Case Reports in Orthopedics

Case Reports in Orthopedics / 2019 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 7571486 |

Chris Hoedt, Gabriel S. Makar, Christina J. Gutowski, Thomas Holdbrook, Tae Won B. Kim, David A. Fuller, "Recurrent Adolescent Giant-Cell Tumor of the Scaphoid: Scaphoid Excision with Intracarpal Fusion after Failed Curettage and Bone Grafting", Case Reports in Orthopedics, vol. 2019, Article ID 7571486, 5 pages, 2019.

Recurrent Adolescent Giant-Cell Tumor of the Scaphoid: Scaphoid Excision with Intracarpal Fusion after Failed Curettage and Bone Grafting

Academic Editor: Akio Sakamoto
Received25 Oct 2018
Revised23 Jan 2019
Accepted28 Mar 2019
Published09 Apr 2019


We present a case of the giant-cell tumor of bone in the scaphoid of a 17-year-old female. Imaging revealed an expansile lytic lesion of her scaphoid, and the diagnosis was confirmed with open biopsy. She was treated with curettage and iliac crest bone graft, in an effort to spare reconstruction of her wrist. After one year, she developed increasing tightness and pain. Local recurrence was apparent on radiographs, and CT revealed increased lucency with bony destruction in the area of prior excision. She was successfully treated, without recurrence to date, with complete scaphoid excision and a four-corner wrist fusion. Local recurrence of the giant-cell tumor of bone is high, especially in carpal bones. When treating patients with advanced lesions, more aggressive initial options should be considered.

1. Introduction

Hand tumors are relatively uncommon with 15% of soft tissue tumors and 6% of bone sarcomas occurring in the wrist and hand [14]. Tumors of the carpal bones are rare with a prevalence of 0.16% [5]. The giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) comprises approximately 2-5% of hand tumors with most occurring in the metacarpals and phalanges [68]. GCTB is a benign but locally aggressive osteolytic tumor characterized by the presence of multinucleated, osteoclastic giant cells. It accounts for approximately 5% of all primary bone tumors and occurs most often in the epiphyses of long bones in the third or fourth decade of life [9]. The Campanacci classification grades these tumors based on radiographic characteristics. Local recurrence rates are variable in the literature, ranging from 8 to 45%, depending on the extent of tumor removal, use of chemical/topical adjuvants, and other host factors [1012]. Benign metastases develop in approximately 2% of patients [9]. Treatment is commonly extended intralesional curettage with adjuvant treatment. However, en bloc resection of these tumors has been shown to be associated with reduced recurrence rates and may be indicated for carpal lesions that are grade 2 or 3 lesions or recurrent tumors.

Risk factors for local recurrence include patient age at diagnosis, Campanacci grade, use and type of adjuvant therapy, use of medical therapy, primary versus recurrent tumor, anatomic location, and packing technique [1012]. Tight and complicated anatomy of the hand and foot may complicate adequate extended curettage and adjuvant treatment. Rajani et al. reviewed 18 patients with giant-cell tumors of the foot and ankle bones: of 17 tumors treated with intralesional procedures, 10 developed recurrence [13]. Local recurrence in the hand is even more prevalent, with reported rates of up to 90% following curettage and bone grafting [8, 14]. Only 2% of all GCTs have been reported in the hand, with 10% of these arising in the carpal bones [8, 14]. To date, only six GCTs of the scaphoid have been reported in the literature, with no known cases under the age of 18 [15].

The patient we report was informed that data concerning her case would be submitted for publication, and she provided consent.

2. Case Report

A 17-year-old right-hand dominant female presented with atraumatic, progressive, activity-related right wrist pain for five months. Clinical examination showed tenderness over the scaphoid with a limited range of motion and decreased strength compared to her left wrist. Wrist radiographs revealed a lytic lesion of the scaphoid with a nondisplaced pathologic fracture (Figure 1), and MRI demonstrated a marrow-replacing expansile lesion with extraosseous extension and multiple fluid-fluid levels (Figures 2(a)2(c)).

An open biopsy from the volar approach and intraoperative frozen section revealed the giant-cell tumor of bone. A volar approach for the biopsy was selected to allow complete access to the scaphoid since the lesion was Campanacci grade 3 and a dorsal approach may have limited the operative area. The lesion was curetted, electrocautery was applied to the surfaces of the defect, and it was packed with iliac crest bone autograft including a corticocancellous strut; pathology confirmed the diagnosis (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). The patient tolerated the procedure well. She wore a long-arm thumb spica cast for 12 weeks and used a bone stimulator from week 6 to 12. At her 4-month follow-up, she was transitioned to a splint and began occupational therapy, and her X-rays showed early consolidation of the graft without displacement or obvious local recurrence (Figure 4). At her 4-month exam, she had 25 degrees of wrist flexion and 25 degrees of extension. She had full motion and function of all of her fingers and could oppose all fingers to her thumb without difficulty.

At her 1-year follow-up visit, she complained of increased tightness and intermittent pain in her wrist. She had lost the ability to comfortably flex her wrist, but otherwise, her exam was unchanged. Her wrist X-rays showed an interval lucency within the scaphoid, and CT scan demonstrated cystic appearance within the scaphoid and demineralized cortical rim, concerning for tumor recurrence (Figures 5(a)5(c)).

Fifteen months after her initial procedure, she underwent complete excision of her scaphoid and a four-corner wrist fusion. Intraoperative pathology assessment confirmed recurrence of the giant-cell tumor of bone. She was placed in a thumb spica splint for 6 weeks, then transitioned to a removable splint. At 12 weeks postoperative, she began occupational therapy. At her one-year follow-up from her excision and fusion, she was back to work and pain-free. She could extend her wrist 20 degrees and flex 15 degrees. She had 70 degrees of pronation and supination. She could radially deviate her wrist 5 degrees and ulnarly deviate her wrist 10 degrees. At her one-year follow-up, her grip strength was 5/5. Her follow-up X-rays taken at that visit showed a well-healed fusion of the lunate to the capitate to the hamate to the triquetrum (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)).

3. Discussion

Primary bone tumors of the hand and wrist are rare. Soft tissue tumors are more common than bone tumors with benign lesions being more common in both instances [16, 17]. Bone tumors of the hand and wrist comprise approximately 4-7% of all bone tumors, most of which (86%) are benign [18, 19]. Metastases to the hand comprise only slightly more than 0.1% of total bone metastases [20]. Overall, tumors of the hand and wrist are highly uncommon with primary bone tumors being especially rare.

We present the first adolescent case of the giant-cell tumor of bone arising in the scaphoid of a 17-year-old female. GCTB typically occurs in the epiphysis of long bones, such as the distal femur, proximal tibia, and distal radius, with a higher incidence in patients 20-50 years of age. Most GCTBs of the hand are found in tubular bones, the metacarpals, and phalanges; Averill et al. reviewed 1,228 GCTs, of which 31 were found in the hand with only a single one located in the scaphoid [8]. The six previously reported cases of GCTB in the scaphoid were in adult patients older than ours: 18-year-old male, 19-year-old female, 26-year-old male, 29-year-old female, 30-year-old female, and 48-year-old female [14, 15, 2124].

Usually, the giant-cell tumor of bone located in the hand is treated with intralesional curettage and burr and with bone grafting or bone cement; alternatively, it may be treated by wide excision with reconstruction. Amputation is considered in refractory cases or if the tumor involves an expendable bone. Studies have compared the rate of local recurrence associated with these procedures. In a retrospective review of 327 cases of GCTB in any bone, Campanacci et al. found local recurrence rates of 27% in patients treated with intralesional excision, 8% after marginal excision, and 0% after wide or radical resection [25]. Saikia et al. retrospectively reviewed the literature and showed a local recurrence rate of 75% (48/64) in the hand when patients were treated with intralesional procedures, compared to 24% (9/38) when treated with resection or ray amputation [26]. Similar findings were reported by Averill et al., who showed an 87% (13/15) recurrence rate of GCTB in the hand after curettage [8].

Management of patients with GCTB may also consist of denosumab and bisphosphonates. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B [NF-κB] ligand), prevents the development of osteoclasts thereby reducing bone resorption. Additionally, denosumab eliminates GCTB characteristic giant cells while concurrently building new bone [27, 28]. Through two phase-2 trials, denosumab has been predominantly recommended for patients with unresectable GCTB or when surgery might result in severe morbidity [29, 30]. Bisphosphonates have also been found to reduce the destruction caused by GCTB through inducing apoptosis [31]. Preoperative treatment with bisphosphonates has not shown the ability to eradicate the tumor but has shown a decrease in recurrence in stage III diseases [12, 32]. Although medical management seems to more dramatically decrease the osteoclastic nature of GCTB in advanced disease, further studies are needed to demonstrate the role and complications of bisphosphonates and denosumab in the long-term treatment of patients with less aggressive disease.

In patients presenting with a Campanacci grade 3 giant-cell tumor in a carpal bone, we believe that surgeons should consider a more aggressive primary treatment like excision. Although curettage with adjuvant therapy has demonstrated improved wrist function in other studies compared to excision and reconstruction, the recurrence rate is significantly higher which warrants a more definitive treatment. For GCTB of the scaphoid, more definitive treatment would be en bloc excision with a reconstruction, like four-corner fusion or proximal row carpectomy. Patients presenting with Campanacci grade 2 carpal lesions deserve an intraoperative assessment of bone quality and carpal mechanics after curettage has been performed to determine if the risk of recurrence outweighs the improved functional outcome that grafting, or cement, would yield. When treating a patient with a Campanacci grade 1 lesion, curettage with adjuvant treatment is strongly recommended to preserve wrist mechanics since recurrence rates are lower.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. M. J. Kransdorf and J. M. Meis, “From the archives of the AFIP. Extraskeletal osseous and cartilaginous tumors of the extremities,” RadioGraphics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 853–884, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Garcia and S. Bianchi, “Diagnostic imaging of tumors of the hand and wrist,” European Radiology, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1470–1482, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. S. Hsu, V. R. Hentz, and J. Yao, “Tumours of the hand,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 157–166, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. F. Mavrogenis, G. N. Panagopoulos, A. Angelini et al., “Tumors of the hand,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 747–762, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. M. Murray, R. A. Berger, and C. Y. Inwards, “Primary neoplasms of the carpal bones,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1008–1013, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. K. Shigematsu, Y. Kobata, H. Yajima, K. Kawamura, N. Maegawa, and Y. Takakura, “Giant-cell tumors of the carpus,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1214–1219, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Angelini, A. F. Mavrogenis, and P. Ruggieri, “Giant cell tumor of the capitate,” Musculoskeletal Surgery, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 45–48, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. M. Averill, R. J. Smith, and C. J. Campbell, “Giant-cell tumors of the bones of the hand,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. A. Raskin, J. H. Schwab, H. J. Mankin, D. S. Springfield, and F. J. Hornicek, “Giant cell tumor of bone,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 118–126, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. W. Wysocki, E. Soni, W. W. Virkus, M. T. Scarborough, S. E. Leurgans, and S. Gitelis, “Is intralesional treatment of giant cell tumor of the distal radius comparable to resection with respect to local control and functional outcome?” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, vol. 473, no. 2, pp. 706–715, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. F. M. Klenke, D. E. Wenger, C. Y. Inwards, P. S. Rose, and F. H. Sim, “Giant cell tumor of bone: risk factors for recurrence,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, vol. 469, no. 2, pp. 591–599, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. F. Tse, K. C. Wong, S. M. Kumta, L. Huang, T. C. Chow, and J. F. Griffith, “Bisphosphonates reduce local recurrence in extremity giant cell tumor of bone: a case-control study,” Bone, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 68–73, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. Rajani, L. Schaefer, M. T. Scarborough, and C. P. Gibbs, “Giant cell tumors of the foot and ankle bones: high recurrence rates after surgical treatment,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1141–1145, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. E. A. Athanasian, L. E. Wold, and P. C. Amadio, “Giant cell tumors of the bones of the hand,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Kew, S. M. Kumta, and P. C. Leung, “Giant cell tumour in the scaphoid bone: Case reports,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 717-718, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Capelastegui, E. Astigarraga, G. Fernandez-Canton, I. Saralegui, J. A. Larena, and A. Merino, “Masses and pseudomasses of the hand and wrist: MR findings in 134 cases,” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 498–507, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. W. Khaled and J.-L. Drapé, “MRI of wrist and hand masses,” Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 1238–1246, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. A. Campbell, P. A. Millner, and C. R. Dreghorn, “Primary bone tumours of the hand and wrist,” Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 5–7, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. E. Besser, A. Roessner, E. Brug, R. Erlemann, C. Timm, and E. Grundmann, “Bone tumors of the hand: A review of 300 cases documented in the Westphalian bone tumor register,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Traumatic Surgery, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 241–247, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. Kerin, “The hand in metastatic disease,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 77–83, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. W. A. Abdu, J. M. Murphy, and V. A. Memoli, “Giant cell tumor of the scaphoid: a case report and review of the literature,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1003–1005, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. B. Posinkovic, “Riesenzellgeschwulst (Osteoklastom) des Kahnbeins der Hand,” Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und ihre Grenzgebiete, vol. 119, no. 04, pp. 427–429, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y.-W. Tarng, S.-W. Yang, and C.-J. Hsu, “Surgical treatment of multifocal giant cell tumor of carpal bones with preservation of wrist function: case report,” The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 262–265, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. I. Hmouri and A. Elbardouni, “Tumeur à cellules géantes des os du carpe, localisation rare,” Pan African Medical Journal, vol. 21, p. 135, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Campanacci, N. Baldini, S. Boriani, and A. Sudanese, “Giant-cell tumor of bone,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 106–114, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. K. C. Saikia, S. K. Bhuyan, S. Goswami, and A. Bora, “Rare site giant cell tumors: report of two cases on phalanges of the finger and review of literature,” Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 193–197, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. D. G. Branstetter, S. D. Nelson, J. C. Manivel et al., “Denosumab induces tumor reduction and bone formation in patients with giant-cell tumor of bone,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 4415–4424, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Wojcik, A. E. Rosenberg, M. A. Bredella et al., “Denosumab-treated giant cell tumor of bone exhibits morphologic overlap with malignant giant cell tumor of bone,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 72–80, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. D. Thomas, R. Henshaw, K. Skubitz et al., “Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: an open-label, phase 2 study,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 275–280, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Chawla, R. Henshaw, L. Seeger et al., “Safety and efficacy of denosumab for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumour of bone: interim analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 study,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 901–908, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. S. Chang, S. J. Suratwala, K. M. Jung et al., “Bisphosphonates may reduce recurrence in giant cell tumor by inducing apoptosis,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 426, pp. 103–109, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Balke, L. Campanacci, C. Gebert et al., “Bisphosphonate treatment of aggressive primary, recurrent and metastatic giant cell tumour of bone,” BMC Cancer, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 462, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Chris Hoedt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

833 Views | 275 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.