Full-Thickness Macular Hole Formation after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling: Beware the “<i>Omega Sign</i>”

Sisk, Robert A.; Toygar, Okan

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9858291

Case Reports in Ophthalmological Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Discussion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2016 | Article ID 9858291 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9858291

Full-Thickness Macular Hole Formation after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling: Beware the “Omega Sign”

Robert A. Sisk^1,2and Okan Toygar^1,3

Academic Editor: Cristiano Giusti

Received06 Jul 2016

Accepted28 Aug 2016

Published25 Sept 2016

Abstract

Purpose. To introduce a clinical sign on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT), which may indicate high risk for full-thickness macular hole formation after internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Methods. The preoperative SDOCT images of two patients—one with multilaminar hemorrhage from ruptured retinal artery macroaneurysm and one with serous retinal detachment and severe macular schisis from optic pit maculopathy—who developed full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) after ILM peeling were evaluated retrospectively. Results. On the preoperative SDOCT images of both patients there was a thin bridge of tissue on either side of the foveal center with an outer retinal defect. The photoreceptors were displaced laterally away from the foveal center to create an “omega-” shaped configuration of the remaining tissue. Conclusion. “Omega-” shaped configuration on SDOCT may represent a higher risk of FTMH following ILM peeling. Vitreoretinal surgeons may wish to consider this sign in the process of their surgical decision making.

1. Introduction

Peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) has become a preferred technique in the surgical treatment of miscellaneous macular disorders [1]. However, removal of the ILM over the fovea induces permanent anatomical changes, and the consequences are not fully understood [2, 3]. Histologic examinations of excised ILM specimens contained fragments of Müller cells. Gass hypothesized that the pathogenesis of idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) formation was disruption of the Müller cell cone (MCC) [4], which may occur iatrogenically during ILM peeling.

In this report we introduce a clinical sign on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) which may indicate high risk for FTMH formation after ILM peeling.

2. Case 1

A 91-year-old hypertensive woman presented with sudden onset of central scotoma and 20/200 vision due to multilaminar hemorrhage from ruptured retinal artery macroaneurysm OD. Subretinal blood extended beneath the fovea. Arthritis limited face-down positioning for pneumatic displacement, so pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and subretinal tissue plasminogen activator injection were performed. The ILM was peeled to liberate trapped sub-ILM hematoma. Figure 1 demonstrates the preoperative and postoperative SDOCT images. Postoperatively she had localized serous and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) from FTMH. The patient refused silicone oil and underwent PPV with temporal relaxing retinotomy and 16% C3F8 tamponade. Five months later FTMH was persisting and the visual acuity was 20/200.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 1

(a) Infrared reference image and (b) foveal spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) raster scan of the right macula. (c) Subretinal hemorrhage displaced outer retinal tissue laterally to produce an “omega-” shaped contour for the outer retina superimposed as yellow on same SDOCT raster scan. (d) Foveal SDOCT raster scan after PPV with subretinal tissue plasminogen activator and ILM peeling that included the fovea, which had resulted postoperatively in macular hole with serous and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment that failed to clear spontaneously. (e) Foveal SDOCT raster scan five months postoperatively demonstrates persistent macular hole and temporal sealed retinotomy with underlying subretinal hyperreflective material and transmission due to retinal atrophy.

3. Case 2

A 66-year-old woman presented with serous RD and severe macular schisis from optic pit maculopathy OD. Her visual acuity was finger counting and she complained of a central scotoma for several years. Pars plana vitrectomy, ILM peeling, and long-acting gas tamponade were performed with face-down positioning postoperatively. Figure 2 demonstrates the preoperative and postoperative SDOCT images. Six weeks after the surgery visual acuity improved to 20/400 but FTMH occurred, which was closed with a following PPV and silicone oil tamponade. One year later, after silicone oil was removed, the FTMH remained closed, schisis had resolved, and visual acuity improved to 20/125.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 2

(a) Infrared reference image and (b) foveal SDOCT raster scan of the right macula. Infrared imaging showed hyperintensity within areas of nasal macular schisis within Henle’s layer and hypointensity in areas temporally with serous retinal detachment. The foveal center appears hyperintense from transmission defect. Schisis involved the photoreceptor and outer plexiform layers with intact nerve fiber layer. (c) Lateral displacement of the photoreceptors produced the “omega sign” on SDOCT, highlighted in yellow, indicating that only the Müller cell cone was bridging the foveola. (d) SDOCT foveal raster scan six weeks after PPV with ILM peeling shows FTMH 5 contiguous with resolving schisis cavity nasally. (e) One year later, after silicone oil was removed, the FTMH remained closed; schisis had resolved. Thinning and disorganization linger among layers previously affected by severe schisis.

4. Discussion

Both cases demonstrate the necessity of the MCC for structural integrity of the fovea when a prominent outer retinal defect and localized serous or hemorrhagic RD are present. The bridging tissue over the foveola and lateral displacement of the photoreceptor band produced a horseshoe-shaped configuration that we termed the “omega sign.” Preoperative recognition of this sign on SDOCT should warn surgeons against ILM peeling over the fovea, which may result in FTMH. Although the report of the bridging tissue is not novel, the risk of creating a macular hole by peeling it has not been well described. The more common situation for the bridging tissue is tractional foveoschisis in myopic eyes. In the study conducted by Kim et al., among the 17 eyes, macular hole was found in two eyes, where one of these eyes developed a macular hole with retinal detachment at 16 months after ILM peeling [5]. Similarly in another study, among 15 eyes, macular hole was seen in two eyes after ILM peeling [6]. Our cases both describe exudative diseases (hemorrhage and optic pit maculopathy), which occur with a different mechanism than myopic foveoschisis. The caution about peeling however is pertinent to all those situations. In cases where ILM peeling is still deemed necessary, fovea-sparing ILM peeling can reduce the risk of macular hole formation [7, 8]. Intraoperative SDOCT may identify occult FTMH and help determine the need for tamponade and postoperative positioning for hole closure [9].

Vitreoretinal surgeons may wish to consider “omega sign” in the process of their surgical decision making and surgical planning. This may reduce the threshold for ILM peeling in these patients.

Competing Interests

The authors have no financial interests in the contents of this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness to James Augsburger, M.D., Chairman of the University of Cincinnati Department of Ophthalmology, Cincinnati, Ohio.

References

A. Almony, E. Nudleman, G. K. Shah et al., “Techniques, rationale, and outcomes of internal limiting membrane peeling,” Retina, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 877–891, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nakamura, T. Murata, T. Hisatomi et al., “Ultrastructure of the vitreoretinal interface following the removal of the internal limiting membrane using indocyanine green,” Current Eye Research, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 395–399, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Terasaki, Y. Miyake, R. Nomura et al., “Focal macular ERGs in eyes after removal of macular ILM during macular hole surgery,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 229–234, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
J. D. M. Gass, “Müller cell cone, an overlooked part of the anatomy of the fovea centralis: hypotheses concerning its role in the pathogenesis of macular hole and foveomacular retinoschisis,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 821–823, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Kim, S. B. Lee, and W. K. Lee, “Vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling with and without gas tamponade for myopic foveoschisis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 320–326.e1, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Lim, Y. H. Kwon, S. H. Kim, Y. S. You, and O. W. Kwon, “Vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling without gas tamponade for myopic foveoschisis,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 250, no. 11, pp. 1573–1577, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T.-C. Ho, M.-S. Chen, J.-S. Huang, Y.-F. Shih, H. Ho, and Y.-H. Huang, “Foveola nonpeeling technique in internal limiting membrane peeling of myopic foveoschisis surgery,” Retina, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 631–634, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Shimada, Y. Sugamoto, M. Ogawa, H. Takase, and K. Ohno-Matsui, “Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic traction maculopathy,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 154, no. 4, pp. 693–701, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Ehlers, T. Tam, P. K. Kaiser, D. F. Martin, G. M. Smith, and S. K. Srivastava, “Utility of intraoperative optical coherence tomography during vitrectomy surgery for vitreomacular traction syndrome,” Retina, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1341–1346, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2016 Robert A. Sisk and Okan Toygar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

938

Downloads

1087

Citations