Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Pulmonology
Volume 2016, Article ID 5134969, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5134969
Case Report

Community-Acquired Moraxella catarrhalis Bacteremic Pneumonia: Two Case Reports and Review of the Literature

Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Instituto Nacional de Silicosis (INS), Área del Pulmón, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Oviedo, 33005 Oviedo, Spain

Received 4 January 2016; Accepted 2 February 2016

Academic Editor: Fabio Midulla

Copyright © 2016 Miguel Angel Ariza-Prota et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Moraxella (formerly Branhamella) catarrhalis was discovered at the end of the nineteenth century, and for many decades it was considered to be a harmless commensal of the upper respiratory tract. It is a Gram-negative, aerobic diplococcus considered to be the third most common pathogen isolated in childhood sinusitis and otitis media and in adult chronic lower respiratory disease, as well as an etiological agent of pneumonia in immunosuppressed patients or those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Moraxella catarrhalis pneumonia is rarely associated with bacteremia. Here, we present two cases of community-acquired Moraxella catarrhalis bacteremic pneumonia.

1. Introduction

Moraxella catarrhalis is an important pathogen that causes a lower respiratory tract infection in healthy hosts and patients with chronic lung disease. Although it is a major pathogen of the lower respiratory tract, it rarely causes bacteremia [1]. Here, we present two cases of community-acquired Moraxella catarrhalis bacteremic pneumonia in adults; the first case is in an immunosuppressed patient, and the second is in a healthy immunocompetent patient.

2. Case Presentation 1

An 85-year-old Spanish female was admitted to our hospital in March 2015, after she had experienced five days with a cough, hemoptoic sputum, dyspnea, and a fever. She had no known toxic habits or surgical background. She was diagnosed with tuberculosis when she was a child, and in 2009, Mycobacterium fortuitum was isolated in a sputum culture for which she received treatment with Isoniazid, Rifampin, and Pyrazinamide. She was diagnosed with Diffuse Large B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (stage 1A) in 2007 and received treatment with Rituximab and complementary radiotherapy with a favorable response. She was also diagnosed with cryoglobulinemic vasculitis in 1999 and was on corticosteroid treatment at the time.

Clinical findings were as follows: body temperature 36.2°C, blood pressure 96/60 mmHg, heart rate 160 beats/min, respiratory rate 30 breaths/min, and oxygen saturation 88% (room air). The physical examination revealed a disseminated petechial rash over her body; pulmonary auscultation showed diffuse rhonchi and diminished respiratory sounds at the left lung base. Laboratory tests revealed the following: 11.7 g hemoglobin; white blood cell count 5,000 × 109/L with 90% neutrophils; C-reactive protein level 4.0 mg/dL; procalcitonin level 1.06 μg/L; and the platelet count, arterial blood clotting, and the rest of the biochemical tests were within normal ranges.

The chest X-ray revealed a left lung basal infiltrate (Figure 1). All three blood cultures obtained on admission showed Moraxella catarrhalis growth, which was B-lactamase-positive and susceptible to Ceftriaxone, Azithromycin, and Levofloxacin. Sputum cultures were negative, and a chest X-ray was performed during her hospitalization showing radiological improvement. The patient was treated with Levofloxacin for two weeks with clinical improvement and was discharged. She suffered a left femur fracture three months later and died during her hospitalization.

Figure 1: Chest X-ray on admission: left lower lobe alveolar infiltrate.

3. Case Presentation 2

A 76-year-old Spanish female was referred to our hospital in January 2015 because she had experienced three days with a fever and cough with nonproductive sputum. She had no known toxic habits or surgical or medical background. Clinical findings were as follows: body temperature 38°C, blood pressure 130/90 mmHg, heart rate 90 beats/min, respiratory rate 22 breaths/min, and oxygen saturation 92% (room air). The physical examination was normal, except for pulmonary auscultation where diminished respiratory sounds and crackles were found bilaterally at the bases of both lungs. Laboratory tests (complete blood count, biochemical and arterial blood clotting) were within normal ranges, except for the C-reactive protein level which was 4.2 mg/dL.

The chest X-ray showed an alveolar infiltrate in the right upper lobe (Figure 2). Blood cultures showed Moraxella catarrhalis growth (B-lactamase negative). A control chest X-ray showed radiological improvement. The patient was treated with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid for ten days with clinical improvement and was discharged. She remained well five months later.

Figure 2: Chest X-ray on admission: right upper lobe alveolar infiltrate.

4. Discussion

Moraxella catarrhalis, while it is a major pathogen of the lower respiratory tract, rarely causes bacteremia [1]. M. catarrhalis is a Gram-negative, aerobic diplococcus, which has undergone several changes in nomenclature and periodic changes in its perceived status as either a commensal or a pathogen [2]. It is now accepted as the third most common pathogen of the respiratory tract after Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. In immunocompromised hosts, the bacterium can cause a variety of severe infections, including pneumonia, endocarditis, septicemia, and meningitis [3].

In a report of 58 cases of Moraxella catarrhalis bacteremia, neutropenia was the leading underlying disorder [4]. Neutrophils are considered to be important for the host defense against M. Catarrhalis [4]. M. catarrhalis bacteremia has nonspecific symptoms, being particularly severe and fatal in immunocompromised patients. Therefore, mortality may vary depending on comorbid illness and clinical presentation of the infection. Skin lesions such as purpuric and petechial rash were observed in our first case. Although there are no pathognomonic clinical signs suggesting M. catarrhalis bacteremia, it has been reported that petechiae and purpura are observed in 25% of patients, and most commonly in children [5].

We used PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/) to search for literature on M. catarrhalis bacteremic pneumonia with the following index words: Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis bacteremic pneumonia. A total of 8 clinical cases were found in the search. Only one of these cases was an immunocompetent patient; the rest were immunocompromised hosts. In our second case, the patient was healthy and not immunosuppressed, which makes it even rarer and more interesting due to its almost zero frequency. In a report of Moraxella isolates submitted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States between 1953 and 1980, no strains of M. catarrhalis were isolated from the blood [6]. It has been reported that 45% of M. catarrhalis pneumonia patients died of their underlying disease within three months of hospital admission [7]. The seasonal recovery of M. catarrhalis in respiratory infections is significantly increased during the late fall through early spring period [8]. This seasonal pattern raises the possibility of a viral “trigger” mechanism responsible for respiratory tract colonization or infection with M. catarrhalis [8]. One of the two isolates of our patients was beta-lactamase positive. B-lactamases, especially BRO-1, are found in 67% to 80% of M. catarrhalis strains [7].

Three multicenter studies (the Susceptibility to the Antimicrobials Used in the Community in Spain [SAUCE] studies) have been carried out to evaluate the antibiotic resistance rates among respiratory pathogens [9, 10]. One of the most remarkable findings was the increasing prevalence of isolates belonging to the β-lactamase-nonproducing ampicillin resistance (BLNAR) phenotype. However, neither the molecular basis of the Spanish BLNAR strains nor their molecular epidemiology has been characterized so far. Empiric use of penicillin, ampicillin, or amoxicillin for these organisms can no longer be recommended, and routine susceptibility testing is necessary. The beta-lactamase inhibitors clavulanic acid and sulbactam are highly active in vitro against beta-lactamase producing strains [11]. Although sporadic resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole has been reported [12], this combination is also a good alternative. In the United States and Europe, the proportion of BLNAR isolates remains very low [13], while the proportion of BLNAR strains in Japan has rapidly increased over the last decade [14]. The high prevalence of these resistant organisms is attributed to the frequent use of oral and intravenous cephem antibiotic agents in Japan [15]. These BLNAR strains show higher levels of resistance to expanded- and broad-spectrum cephems than non-BLNAR strains, which can cause serious clinical problems.

5. Conclusion

We have reported two new cases of Moraxella catarrhalis bacteremic pneumonia. This is a very rare event, and only one case has been described in the literature regarding an immunocompetent patient. These cases illustrate not only the fact that Moraxella can cause bacteremia, but perhaps more importantly the fact that in diagnostic terms only the blood cultures allowed for a diagnosis. We believe that blood cultures should always be taken in cases of pneumonia and that the ability of this organism to produce B-lactamase and its potential to produce a fatal outcome should warn us that this is a pathogen that should not be underrated despite its low occurrence rate.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. B. W. Catlin, “Branhamella catarrhalis: an organism gaining respect as a pathogen,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 293–320, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. C. Enright and H. McKenzie, “Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis—clinical and molecular aspects of a rediscovered pathogen,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 360–371, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. M. Verduin, C. Hol, A. Fleer, H. van Dijk, and A. van Belkum, “Moraxella catarrhalis: from emerging to established pathogen,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 125–144, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. P. A. Ioannidis, M. Worthington, J. K. Griffiths, and D. R. Snydman, “Spectrum and significance of bacteremia due to Moraxella catarrhalis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 390–397, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. Pórsson, V. Haraldsdóttir, and M. Kristjánsson, “Moraxella catarrhalis bacteraemia. A report on 3 cases and a review of the literature,” Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 105–109, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. R. Graham, J. D. Band, C. Thornsberry, D. G. Hollis, and R. E. Weaver, “Infections caused by Moraxella, Moraxella urethralis, Moraxella-like groups M-5 and M-6, and Kingella kingae in the United States, 1953–1980,” Reviews of Infectious Diseases, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 423–431, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. W. Wright, R. J. Wallace Jr., and J. R. Shepherd, “A descriptive study of 42 cases of Branhamella catarrhalis pneumonia,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 88, supplement 1, no. 5, pp. S2–S8, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. A. Sarubbi, J. W. Myers, J. J. Williams, and C. G. Shall, “Respiratory infections caused by Branhamella catarrhalis. Selected epidemiologic features,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 88, supplement 5, pp. 9S–14S, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. A. García-Rodríguez, F. J. Baquero, J. García de Lomas, and L. Aguilar, “Antimicrobial susceptibility of 1,422 Haemophilus influenzae isolates from respiratory tract infections in Spain: results of 1-year (1996-97) multicenter surveillance study,” Infection, vol. 27, pp. 265–267, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  10. E. Pérez-Trallero, C. García de la Fuente, C. García-Rey et al., “Geographical and ecological analysis of resistance, coresistance, and coupled resistance to antimicrobials in respiratory pathogenic bacteria in Spain,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1965–1972, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. J. Wallace, V. A. Steingrube, D. R. Nash et al., “BRO β-lactamases of Branhamella catarrhalis and subgenus Moraxella, including evidence for chromosomal β-lactamase transfer by conjugation in B. catarrhalis, M. nonliquefaciens, and M. lacunata,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1845–1854, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  12. L. Robledano, M. J. Rivera, I. Otal, and R. Gómez-Lus, “Enzymatic modification of aminoglycoside antibiotics by Branhamella catarrhalis carrying an R factor,” Drugs under Experimental and Clinical Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 137–143, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  13. K. Hasegawa, K. Yamamoto, N. Chiba et al., “Diversity of ampicillin-resistance genes in Haemophilus influenzae in Japan and the United States,” Microbial Drug Resistance, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Hasegawa, N. Chiba, R. Kobayashi et al., “Rapidly increasing prevalence of β-lactamase-nonproducing, ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae type b in patients with meningitis,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1509–1514, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Ubukata, “BLNAR (beta-lactamase-nonproducing ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae),” Nippon Rinsho, vol. 61, supplement 3, pp. 176–181, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus