively preserved (Figure 4). Examination of a montage of the AO images of the left eye showed a spoke wheel pattern of retinal folds which had a thin inner retinal cavity possibly caused by the foveoschisis in the inner retinal layer (Figure 5). These folds were not present in the right eye (Figure 5). The width of spoke wheel retinal folds in the AO image in the left eye was thinner than that in the fundus photographs (Figures 3 and 5, Table 1). The cone mosaic was not clearly resolved throughout the retinal region, in which the ellipsoid and interdigitation zones were undetectable in SD-OCT images.
|Best-corrected visual acuity.|
#2Number and mean width of folds in AO are obtained at 500 μm from the foveal center.
#3Mean ± standard deviation.
#4No significant difference compared with baseline (paired -test).
The left eye of the patient was treated with topical 2% dorzolamide three times/day, and the time course of the changes in the BCVA from the baseline is shown in Table 1. The amplitude of full-field (14 months from the baseline) and mfERGs (24 months from the baseline) was not changed during the posttreatment times (Figures 1 and 2).
Morphologically, cystoid macular edema in his left fundus became undetectable at the center of the fovea in 14 months from the baseline. The time course of the SD-OCT images showed a reduction of the retinal fluid and the foveal thickness in the left eye (Figure 4, Table 1). The number of the retinal folds in the AO images of his left eye was fewer than that at the baseline during the follow-up period (Figure 6, Table 1).
In our patient with XLRS, we observed an improvement of the foveoschisis in the OCT images during the follow-up period, but the BCVA and the ERGs at the final visit were not better than those at the baseline. Topical and oral forms of CAIs have been demonstrated to also improve the BCVA and the macular cyst-like cavities in some cases of XLRS as documented by OCT [4–7]. We should be careful to interpret these results because Lesch et al. reported that the characteristics of the disease change from the schisis to the atrophic pattern after the second decade of the life . It has also been shown that foveal thickness can fluctuate over time and these changes are not correlated with the functional changes . The foveal photoreceptors might have already been potentially impaired by the chronic edema in our patient. This is supported by the disruption of the ellipsoid and interdigitation zones observed in the SD-OCT image at the baseline.
We should also be careful when we use dorzolamide for XLRS patients because Genead et al. stated that patients with XLRS who are receiving dorzolamide should be monitored for a potential rebound of their macular cysts or a lack of response during treatment .
This is the first study to show a spoke wheel pattern of the foveoschisis observed in the AO images. The regression of the number of the folds in the AO images corresponded to the regression of the foveoschisis observed by OCT. This observation supports our conclusion that the retinal folds observed in the AO fundus images were caused by foveoschisis.
We have presented the high-resolution morphological changes of foveoschisis in a XLRS patient detected by SD-OCT and AO fundus camera. Unfortunately, we are not able to conclude whether the changes were influenced by dorzolamide or the natural history of the disease process because this is only one case. Both high-resolution morphological and functional analyses of a larger number of XLRS patients are needed to understand the relationship between the microstructural and functional effects of foveoschisis in retina. Further studies should help in determining this relationship.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests associated with this paper.
The authors thank Professor Emeritus Duco Hamsaki of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, for discussions and editing their paper.
- J. Haas, “Ueber das Zusammenvorkommen von Veraenderungen der Retina und Choroidea,” Archiv für Augenheilkunde, vol. 37, pp. 343–348, 1898.
- N. D. L. George, J. R. W. Yates, and A. T. Moore, “X linked retinoschisis,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 79, no. 7, pp. 697–702, 1995.
- C. G. Sauer, A. Gehrig, R. Warneke-Wittstock et al., “Positional cloning of the gene associated with X-linked juvenile retinoschisis,” Nature Genetics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 164–170, 1997.
- M. A. Apushkin and G. A. Fishman, “Use of dorzolamide for patients with X-linked retinoschisis,” Retina, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 741–745, 2006.
- M. Ghajarnia and M. B. Gorin, “Acetazolamide in the treatment of X-linked retinoschisis maculopathy,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 571–573, 2007.
- S. Walia, G. A. Fishman, R. S. Molday et al., “Relation of response to treatment with dorzolamide in X-linked retinoschisis to the mechanism of functional loss in retinoschisin,” The American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 111–115, 2009.
- M. A. Genead, G. A. Fishman, and S. Walia, “Efficacy of sustained topical dorzolamide therapy for cystic macular lesions in patients with X-linked retinoschisis,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 190–197, 2010.
- M. Bach, M. G. Brigell, M. Hawlina et al., “ISCEV standard for clinical pattern electroretinography (PERG): 2012 update,” Documenta Ophthalmologica, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2013.
- E. E. Sutter and D. Tran, “The field topography of ERG components in man-I. The photopic luminance response,” Vision Research, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 433–446, 1992.
- M. A. Bearse Jr. and E. E. Sutter, “Imaging localized retinal dysfunction with the multifocal electroretinogram,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 634–640, 1996.
- K. Gocho, S. Kameya, K. Akeo et al., “High-resolution imaging of patients with bietti crystalline dystrophy with CYP4V2 mutation,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2014, Article ID 283603, 12 pages, 2014.
- M. Lombardo, G. Lombardo, P. Ducoli, and S. Serrao, “Adaptive optics photoreceptor imaging,” Ophthalmology, vol. 119, no. 7, pp. 1498–1498.e2, 2012.
- M. Lombardo, S. Serrao, P. Ducoli, and G. Lombardo, “Variations in image optical quality of the eye and the sampling limit of resolution of the cone mosaic with axial length in young adults,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1147–1155, 2012.
- M. Lombardo, S. Serrao, N. Devaney, M. Parravano, and G. Lombardo, “Adaptive optics technology for high-resolution retinal imaging,” Sensors, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 334–366, 2013.
- K. Gocho, S. Kikuchi, T. Kabuto et al., “High-resolution en face images of microcystic macular edema in patients with autosomal dominant optic atrophy,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 676803, 12 pages, 2013.
- M.-H. Errera, S. Coisy, C. Fardeau et al., “Retinal vasculitis imaging by adaptive optics,” Ophthalmology, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 1311.e2–1312.e2, 2014.
- A. G. Bennett, A. R. Rudnicka, and D. F. Edgar, “Improvements on Littmann's method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 232, no. 6, pp. 361–367, 1994.
- “Functional implications of the spectrum of mutations found in 234 cases with X-linkedjuvenile retinoschisis. The Retinoschisis Consortium,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 7, pp. 1185–1192, 1998.
- Y. V. Sergeev, R. C. Caruso, M. R. Meltzer, N. Smaoui, I. M. MacDonald, and P. A. Sieving, “Molecular modeling of retinoschisin with functional analysis of pathogenic mutations from human X-linked retinoschisis,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 19, no. 7, Article ID ddq006, pp. 1302–1313, 2010.
- B. Lesch, V. Szabó, M. Kánya et al., “Clinical and genetic findings in Hungarian patients with X-linked juvenile retinoschisis,” Molecular Vision, vol. 14, pp. 2321–2332, 2008.
- B. G. Jeffrey, C. A. Cukras, S. Vitale, A. Turriff, K. Bowles, and P. A. Sieving, “Test–retest intervisit variability of functional and structural parameters in X-linked retinoschisis,” Translational Vision Science & Technology, vol. 3, no. 5, article 5, 2014.
Copyright © 2015 Keiichiro Akeo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.