Case Report
Delayed Reconstruction by Total Calcaneal Allograft following Calcanectomy: Is It an Option?
Table 1
Review of the literature of the different options of reconstruction following calcanectomy.
| Authors | Date | NC | Surgery | Characteristics | MSTS (%) | AOFAS | FU (y) |
| Imanishi and Choong [9] | 2015 | 1 | Calcaneal prosthesis | No tumor recurrence | / | 82 | 0.4 | Li and Wang [5] | 2014 | 5-4 | Allograft + pediculated composite fibular flap versus amputation | No local tumor recurrence | 74–83 | / | 3.5 | Li et al. [2] | 2012 | 4 | Allograft + pediculated composite fibular flap | 2 local repeated surgeries No tumor recurrence | 93 | 80–95 | 2 | Li et al. [6] | 2010 | 5 | Pediculated composite fibular flap | 2 local repeated surgeries No tumor recurrence | 93 | 80–95 | 4.2 | Scoccianti et al. [7] | 2009 | 2 | Free composite iliac flap | 1 fracture No tumor recurrence | / | / | 7.1 | Kurvin et al. [8] | 2008 | 1 | Free composite iliac flap | / | / | / | 2.6 | Chou and Malawer [10] | 2007 | 1 | Calcaneal prosthesis | No tumor recurrence | / | 67 | 12 | Muscolo et al. [4] Ottolenghi and Petracchi [3] | 2000 | 2 | Calcaneal autograft + iliac autograft | 1 osteonecrosis | / | / | 9–32 |
|
|
NC: number of cases; MSTS: Musculoskeletal Tumor Society; AOFAS: American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society; FU: follow-up; y: years.
|