Case Reports in Pediatrics

Case Reports in Pediatrics / 2014 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 516256 |

Mohamed A. Hendaus, Ahmad Alhammadi, Mehdi M. Adeli, Fawzia Al-Yafei, "The Value of Family History in Diagnosing Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders", Case Reports in Pediatrics, vol. 2014, Article ID 516256, 3 pages, 2014.

The Value of Family History in Diagnosing Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders

Academic Editor: Ozgur Cogulu
Received04 May 2014
Accepted16 Jul 2014
Published05 Aug 2014


Eliciting proper family medical history is critical in decreasing morbidity and mortality in patients with primary immunodeficiency disorders (PIDs). Communities with a common practice of consanguinity have a high rate of PIDs. We are presenting 2 cases where digging deeply into the family medical history resulted in the diagnosis of Omenn syndrome, a possibly fatal entity if not managed in a reasonable period.

1. Introduction

Primary immunodeficiency disorders (PIDs) usually refer to various genetic disorders that disturb fundamental parts of the immune system resulting in flaws in function, differentiation, or both of these parts [1]. Early diagnosis of PID is crucial because often lifesaving interventions can be provided to decrease the rate of morbidity and mortality [2]. A major proportion of affected infants and children are offspring of consanguineous marriage; in addition, family medical history is very common in PID and it is an essential component in the diagnosis [3].

We are presenting two cases that show how crucial eliciting proper family medical history is in saving lives of infants and children with PID.

2. Case #1

A 3-month-old Pakistani female presented with generalized rash and failure to gain appropriate weight. The infant was born full term via normal spontaneous vaginal delivery. The initial family history was unremarkable except that parents are first degree cousins. The patient was admitted for failure to thrive workup. On examination, the vitals were appropriate for age. Anthropometric measurements were normal for age except the weight was below the 3rd percentile. The patient looked nontoxic, but thin. There was a generalized maculopapular rash with two bullae on the gluteal area. The rest of the examination was unremarkable. The rash disappeared on the second day of admission. Laboratory investigations showed hemoglobin of 6.6 g/dL, positive direct Coombs test, and positive occult blood.

The differential diagnosis was cow milk allergy, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and sepsis.

We decided to transfuse the patient with packed red blood cells (PRBCs) due to severe anemia and premedicated the patient with diphenhydramine. Severe diffuse erythema and irritability developed and we had to discontinue the transfusion process. We reassessed the family medical history and the father mentioned that two older siblings passed away while receiving PRBC for the same condition. The new family medical history prompted us to broaden our laboratory investigation.

Her lab results showed white blood count (WBC) of 5400/uL, decreased absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) 2300/uL, increased immunoglobulin E (IgE) 213 Ku/L, IgA (98 mg/dL), and IgM (275 mg/dL). The lymphocyte subpopulation showed CD4 lymphopenia (212 cells/uL) and significant reduction in B cells (193 cells/uL) with normal NK cells count (1211 cells/uL); the majority of T cells receptors showed abnormal gamma/delta receptors, which can be seen in Omenn syndrome and hypomorphic RAGI/II mutation. In addition, the T cell function assay was abnormally low (below 15% of control). All of this confirmed the diagnosis of SCID variant.

3. Case #2

A 3-month-old Qatari female was admitted due to generalized rash, lymphadenopathy, and hepatosplenomegaly diagnosed by her pediatrician. The infant was born full term via normal spontaneous vaginal delivery. The initial family history was unremarkable except that parents are first degree cousins. On examination, the vitals were appropriate for age as well as the anthropometric measurements. There was a generalized maculopapular rash. In addition there were bilateral, nontender, nonerythematous axillary lymph nodes with diameter of 0.5 cm. The liver and spleen were palpable 3 cm below the costal margin. The rest of the examination was unremarkable. On further family medical history reassessment, it showed that both parents are carriers of Omenn syndrome and two siblings are affected by the disease.

Laboratory investigation showed that our patient had WBC of 9500/uL, lymphopenia (ALC: 600 cells/uL) with low T cells (7 cells/uL), very low both CD4 (4 cells/uL) and CD8 (2 cells/uL), absent B cells (0.00 cells/uL), and normal NK cells count (133 cells/uL) in the lymphocyte subpopulation; T cell function test showed no response to mitogens. In addition, the immunoglobulins levels showed low IgA (<5 mg/dL) and IgM (<4 mg/dL) with high IgE for age (2 Ku/L); all this confirmed the diagnosis of SCID variant.

Both cases were sent for bone marrow transplant (BMT) abroad due to the unavailability of those services in our institution.

4. Discussion

PIDs are acquired by different modes of inheritance [4]. Communities with a common practice of consanguinity, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Morocco, Egypt, Kuwait, and Oman, have a high rate of PIDs [3]. In addition, autosomal recessive inheritance is not the only culprit in consanguineous marriage, but multifactorial factors play a role as well [5]. In infants and children with PID, a family history is positive in roughly 66% of all patients, with the highest rate in immune dysregulation (up to 100%) and phagocyte defects (92%) [3].

Family history is one of the components of the ten warning signs of PIDs as reported by Jeffrey Modell Foundation (JMF) [6]. Arkwright and Gennery studied the validity of these warning signs and found that family history is a strong identifier in PID [7]. Eliciting proper family history of PIDs is known to be crucial in avoiding delay in diagnosis and hence morbidity and mortality [8].

In a large study conducted by Rezaei et al., it was found that 65.6% of PID patients were the results of consanguineous marriages. Consanguinity was found to be 75.8% in combined immunodeficiency, 77.8% in cellular immunodeficiency, 72.5% in defects of phagocytic function, 58.6% in other immunodeficiencies, 54.1% in predominantly antibody deficiency, and 50% in complement deficiency [9].

Omenn syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder that presents with lymphocytic infiltration of the gut, liver, spleen, and skin that results in skin changes similar to graft-versus-host disease; in addition, affected children present with diarrhea and failure to thrive [10].

The majority of mutations in Omenn syndrome are missense mutations in recombinase activating genes RAG1 and RAG2. Those mutations are usually detected on chromosome 11 [11, 12].

Children with Omenn syndrome usually present with hypogammaglobulinemia and elevated serum immunoglobulin E levels [10]. Moreover, affected children usually have absent B cells with present natural killers (NK) cells. The T lymphocytes count might be normal to high with variable distribution ratio of CD4+ : CD8+ subsets [13].

All children with Omenn syndrome have a high mortality rate in the first six months of age unless allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is offered [10].

Our patients’ parents perceived consanguinity and family medical history as unremarkable. Parent’s perception might be different from the physician’s. Moreover, people perceive family medical history differently and hence might be misleading. Hunt et al. stated that some individuals required a large number of affected relatives to perceive that they have a substantial family medical history [14].

Since family medical history could be lifesaving, some authors advocate for going one step further and interview additional family members, review death certificates, autopsy reports, and even review family members’ medical reports [15].

Primary care physicians (PCPs) do not always elicit good family medical history and it is usually attributed to lack of time [16]. In addition, PCPs allot less than the suggested time to elicit family history information [15]. Other barriers, as perceived by PCPs, are lack of skills to take appropriate family medical history and counseling [17, 18] and lack of knowledge in the genetic field to merge up-to-date medical information in their practice [19]. Our team members reconsidered the initial elicited family medical history per patients’ clinical course. More detailed history and definite determination by physicians were indispensable in the diagnoses of our patients.

5. Conclusion

Eliciting proper family medical history might be crucial in decreasing morbidity and mortality in infants and children. It is very important to educate communities that consanguineous marriage might be detrimental for the health of new generation. In addition, premarital counseling as well as newborn screening is recommended.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. N. Rezaei, F. A. Bonilla, K. Sullivan, E. de Vries, and J. S. Orange, “An introduction to primary immunodeficiency diseases,” in Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases, N. Rezaei, A. Aghamohammadi, and L. D. Not-arangelo, Eds., pp. 1–38, Springer, Berlin, Germany. View at: Google Scholar
  2. W. Al-Herz, M. E. Zainal, M. Salama et al., “Primary immunodeficiency disorders: survey of pediatricians in Kuwait,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 379–383, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Ehlayel, A. Bener, and M. Abu Laban, “Effects of family history and consanguinity in primary immunodeficiency diseases in children in Qatar,” Open Journal of Immunology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 47–53, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  4. J. M. Puck and R. L. Nussbaum, “Genetic principles and technologies in the study of Immune disorders,” in Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases: A Molecular and Genetic Approach, H. D. Ochs, C. I. E. Smith, and J. M. Puck, Eds., pp. 16–26, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  5. A. Bener, “Consanguineous marriages and their effect on common diseases in the Qatari population,” in Genetic Disorders in the Arab World: Qatar, vol. 4, pp. 30–39, 2012, View at: Google Scholar
  6. Jeffrey Modell Foundation, 10 warning signs of primary immunodeficiency ichildren, 2009,
  7. P. D. Arkwright and A. R. Gennery, “Ten warning signs of primary immunodeficiency: a new paradigm is needed for the 21st century,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1238, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. Azarsiz, N. Gulez, N. Edeer Karaca, G. Aksu, and N. Kutukculer, “Consanguinity rate and delay in diagnosis in Turkish patients with combined immunodeficiencies: a single-center study,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 106–111, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. Rezaei, Z. Pourpak, A. Aghamohammadi et al., “Consanguinity in primary immunodeficiency disorders; the report from Iranian primary immunodeficiency registry,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 145–151, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. I. B. Elnour, S. Ahmed, K. Halim, and V. Nirmala, “Omenn's Syndrome: a rare primary immunodeficiency disorder,” Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 133–138, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  11. A. Villa, S. Santagata, F. Bozzi, L. Imberti, and L. D. Notarangelo, “Omenn syndrome: a disorder of RAG1 and RAG2 genes,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 87–97, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. A. Oettinger, B. Stanger, D. G. Schatz et al., “The recombination activating genes, RAG 1 and RAG 2, are on chromosome 11p in humans and chromosome 2p in mice,” Immunogenetics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 97–101, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. V. Martin, P. B. Willoughby, V. Giusti, G. Price, and L. Cerezo, “The lymph node pathology of Omenn's syndrome,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1082–1087, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. K. Hunt, C. Emslie, and G. Watt, “Lay constructions of a heart disease: potential for misunderstandings in the clinical encounter?” The Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9263, pp. 1168–1171, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  15. E. C. Rich, W. Burke, C. J. Heaton et al., “Reconsidering the family history in primary care,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 273–280, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  16. R. T. Acton, N. M. Burst, L. Casebeer et al., “Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Alabama's primary care physicians regarding cancer genetics,” Academic Medicine, vol. 75, no. 8, pp. 850–852, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E. K. Watson, D. Shickle, N. Qureshi, J. Emery, and J. Austoker, “The “new genetics” and primary care: GPs' views on their role and their educational needs,” Family Practice, vol. 16, pp. 420–425, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  18. A. Fry, H. Campbell, H. Gudmunsdottir et al., “GPs' views on their role in cancer genetics services and current practice,” Family Practice, vol. 16, pp. 468–474, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  19. D. Bragg, D. Simpson, R. Treat, and R. Holloway, “The Genetics in Primary Care (GPC) Faculty Development Initiative Training Program: Final Evaluation Report,” GPC External Evaluation Team from the Medical College of Wisconsin, 2002. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Mohamed A. Hendaus et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.