Case Reports in Orthopedics

Case Reports in Orthopedics / 2016 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 7062129 |

Gan Zhi-Wei Jonathan, Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak, Mitra Amit Kanta, "Cartilage Delamination Flap Mimicking a Torn Medial Meniscus", Case Reports in Orthopedics, vol. 2016, Article ID 7062129, 5 pages, 2016.

Cartilage Delamination Flap Mimicking a Torn Medial Meniscus

Academic Editor: John Nyland
Received09 Sep 2016
Revised29 Oct 2016
Accepted17 Nov 2016
Published13 Dec 2016


We report a case of a chondral delamination lesion due to medial parapatellar plica friction syndrome involving the medial femoral condyle. This mimicked a torn medial meniscus in clinical and radiological presentation. Arthroscopy revealed a chondral delamination flap, which was debrided. Diagnosis of chondral lesions in the knee can be challenging. Clinical examination and MRI have good accuracy for diagnosis and should be used in tandem. Early diagnosis and treatment of chondral lesions are important to prevent progression to early osteoarthritis.

1. Introduction

We report a case of a chondral delamination lesion due to medial parapatellar plica friction syndrome involving the medial femoral condyle. This mimicked a torn medial meniscus in clinical and radiological presentation.

2. Case Report

A 39-year-old gentleman presented to us in clinic with a primary complaint of right knee pain for 3 years, on a background history of previous right medial meniscus tear 3 years priorly. The pain was localized to the posteromedial aspect of the knee and was worse when squatting, kneeling, or walking down the stairs. His regular sporting activities involved cycling, which did not cause significant discomfort. There was no history of specific injury or trauma to the knee and no effusion. He reported crepitus from the knee. He had no previous operations of the knee.

On examination, the posterior one-third of the medial joint line was tender. No synovial swelling or effusion was detected. There was a palpable click when performing the patella grinding test, suggestive of injury to the patella or a medial parapatellar plica. The range of motion of the knee was normal.

The patient reported having a previous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the right knee approximately 3 years and 9 months prior to the consult, which showed an intrasubstance medial meniscus tear. The pain had been constant since then.

A repeat MRI scan of the knee was performed (using a GE Healthcare Optima MR430s 1.5T machine). The following sequences were performed and reviewed: Proton Density (PD) sequences in coronal, sagittal, and axial cuts, Proton Density (PD) Fast Spin Echo (FSE) sequence in coronal cuts, and T2-weighted Fast Spin Echo (FSE) with fat suppression (FS) in sagittal cuts. The scan was reported as showing a horizontal tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus with superior articular surface contact, extending into the posterior root attachment (Figures 3 and 4). The anterior cruciate ligament was intact.

The patient underwent arthroscopy for treatment of the symptoms. During arthroscopy, a stiff medial parapatellar plica was noted, which was contacting and impinging on the medial femoral condyle (MFC) during knee flexion (Figures 5 and 6). Outerbridge grade 3 changes were noted of the cartilage in this area. A 2 × 2 cm cartilage flap was noted, attached anteriorly to the MFC (Figures 3 and 4). The flap was circular, approximately 2-3 mm thick, and attached along its anterior third to the anterior part of the medial femoral condyle (Figure 1). Its posterior two-thirds were free. There was no medial meniscus tear. Although not reported as showing a thickened medial parapatellar plica, review of the MRI showed a prominent medial parapatellar plica (Figure 2).

The lesion was debrided using a shaver until the remaining cartilage was stable with no loose edges. The cartilage underlying the flap showed Outerbridge grade 3 changes. The medial parapatellar plica was debrided, and no further impingement was noted during subsequent flexion/extension.

The patient’s symptoms greatly improved after the operation. He was discharged the day after the operation, attended outpatient physiotherapy, and was able to resume normal work and activities after 2 week. He was sent for physiotherapy. During review at 3 months postoperatively, he was noted to have residual anterior knee pain, with some pain when squatting. Subsequently, during review 7 months after operation, the knee pain had resolved, with minimal pain when squatting, and he noted that his knee felt normal and he had recovered his strength. Knee examination was unremarkable.

3. Discussion

3.1. Common Clinical Presentation of Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Injuries

Meniscal injuries may present with pain, locking, catching, giving way, or pain when kneeling or squatting. Clinically, an effusion may be present. The Thessaly test, Mcmurray’s test, and Apley’s test may be positive, and joint line tenderness may be present. However, these tests have limited diagnostic accuracy [13], and further investigations are often required, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies.

Articular cartilage injuries may present with pain, swelling, and locking. A history of injury, such as that of acute trauma, or twisting, may be present [4, 5]. Symptoms mimic a meniscal tear [6], and diagnosis may be challenging.

Parapatellar plica syndrome may present as anterior knee pain after prolonged sitting or when using the stairs. Retropatellar pain or medial knee pain may also be present. Other nonspecific symptoms such as intermittent clicking or locking or swelling may also occur [7]. A symptomatic medial parapatellar plica may be palpable on examination, especially if significantly thickened. During knee flexion between 30° and 60°, a snap or pop may be present. Palpation may also reveal retropatellar pain, clicking, or crepitations [8].

3.2. Structure of Cartilage

The structure of articular hyaline cartilage can be said to contain two large zones, a calcified and noncalcified zone. The noncalcified zone may be further subdivided into a superficial zone of thickness, in which collagen fibres are arranged parallel to the surface and offer good resistance to shear force, a transitional zone, in which collagen fibres run obliquely, and a deep zone, where collagen fibres are oriented perpendicularly to the surface and resist compression well. The calcified zone of cartilage contains cartilage fibres, anchored by hydroxyapatite crystals to the subchondral bone. The junction between the calcified and noncalcified zone is the tidemark [4, 9].

3.3. Clinical Presentation and Investigation of Injury

Partial-thickness separation or delamination injuries of articular cartilage similar to the one observed in our case (with the formation of a cartilage flap attached at one edge) have previously been described in the literature [5, 10, 11]. The delamination typically occurs at the tidemark, with the calcified zone of cartilage remaining attached to the subchondral bone.

The cartilage delamination in our patient was likely due to repeated injury and impingement from the stiff medial parapatellar plica; increasing Young’s modulus of the plica is associated with greater contact pressures on the underlying cartilage [12]. Synovial plicae may cause injuries to the underlying cartilage through a combination of compression, friction, and shear forces [13] and are associated with an increase in underlying articular cartilage lesions when present in a joint [7, 14, 15].

In our case, the history and physical examination suggested a meniscal tear. The previous MRI scan findings of a torn medial meniscus in the context of pain since the time of diagnosis pointed to a torn medial meniscus as the cause of pain. This appeared to be borne out by the current MRI, which showed what we expected to see: a tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus.

History and clinical examination are an important step in the diagnosis of knee injuries. On its own, clinical examination can diagnose meniscal lesions with significant accuracy. Mohan et al. reported diagnostic accuracy of 88% for medial meniscus injuries and 92% for lateral meniscus injuries when compared to arthroscopy [16].

Clinical examination for meniscal injury has diagnostic accuracy similar to that of MRI [1719] and when performed by an experienced surgeon may even surpass MRI [20]. Although other authors have noted less success (Sharma et al. found clinical accuracy of 73–78% compared to MRI accuracy of 92–95%, [21]); on the whole the accuracy of clinical examination remains high and should not be neglected in favour of MRI.

MRI is a good choice of imaging modality and has good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of meniscus tears. Sensitivities and specificities of over 80% have been described for detection of meniscal tears when compared with arthroscopy as a gold standard [2224].

In contrast, MRI sensitivity for detection of articular cartilage injury is significantly lower than that for meniscal injury. A meta-analysis by Zhang et al. in 2013 found that sensitivity for detection of chondral injury was 75% (62%–84%) and overall specificity was 94% (89%–97%).

MRI features of chondral delamination after acute injury were described by Kendell et al. [25], who reported that all 5 of their cases showed increased T2-weighted (fast spin-echo) signal in subchondral bone underlying the cartilage injury, indicating oedema. Other authors have also described similar findings [26, 27].

It can be difficult to determine the exact Outerbridge grade of the chondral lesion on MRI. In addition, MRI has higher sensitivity for more severe lesions (Outerbridge grades 3 and 4), with a progressive decrease in sensitivity with lower Outerbridge grades [28]. Low-grade early lesions of the articular cartilage are less likely to be detected.

In our case, atypically, there was minimal subchondral oedema underlying the chondral flap, possibly due to a long interval between injury and diagnosis and the mechanism of injury. The mechanism of injury was likely to have been nontraumatic in nature or as a result of repetitive microtrauma (i.e., friction and/or shear force resulting from medial plica syndrome) rather than a typical cause of chondral injury (such as acute trauma or twisting injury). These factors might have contributed to the unusual features of the lesion.

Location of the lesion in the posterior aspect of the knee may have been another contributing factor. Imaging at or around the posterior meniscal horn can be challenging. Sharifah et al. described significantly lower sensitivities when the meniscal tears were located in the posterior horn [22]. In the same vein, Naranje et al. reviewed the accuracy of MRI for diagnosis of meniscal lesions [23]. Four out of 6 of their false-positive meniscal tears were in the posterior horn, which the authors felt could have been related to complex anatomy in this area.

MRI is a useful tool for diagnosis of plicae in the knee. Nakanishi et al. found the sensitivity of MRI (when compared to arthroscopy) to be 93.1% and specificity to be 81.8% [29]. Plicae have low intensity on T1-weighted and T2-weighted MR sequences. Presence of a knee effusion may improve visualization of plicae on MR imaging sequences [30].

3.4. Areas for Improvement of Diagnostic Accuracy with Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Magnet Strength

Identification and characterization of lesions may improve with use of a 3T magnet instead of a 1.5T magnet. The MRI in our study used a 1.5T magnet. Van dyck and Kenis et al. showed that sensitivity of detection of all grades of cartilage lesions in the knee joint improved with use of a 3T magnet [31].

3.5. Areas for Improvement of Diagnostic Accuracy with Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Use of Specific Sequences

Use of specific MR imaging sequences may improve diagnosis of articular cartilage lesions. Gustas et al. [32] reported in 2015 that use of a 3D FSE sequence with use of both radial and conventional reformatted images had improved sensitivity and similar specificity to use of 2D FSE sequences alone. Similarly, Kijowski et al. reported improvements in sensitivity with a small reduction in specificity with addition of a T2 mapping sequence when a 3T magnet was used [33]. Kohl et al. reported good results for Outerbridge grade III and IV lesions with a 3T magnet and 3D-DESS cartilage specific sequences [28].

3.6. Importance of Early Recognition of Articular Cartilage Injury

Early diagnosis of injury to the articular cartilage is important, because undiagnosed lesions represent an opportunity for further cartilage injury and early osteoarthritis. In particular, lesions larger than 9 mm result in increased pressure on the rims of the defects and will likely result in further chondrocyte insult and progression of cartilage injury [34]. The size of the defect in our case was approximately 20 mm by 20 mm and as such would likely see progressive worsening.

4. Conclusion

Pain from intra-articular knee injury may result from injury to various structures in the knee, including articular cartilage and menisci. Clinical presentation of chondral injury and meniscal injury may present similarly, and in some cases, accurate diagnosis may be challenging.

We recommend a focused history and clinical examination for complaints of knee pain, followed by magnetic resonance imaging with a 3T magnet if available, with relevant specific MR imaging sequences. Atypical cases such as ours are rare, but we should remain on high alert for chondral injury, as timely diagnosis and expeditious treatment may prevent worsening of defects and progression to early osteoarthritis.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak and Mitra Amit Kanta are contributing authors


  1. M. Blyth, I. Anthony, B. Francq et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of the thessaly test, standardised clinical history and other clinical examination tests (Apley’s, mcmurray’s and joint line tenderness) for meniscal tears in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis,” Health Technology Assessment, vol. 19, no. 62, pp. 5–61, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S.-J. Kim, B.-Y. Hwang, D.-H. Choi, and Y. Mei, “The paradoxical McMurray test for the detection of meniscal tears: an arthroscopic study of mechanisms, types, and accuracy,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American, vol. 94, no. 16, pp. e1181–e1187, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. Moya, J. Javaloy, R. Montés-Micó, J. Beltrán, G. Muñoz, and R. Montalbán, “More than a decade of experience with implantable collamer lens,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 854–855, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. J. Sophia Fox, A. Bedi, and S. A. Rodeo, “The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function,” Sports Health, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 461–468, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. Johnson-Nurse and D. J. Dandy, “Fracture-separation of articular cartilage in the adult knee,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—British Volume, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 42–43, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. S. Gilley, M. I. Gelman, D. M. Edson, and R. W. Metcalf, “Chondral fractures of the knee. Arthrographic, arthroscopic, and clinical manifestations,” Radiology, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 51–54, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. Vaughan-Lane and D. J. Dandy, “The synovial shelf syndrome,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—British Volume, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 475–476, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. O. S. Schindler, “‘The Sneaky Plica’ revisited: morphology, pathophysiology and treatment of synovial plicae of the knee,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 247–262, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Mollenhauer and K. E. Kuettner, “Articular cartilage,” in Principles of Orthopaedic Practice, R. Dee, L. C. Hurst, M. A. Gruber, and S. A. Kottmeier, Eds., McGraw Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  10. A. S. Levy, J. Lohnes, S. Sculley, M. Lecroy, and W. Garrett, “Chondral delamination of the knee in soccer players,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 634–639, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. W. J. Hopkinson, W. A. Mitchell, and W. W. Curl, “Chondral fractures of the knee. Cause for confusion,” American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 309–312, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. S. Liu, Z. W. Zhuang, and S. R. Lyu, “Relationship between medial plica and medial femoral condyle—a three-dimensional dynamic finite element model,” Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 28, no. 9-10, pp. 1000–1005, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Ozcan, C. Copuroğlu, M. Ciftdemir, F. N. Turan, and O. U. Calpur, “Does an abnormal infrapatellar plica increase the risk of chondral damage in the knee,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 218–221, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. J. Christoforakis, J. Sanchez-Ballester, N. Hunt, R. Thomas, and R. K. Strachan, “Synovial shelves of the knee: association with chondral lesions,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1292–1298, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S.-R. Lyu and C.-C. Hsu, “Medial plicae and degeneration of the medial femoral condyle,” Arthroscopy, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. R. Mohan and H. S. Gosal, “Reliability of clinical diagnosis in meniscal tears,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 57–60, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. Sladjan, V. Zoran, and B. Zoran, “Correlation of clinical examination, ultrasound sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings with arthroscopic findings in relation to acute and chronic lateral meniscus injuries,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 71–76, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. Rayan, S. Bhonsle, and D. D. Shukla, “Clinical, MRI, and arthroscopic correlation in meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament injuries,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 129–132, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. M. Navali, M. Bazavar, M. A. Mohseni, B. Safari, and A. Tabrizi, “Arthroscopic evaluation of the accuracy of clinical examination versus MRI in diagnosing meniscus tears and cruciate ligament ruptures,” Archives of Iranian Medicine, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 229–232, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  20. E. Ercin, I. Kaya, I. Sungur, E. Demirbas, A. A. Ugras, and E. M. Cetinus, “History, clinical findings, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic correlation in meniscal lesions,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 851–856, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. U. K. Sharma, B. K. Shrestha, S. Rijal et al., “Clinical, MRI and arthroscopic correlation in internal derangement of knee,” Kathmandu University Medical Journal, vol. 9, no. 35, pp. 174–178, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  22. M. I. A. Sharifah, C. L. Lee, A. Suraya, A. Johan, A. F. S. K. Syed, and S. P. Tan, “Accuracy of MRI in the diagnosis of meniscal tears in patients with chronic ACL tears,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 826–830, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Naranje, R. Mittal, H. Nag, and R. Sharma, “Arthroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of meniscus lesions in the chronic anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee,” Arthroscopy, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1045–1051, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. K. Gupta, M. K. Rauniyar, N. K. Karn, P. L. Sah, K. Dhungel, and K. Ahmad, “MRI evaluation of knee injury with arthroscopic correlation,” Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, vol. 12, no. 26, pp. 63–67, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. D. Kendell, C. A. Helms, J. W. Rampton, W. E. Garrett, and L. D. Higgins, “MRI appearance of chondral delamination injuries of the knee,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 184, no. 5, pp. 1486–1489, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. A. Rubin, “Magnetic resonance imaging of chondral and osteochondral injuries,” Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 348–359, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  27. D. A. Rubin, C. D. Harner, and J. M. Costello, “Treatable chondral injuries in the knee: frequency of associated focal subchondral edema,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 174, no. 4, pp. 1099–1106, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Kohl, S. Meier, S. S. Ahmad et al., “Accuracy of cartilage-specific 3-Tesla 3D-DESS magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of chondral lesions: comparison with knee arthroscopy,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, vol. 10, no. 1, article 191, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. Nakanishi, M. Inoue, T. Ishida et al., “MR evaluation of mediopatellar plica,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 567–571, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. García-Valtuille, F. Abascal, L. Cerezal et al., “Anatomy and MR imaging appearances of synovial plicae of the knee,” Radiographics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 775–784, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. P. Van Dyck, C. Kenis, F. M. Vanhoenacker et al., “Comparison of 1.5- and 3-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1376–1384, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. C. N. Gustas, D. G. Blankenbaker, A. M. Del Rio, C. S. Winalski, and R. Kijowski, “Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint using an isotropic resolution 3D fast spin-echo sequence with conventional and radial reformatted images,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 205, no. 2, pp. 371–379, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. R. Kijowski, D. G. Blankenbaker, A. Munoz del Rio, G. S. Baer, and B. K. Graf, “Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint: value of adding a T2 mapping sequence to a routine mr imaging protocol,” Radiology, vol. 267, no. 2, pp. 503–513, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. Papaioannou, C. K. Demetropoulos, and Y. H. King, “Predicting the effects of knee focal articular surface injury with a patient-specific finite element model,” The Knee, vol. 17, pp. 61–68, 2010. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Gan Zhi-Wei Jonathan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.