Case Reports in Orthopedics

Case Reports in Orthopedics / 2018 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 4986061 | 6 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4986061

Epiphysiolysis Type Salter I of the Medial Clavicle with Posterior Displacement: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Academic Editor: Johannes Mayr
Received07 May 2018
Accepted29 Aug 2018
Published27 Sep 2018

Abstract

Physeal fractures of the medial clavicle with posterior displacement of the metaphysis are very rare injuries, but additional injuries can be life-threatening. Due to the specific clavicular ossification process, skeletally immature patients present usually not true sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) dislocations accordingly to adults but rather displaced physeal fractures. There is no consensus in the current literature on the best treatment of this lesion. Conservative treatment is not resulting in good outcome; closed reduction is often not successful, and open reduction with internal fixation is finally required. Several methods are described for stabilizing these physeal fractures. We treated three osseous immature patients with this lesion. Due to the small dimension of the medial clavicular epiphysis, we performed in one case a transosseous figure-of-eight suture of the clavicular metaphysis towards the sternum, and in the two other cases, a transosseous suture from the clavicular metaphysis on the anterior clavicular periosteum. The latter technique avoids harm to the small epiphysis or the SCJ and minimizes the risk of retrosternal complications.

1. Introduction

Lesions of the sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) including epiphysiolyses type Salter I and II are rare in all age groups, representing less than 5% of all shoulder girdle injuries [1]. Posterior dislocations of the medial end of the clavicle in skeletally immature patients are exceptional. But, potential life-threating complications can occur due to the proximity to the trachea, esophagus, and retrosternal vascular and neural structures. In the literature, severe complications are reported resulting from missed diagnoses like cerebral insult due to vascular lesion [2] and compression of the trachea [3], the subclavian vessels [4], and the brachial plexus [5]; also, fatalities are documented due to a tracheoesophageal fistula [6].

An accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment are therefore important for a good outcome [7]. Only few case reports or small case series exist in the current literature. These injuries are described as dislocation of the SCJ or epiphysiolysis of the medial end of the clavicle. The mechanism of injury is either a direct force applied to the medial clavicle or an indirect force due to an impact on the posterolateral aspect of the shoulder occurring often during contact sport activities [8].

The SCJ is functionally a saddle joint with a small surface providing only a poor congruence and containment. Therefore, a thick capsule and a strong ligamentous system guarantee joint stability. Spencer et al. showed on a cadaver model that the posterior capsule is the most important restraint for anterior and posterior translation in the SCJ [9]. Anterior dislocations occur nearly three times more often than posterior dislocations [10].

The understanding of the process of clavicular ossification is essential for an appropriate management of injuries around the SCJ in skeletally immature patients. The center of ossification of the medial end of the clavicle appears at the age of 18 to 20 years, and its growth plate fuses at the age of 20 to 25 years [11, 12].

Therefore, the physis of the medial clavicle is the weakest link in the SCJ and it is more likely to sustain a physeal separation than a true SCJ dislocation (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). The strong ligamentous structures of the SCJ retain the cartilaginous epiphysis in place, and the metaphysis of the clavicle displaces posteriorly towards the retrosternal space. On standard radiographs, the diagnosis of a SCJ lesion can be missed easily. Therefore, the clinical assessment of local pain and swelling and SCJ instability are important. To confirm the diagnosis and evaluate additional retrosternal injuries, further analysis using a CT scan is mandatory. However, even with a CT scan, discrimination between true SCJ dislocation and displaced epiphysiolysis type Salter I or II can be difficult [1317]. Often, the final diagnosis is made during surgery [18].

In the current orthopedic literature, there are just a few case reports or small case series reported of the rare entity of epiphysiolysis of the medial clavicle.

Our objective is to propose an appropriate management of epiphysiolysis of the medial end of the clavicle in the skeletally immature patient.

2. Cases

We report on three patients suffering from traumatic epiphysiolysis of the medial clavicle and discuss the surgical management and fixation techniques.

In the first two cases—a 13-year-old boy and an 8-year-old girl, the mechanism of injury consisted in a lateral impact onto the involved shoulder while falling during a soccer play. In the third case of a 16-year-old boy, the mechanism was a direct blow in the anteroposterior direction on the upper thorax while practicing Judo. All three patients suffered from an instant pain in the right SCJ area. Clinically, no neurovascular lesions or dyspnea were present. Standard radiographs revealed an asymmetric position of the medial clavicle with posterior displacement of the medial end on the injured side (Figure 2). CT scan confirmed the diagnosis of epiphysiolysis of the medial clavicular epiphysis (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). But, due to the absence of the corresponding centers of ossification of the medial clavicular epiphysis, discrimination from a pure posterior dislocation of the SCJ was difficult preoperatively, and final diagnosis was only possible during open surgery.

In the first child, an unsuccessful closed reduction was attempted prior to operation. The operation was performed under general anesthesia with the patient in supine position. A cushion was placed between the scapulae to exert tension on the anterior upper thorax. A 4 cm long skin incision was made in line with the clavicle from its medial end to the sternum. The periosteum, which was found intact anteriorly, was incised over the medial clavicle. The thick periosteal sleeve was disrupted posteriorly allowing posterior displacement of the medial clavicular metaphysis which was locked posterior to the manubrium. The medial clavicular epiphysis remained in place; thus, the lesion was classified as an epiphysiolysis type Salter I.

Reduction of the clavicle back in its periosteal sleeve was performed by gentle traction and the use of a pointed reduction clamp. Stabilization of the medial clavicular metaphysis was performed with a transosseous suture using a FiberTape® in a figure-of-eight fashion from the clavicular metaphysis to the anterior cortex of the sternum.

Due to the experience of the first case in which the clavicular metaphysis was trapped behind the periosteal sleeve, surgical technique was adapted for the second and third children.

The skin incision was shorter, about 2 cm centered on the medial end of the clavicle. The platysma was just fenestrated. In both cases, the periosteal sleeve of the medial clavicle was found to be completely intact in its anterior part. It was incised longitudinally leaving intact the capsule of the SCJ. As seen in the first patient, the medial clavicular epiphysis stayed properly in place and the clavicular metaphysis was displaced retrosternally disrupting the posterior periosteum longitudinally. Open reduction was performed. Three drill holes were made in the superior and inferior cortex of the medial clavicular metaphysis avoiding perforation of the posterior cortex. Three FiberWire® were inserted in the holes, and the metaphysis was anchored directly to the strong and solid anterior clavicular periosteum (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). Closure was completed in layers by additional adaptation of the anterior periosteum and the platysma.

Intraoperatively, in all three children, a good stability was achieved with the proposed suture techniques. No complications occurred during the operation. Facing the rare risk of severe vascular or pulmonal problems especially during the reduction maneuver, we assured backup by a thoracic surgeon in all cases.

Postoperatively, the patients were wearing a posterior figure-of-eight bandage for six weeks and free mobilization of the shoulder was allowed below the horizontal plane. At twelve weeks, all three patients were asymptomatic. The range of shoulder motion was symmetric; the body-cross test negative, and clinically the medial clavicle was stable. Radiographs revealed healing of the epiphysiolysis in correct length of the clavicle and correct position of the medial clavicular metaphysis. Also, at one-year follow-up, the patients remained asymptomatic and without any functional impairment, and all had returned to former sport activities.

3. Discussion

Actually, there is no consensus in the literature concerning the optimal treatment of this physeal fracture. Conservative treatment without anatomical reduction by thinking that the remodeling potential of immature bone would be able to restore correct anatomical position of the medial end of the clavicle is described in the past, but with reported complications like thoracic outlet syndrome by callus formation [19] and pneumothorax [20].

Denham and Dingley published probably one of the first reports of epiphyseal separation of the medial end of the clavicle. He favored an anatomical reduction to improve healing and decrease the number of poor results [21]. Closed reduction was recommended by several authors if there are no additional retrosternal injuries [16, 2124]. However, the reported success rate was very diverging (Table 1). Often, an open reduction and internal fixation were required after a failed attempt of closed reduction or in case of residual instability [14, 23, 2527]. Waters et al. [23] reviewed 13 medial clavicle injuries in skeletally immature patients and found 11 physeal fractures. They reported on instability after closed reduction in all cases and recommend immediate open reduction and fixation [23]. Laffosse et al. [14] reported a series of 13 patients with systematic failure of the attempted closed reduction. They also recommend open reduction with a stabilization procedure [14].


Author, yearAgeClosed reductionDefinitive treatment

Goldfarb et al., 2001 [25]67–166 failed6 ORIF osteosuture
Waters et al., 2003 [23]1113–173 failed11 ORIF osteosuture
Gobet et al., 2004 [16]38–151 failed1 ORIF osteosuture
2 successful2 nonoperative
Hofwegen and Wolf, 2008 [26]217–201 failed2 ORIF osteosuture
Laffosse et al., 2010 [14]1315–205 failed13 ORIF different techniques
Tennent et al., 2012 [27]714–197 failed7 ORIF osteosuture
Garg et al., 2012 [13]1121 failed1 ORIF osteosuture over SCJ
Gil-Albarova et al., 2012 [34]1111 successful1 nonoperative
Koch and Wells, 2012 [29]11401 ORIF osteosuture
Lee et al., 2014 [35]2013–192 failed18 ORIF osteosuture
2 successful2 nonoperative
Ozer et al., 2014 [36]1161 successful1 nonoperative
Tepolt et al., 2014 [18]67–172 failed6 osteosuture over SCJ
Perdreau et al., 2014 [37]1161 failed1 osteosuture over SCJ
Krantzow, 2015 [38]11701 osteosuture
Kassé et al., 2016 [39]316–1903 osteosuture or cerclage SCJ

The methods described for stabilizing these physeal fractures are quite different including fixation by Kirschner wires [21], anterior plating [17, 28], or various suture techniques such as costoclavicular cerclage or tenodesis [14], repair of the costoclavicular and sternoclavicular ligaments [13, 23], transosseous fixation in a figure-of-eight manner of the clavicular metaphysis to the intact epiphysis [25, 29], or suturing the clavicle to the manubrium [18, 26, 30, 31]. The use of transarticular Kirschner wires has been abandoned due to the risk of intrathoracic wire migration [32].

Tennent et al. described a new stabilization technique [27]. After open reduction, they sutured the medial clavicle to the anterior periosteum and platysma as a single layer using absorbable sutures, which were passed through drill holes in the medial clavicle. At an average of nine months, their patients presented good functional results. Only one patient had to be reoperated six months after the initial procedure to remove a prominent suture knot and to revise the scar.

We are convinced that it is important to distinguish between a real dislocation of the SCJ and a physeal fracture of the medial end of the clavicle. Osseous immature patients suffer rather from physeal fracture type Salter I or II then from a pure dislocation of the SCJ. Nevertheless, these two entities are not every time properly discriminated in the literature, and in case of successful closed reduction and nonoperative treatment, the exact diagnosis will remain uncertain. We should keep in mind that in epiphysiolysis of the medial clavicle, the strong periosteal sleeve plays an important role. Corresponding to lateral physeal fracture, the clavicle peels off from its physis and periosteal sleeve, which is just disrupted longitudinally [33].

In all our three cases, the medial epiphysis remained anatomically in place, and the clavicular metaphysis was displaced posteriorly to it into the retrosternal space. In all three cases, the periosteal sleeve was only disrupted posteriorly allowing the posterior penetration of the medial clavicular end.

Due to its small dimension, the medial clavicular epiphysis itself does not offer sufficient grip for anchoring sutures. Thus, two different options to restore stability of the medial clavicle are available. The first one consists in a transosseous figure-of-eight suture of the clavicular metaphysis towards the anterior cortex of the sternum. The second one is comparable to the technique described by Tennent et al. [27]. The anteriorly intact periosteal sleeve is incised, the clavicular metaphysis reduced back into its sleeve, and held in place by means of three transosseous sutures from the clavicular metaphysis on the anterior clavicular periosteum. In contrast to the technique described by Tennent et al., we did not include the platysma in the suture allowing a better coverage of the knots by the platysma. In addition, instead of PDS, we used FiberWire®, thus creating less prominent knots.

We attempted a closed reduction in the first patient which failed because the metaphysis was stucked outside the periosteal sleeve posterior to the epiphysis as seen later intraoperatively. This finding agrees with the literature review shown in Table 1, which suggests that a closed reduction is rarely successful. Even if the patients do not present further initial symptoms, in our opinion, an immediate (up to 6 h) open reduction and fixation are indicated to avoid injuries of retrosternal structures by either the instable fragment or callus formation.

In contrast, when physeal fracture of the medial clavicle with anterior displacement occurs, a conservative treatment is often recommended. In this case, the periosteal sleeve is just disrupted anteriorly and stays intact posteriorly, which protects the mediastinal structures.

The advantage of the described methods is that neither the fragile epiphysis nor the SCJ is violated, the retrosternal structures are safe, and there is no hardware irritation. Mechanically, the clavicular metaphysis buttresses against the clavicular epiphysis, and the transosseous sutures into the anterior periosteum prevent the posterior redislocation. The bone is also loaded in compression, and the restored anterior periosteum plays the role of a tension band.

We practiced both stabilization techniques. Both had excellent clinical and radiographical results at one year. Nevertheless, we recommend the second one stabilizing the clavicula on the anterior periosteum, because it is technically simpler and safer referring to possible iatrogenic retrosternal injuries.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. E. F. Cave, Fractures and Other Injuries, Year Book Publishers, 1958.
  2. M. S. Marcus and V. Tan, “Cerebrovascular accident in a 19-year-old patient: a case report of posterior sternoclavicular dislocation,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. e1–e4, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. Nakayama, T. Tanaka, T. Noguchi, J. Yasuda, and Y. Terada, “Tracheal stenosis caused by retrosternal dislocation of the right clavicle,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 685–687, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. W. Emms, A. D. Morris, J. C. Kaye, and S. D. Blair, “Subclavian vein obstruction caused by an unreduced type II Salter Harris injury of the medial clavicular physis,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 271–273, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Jain, D. Monbaliu, and J. F. Thompson, “Thoracic outlet syndrome caused by chronic retrosternal dislocation of the clavicle. Successful treatment by transaxillary resection of the first rib,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume (London), vol. 84, pp. 16–118, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  6. M. J. Wasylenko and E. F. Busse, “Posterior dislocation of the clavicle causing fatal tracheoesophageal fistula,” Canadian Journal of Surgery, vol. 24, pp. 626-627, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  7. K. D. Carmichael, A. Longo, S. Lick, and L. Swischuk, “Posterior sternoclavicular epiphyseal fracture-dislocation with delayed diagnosis,” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 608–612, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. T. Buckerfield and M. E. Castle, “Acute traumatic retrosternal dislocation of the clavicle,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 379–385, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. E. E. Spencer, J. E. Kuhn, L. J. Huston, J. E. Carpenter, and R. E. Hughes, “Ligamentous restraints to anterior and posterior translation of the sternoclavicular joint,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. S. Bahk, J. E. Kuhn, L. M. Galatz, P. M. Connor, and G. R. Wiliams Jr., “Acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular injuries and clavicular, glenoid, and scapular fractures,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 91-A, pp. 2492–2510, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  11. C. F. Heinig, “Retrosternal dislocation of the clavicle: early recognition, X-ray diagnosis, and management,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 50-A, p. 830, 1968. View at: Google Scholar
  12. J. Y. Bishop and E. L. Flatow, “Pediatric shoulder trauma,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 432, no. 432, pp. 41–48, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Garg, Z. A. Alshameeri, and W. A. Wallace, “Posterior sternoclavicular joint dislocation in a child: a case report with review of literature,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. e11–e16, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. M. Laffosse, A. Espie, N. Bonnevialle et al., “Posterior dislocation of the sternoclavicular joint and epiphyseal disruption of the medial clavicle with posterior displacement in sports participants,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 92-B, no. 1, pp. 103–109, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. H. Selesnick, M. Jablon, C. Frank, and M. Post, “Retrosternal dislocation of the clavicle. Report of four cases,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 287–291, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. Gobet, M. Meuli, S. Altermatt, V. Jenni, and U. V. Willi, “Medial clavicular epiphysiolysis in children: the so-called sterno-clavicular dislocation,” Emergency Radiology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 252–255, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. W. M. Franck, R. M. Siassi, and F. F. Hennig, “Treatment of posterior epiphyseal disruption of the medial clavicle with a modified balser plate,” The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 966–968, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. Tepolt, P. M. Carry, P. C. Heyn, and N. H. Miller, “Posterior sternoclavicular joint injuries in the adolescent population: a meta-analysis,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2517–2524, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. M. Gangahar and T. Flogaites, “Retrosternal dislocation of the clavicle producing thoracic outlet syndrome,” The Journal of Trauma, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 369–372, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. L. W. Worman and C. Leagus, “Intrathoracic injury following retrosternal dislocation of the clavicle,” The Journal of Trauma, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 416–423, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. H. Denham and A. F. Dingley, “Epiphyseal separation of the medial end of the clavicle,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1179–1183, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Yang, H. al-Etani, and M. Letts, “Diagnosis and treatment of posterior sternoclavicular joint dislocations in children,” The American Journal of Orthopedics, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 565–569, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  23. P. M. Waters, D. S. Bae, and R. K. Kadiyala, “Short-term outcomes after surgical treatment of traumatic posterior sternoclavicular fracture-dislocations in children and adolescents,” Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 464–469, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. R. Zaslav, S. Ray, and C. S. Neer 2nd, “Conservative management of a displaced medial clavicular physeal injury in an adolescent athlete. A case report and literature review,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 833–836, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. A. Goldfarb, G. S. Bassett, S. Sullivan, and J. E. Gordon, “Retrosternal displacement after physeal fracture of the medial clavicle in children treatment by open reduction and internal fixation,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 83-B, no. 8, pp. 1168–1172, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. V. Hofwegen and B. Wolf, “Suture repair of posterior sternoclavicular physeal fractures: a report of two cases,” The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal, vol. 28, pp. 49–52, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  27. T. D. Tennent, E. O. Pearse, and D. M. Eastwood, “A new technique for stabilizing adolescent posteriorly displaced physeal medial clavicular fractures,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1734–1739, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Asfazadourian and J. F. Kouvalchouk, “Retrosternal luxation of the clavicle. Apropos of 4 cases surgically treated using a temporary screwed anterior plate and review of the literature,” Annales de Chirurgie de la Main, vol. 16, pp. 152–169, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  29. M. J. Koch and L. Wells, “Proximal clavicle physeal fracture with posterior displacement: diagnosis, treatment and prevention,” Orthopedics, vol. 35, pp. e108–e111, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. E. Aydin, T. C. Dülgeroglu, A. Ates, and H. Metineren, “Repair of unstable posterior sternoclavicular dislocation using nonabsorbable tape suture and tension band technique: a case report with good results,” Case Reports in Orthopedics, vol. 2015, Article ID 750898, 3 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. P. Thomas, P. R. Williams, and H. C. Hoddinott, ““A safe” surgical technique for stabilization of the sternoclavicular joint: a cadaveric and clinic study,” Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons, vol. 82, pp. 432–435, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  32. N. Venissac, M. Alifano, M. Dahan, and J. Mouroux, “Intrathoracic migration of Kirschner pins,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1953–1955, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. A. Ogden, “Distal clavicular physeal injury,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 188, no. 188, pp. 68–73, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. Gil-Albarova, S. Rebollo-González, V. E. Gómez-Palacio, and A. Herrera, “Management of sternoclavicular dislocation in young children: considerations about diagnosis and treatment of four cases,” Musculoskeletal Surgery, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 137–143, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. T. Lee, A. Y. Nasreddine, E. M. Black, D. S. Bae, and M. S. Kocher, “Posterior sternoclavicular joint injuries in skeletally immature patients,” Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 369–375, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. U. E. Ozer, M. B. Yalçin, K. Kanberoglu, and A. E. Bagatur, “Retrosternal displacement of the clavicle after medial physeal fracture in an adolescent: MRI,” Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics B, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 375–378, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Perdreau, B. Bingen, L. Gossing, E. Lejeune, and A. Beugnies, “Posterior sternoclavicular epiphyseal fracture-dislocation: case report and review of literature,” Injury Extra, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Krantzow, “Medial clavicle physeal fracture: a case report from diagnosis to treatment,” The Orthopod, vol. 14, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  39. A. N. Kassé, S. O. Limam, S. Diao, J. C. Sané, B. Thiam, and M. H. Sy, “Fracture-separation of the medial clavicular epiphysis: about 6 cases and review of the literature,” The Pan African Medical Journal, vol. 25, p. 19, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 C. Siebenmann et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

599 Views | 342 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.