Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Ophthalmological Medicine
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 9858291, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9858291
Case Report

Full-Thickness Macular Hole Formation after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling: Beware the “Omega Sign

1Cincinnati Eye Institute, Cincinnati, OH, USA
2Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
3Department of Ophthalmology, Bahcesehir University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

Received 6 July 2016; Accepted 28 August 2016

Academic Editor: Cristiano Giusti

Copyright © 2016 Robert A. Sisk and Okan Toygar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Almony, E. Nudleman, G. K. Shah et al., “Techniques, rationale, and outcomes of internal limiting membrane peeling,” Retina, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 877–891, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Nakamura, T. Murata, T. Hisatomi et al., “Ultrastructure of the vitreoretinal interface following the removal of the internal limiting membrane using indocyanine green,” Current Eye Research, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 395–399, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Terasaki, Y. Miyake, R. Nomura et al., “Focal macular ERGs in eyes after removal of macular ILM during macular hole surgery,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 229–234, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. D. M. Gass, “Müller cell cone, an overlooked part of the anatomy of the fovea centralis: hypotheses concerning its role in the pathogenesis of macular hole and foveomacular retinoschisis,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 821–823, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. S. Kim, S. B. Lee, and W. K. Lee, “Vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling with and without gas tamponade for myopic foveoschisis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 320–326.e1, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. J. Lim, Y. H. Kwon, S. H. Kim, Y. S. You, and O. W. Kwon, “Vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling without gas tamponade for myopic foveoschisis,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 250, no. 11, pp. 1573–1577, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T.-C. Ho, M.-S. Chen, J.-S. Huang, Y.-F. Shih, H. Ho, and Y.-H. Huang, “Foveola nonpeeling technique in internal limiting membrane peeling of myopic foveoschisis surgery,” Retina, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 631–634, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Shimada, Y. Sugamoto, M. Ogawa, H. Takase, and K. Ohno-Matsui, “Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic traction maculopathy,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 154, no. 4, pp. 693–701, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. P. Ehlers, T. Tam, P. K. Kaiser, D. F. Martin, G. M. Smith, and S. K. Srivastava, “Utility of intraoperative optical coherence tomography during vitrectomy surgery for vitreomacular traction syndrome,” Retina, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1341–1346, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus