Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Pulmonology
Volume 2019, Article ID 8754951, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8754951
Case Report

Severe and Fatal Multilobar Nonclassic Radiation Pneumonitis following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Treatment of Inoperable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Report of Two Cases and Possible Enhancement by Concurrent Amiodarone

1Radiation Oncology, Carl Kirkland Cancer Center, 620 W. Forest Ave, Jackson, TN 38301, USA
2Carl Kirkland Cancer Center, 620 W. Forest Ave., Jackson, TN 38301, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Anastasios Georgiou; moc.nsm@uoigroegla

Received 13 April 2019; Accepted 29 June 2019; Published 4 August 2019

Academic Editor: Akif Turna

Copyright © 2019 Anastasios Georgiou and Adam Farmer. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is considered the standard of care for treatment of inoperable early stage non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. SBRT delivers a very high dose of ionizing radiation to a relatively small region encompassing the tumor and spares a significant portion of the remaining lung from high doses. However, the conformal high dose comes at the expense of treating a larger volume of normal lung to lower doses. In general, this has been deemed to be acceptable with an overall lower risk of radiation pneumonitis. However, in the face of predisposing factors, the higher doses delivered by this technique may lead to an increase in radiation pneumonitis. We report on two patients being treated with SBRT in which severe radiation pneumonitis developed in spite of our radiation dosimetry being significantly below the acceptable limit for lung toxicity. Both patients developed a “fulminant” form of radiation pneumonitis with radiographic abnormalities well beyond the treated volume. In one patient, the disease proved fatal. Both patients were on amiodarone at the time SBRT was administered. Given the rarity of fulminant radiation pneumonitis, especially with the relatively small fields treated by SBRT, we suspect that amiodarone enhanced the pulmonary toxicity.

1. Introduction

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now considered the standard of care for treatment of inoperable early stage non-small cell carcinoma of the lung [1]. SBRT delivers a very high dose of ionizing radiation to a relatively small region encompassing the tumor and spares a significant portion of the remaining lung from high doses. This can be achieved by a variety of techniques with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), an advanced form of Intensity Modulate Radiation Therapy (IMRT) that dynamically delivers a precisely-sculpted 3D dose distribution with a 360-degree rotation of the linear-accelerator gantry in a single or multi-arc treatment, being an accepted form of delivery of the dose. However, the conformal high dose comes at the expense of treating a larger volume of normal lung to lower doses [2]. In the absence of predisposing factors, the use of VMAT may result in a decrease in the risk of radiation pneumonitis [3, 4]. However, even with the use of highly conformal techniques, patients with predisposing factors such as contralateral pneumonectomy [5], immunosuppression[6], administration of concurrent chemotherapy [7], and interstitial lung disease[8, 9] may be at increased risk for radiation pneumonitis.

We present two patients treated with VMAT based SBRT who developed severe bilateral pulmonary infiltrates highly suggestive of radiation pneumonitis. Of the two patients, one rapidly deteriorated and the process proved fatal. In both cases, the degree of radiographic abnormality was out of proportion to the expected pattern of radiation pneumonitis especially since both patients received SBRT. The doses to the normal surrounding lung were well within the accepted limits. However, given the striking radiographic abnormalities that were noted in all lung fields, even those receiving very little radiation exposure, a review was made to identify any previously unknown predisposing factors.

With the exception of both patients being on amiodarone, a known pulmonary toxin, other contributing etiologies were ruled out as best as possible. A review of the literature led to a finding that amiodarone is also a photosensitizer. Furthermore, there have been a few older case reports in which amiodarone was suspected of enhancing radiation mucositis. To our knowledge, there are no reports of amiodarone enhanced radiation pulmonary toxicity. However, this may be due to the fact that up until recently, the majority of patients have been treated with techniques giving much lower radiation doses to large volumes of the lung and with much lower doses per fraction than those administered via SBRT.

2. Case Presentation

The authors note that written informed consent was obtained agreeing to publication of the following two cases.

2.1. Patient 1

An 81-year-old female presented with increasing cough and a chest x-ray revealed a right lower lung mass. Subsequent work-up with CT scans, PET scan, and needle core-biopsy yielded a diagnosis of a clinical stage T1cN0M0 adenocarcinoma of the lung. Her past medical history was pertinent in that she had chronic atrial fibrillation for which she had undergone cardiac ablation and placement of a permanent pacemaker. Pulmonary function studies revealed an FEV1 of 0.97 liters which was 56% of predicted. Her medications included allopurinol 300mg daily, atenolol 50mg daily, diltiazem extended release 180mg daily, furosemide 40mg daily, rivaroxaban 15mg daily and, amiodarone 200mg twice daily. The patient had been on amiodarone for at least three years and after first-line therapy for atrial fibrillation had been ineffective.

After presentation at a multi-disciplinary lung cancer conference, it was decided that she was not a surgical candidate. Therefore, she was treated with a total of 50Gy in 5 fractions of SBRT using two co-planar arcs (Figure 1). The Dose-Volume Histogram (DVH) for the treatment plan showed total lung minus target dose within accepted guidelines (Figure 2).

Figure 1: SBRT plan for Patient 1 showing conformal radiation dose delivery to the right pulmonary mass.
Figure 2: DVH showing total lung minus target dose for patient 1.

One month later, she presented with mild dyspnea and a nonproductive cough. She denied fevers, chills, hemoptysis, weight loss, or chest pain. Her physical examination did reveal coarse rales in the right lung field. A chest x-ray at that time revealed a new right upper lung infiltrate at the treated site (Figure 3). Her laboratory work was unremarkable with no elevation of the white blood cell count. A diagnosis of radiation pneumonitis was made and she was placed on prednisone 20 milligrams b.i.d.

Figure 3: A chest X-ray showing the development of lung infiltrates in and around the treated right lung mass occurring one month following completion of SBRT.

Unfortunately, she presented 5 days later to the emergency room with increasing dyspnea and nonproductive cough. A chest x-ray now revealed bilateral pulmonary infiltrates (Figure 4). There had been marked worsening of the infiltrates in the right lung. The patient’s respiratory status declined and she required intubation and mechanical ventilation

Figure 4: A chest X-ray, taken 5 days after the chest X-ray depicted in Figure 3, revealing rapid progression of lung infiltrates in multiple lobes.

A nuclear medicine ventilation/perfusion scan revealed a low probability for pulmonary emboli. A CT scan of the chest revealed diffuse bilateral pulmonary infiltrates in all lobes of both lungs (Figure 5).

Figure 5: CT scan images above the plane, thru the plane, and below the plane of SBRT treatment showing diffuse infiltrates ((a), (b), and (c) images respectively).

Urine tests for Streptococcus Pneumonia antigen, Histoplasma antibody, Blastomycosis antibody, and Legionella antigen were negative. Serum tests for Cryptococcal antigen, Histoplasma antibody, Coccidioides antibody, Blastomycosis antibody, and Aspergillus antibody were negative. Blood cultures and urine cultures were negative. A respiratory viral panel was negative.

She was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone. Empiric intravenous antibiotic and antifungal therapy was started with doxycycline, meropenem, vancomycin, and caspofungin. Her rivaroxaban was discontinued in preparation for fiber-optic bronchoscopy once the risk of bleeding during the procedure had subsided. Her amiodarone was not discontinued.

In spite of maximal support, she succumbed to her disease within 72 hours after her initial presentation with the suspected radiation induced changes and prior to evaluation with bronchoscopy.

2.2. Patient 2

A 69-year-old gentleman initially presented with left-sided chest pain and upper abdominal pain. A CT scan of the chest was performed that revealed a 4.3 cm mass in the posterior left lower lung. A needle core biopsy revealed a moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Staging studies included a PET and MRI of the brain. This gentleman’s disease was staged as a clinical T2N0M0 lung cancer.

This gentleman's past medical history was significant for a prior stroke in the left middle cerebral artery region leaving him with right-sided weakness. He had significant coronary artery disease and had undergone prior coronary artery bypass grafting. His medications included aspirin 81mg daily, tamsulosin 0.4mg, levothyroxine 100mcg daily, lisinopril 20mg daily, lovastatin 40mg daily, clopidogrel 75mg daily, hydrochorothiazide 25mg- triamterene 37.5mg daily, and amiodarone 200mg daily. Amiodarone had been started two years prior due to ventricular arrhythmia.

After discussion with his cardiologist and pulmonologist, this gentleman was referred for radiation therapy. Consequently, he received a total dose of 50Gy in 5 fractions using SBRT thru two coplanar arcs (Figure 6). The Dose-Volume Histogram (DVH) for the treatment plan showed total lung minus target dose within accepted guidelines (Figure 7).

Figure 6: SBRT plan for Patient 2 showing conformal radiation dose delivery to the left pulmonary mass.
Figure 7: DVH showing total lung minus target dose for patient 2.

A CT scan of the chest performed 3 months after completion of therapy revealed a significant decrease in the size of the left lower lung mass with no evidence to suggest progression of disease. A PET scan performed 6 months later revealed complete resolution of the previously identified hypermetabolic mass in the left lower lung.

Nine months after his treatment, he presented with acute onset of confusion. He was noted to have significant hypoxemia on room air that required high-flow nasal cannula at 6 liters/minute. His arterial blood gases showed a pH of 7.45, pCO2 of 31, PO2 56. His white count was normal. A nuclear medicine ventilation perfusion scan was performed that revealed no evidence of pulmonary emboli.

A CT scan of the chest was performed that revealed volume loss in both lungs with coarse subpleural interstitial changes in the upper and lower lobes (Figure 8). Bibasilar atelectasis and pneumonitis greater in the left lung base were noted.

Figure 8: CT images above and at the plane of SBRT treatment showing lung infiltrates and dense consolidation in the left lower lung ((a) and (b) images respectively).

Urine tests for Streptococcus Pneumoniae and Legionella were negative. A respiratory viral panel was negative. Blood and urine cultures were negative. Fiber-optic bronchoscopy was performed and biopsies from the left lower lung region revealed mild inflammation. The biopsied portions of pulmonary parenchyma showed interstitial fibroblastic proliferation with fibrinous material. The pathologist commented these findings might be observed in the case of organizing/fibrous pneumonia. The bronchial brushings from left lower lung showed significant atypia favoring squamous cell carcinoma. However the bronchial washings were negative for malignancy.

He was treated empirically with intravenous levofloxacin and steroids. His amiodarone was discontinued. His pulmonary status slowly improved and he was able to avoid intubation. Given his debilitated state, the patient chose surveillance.

A CT scan of the chest performed 3 months after his hospitalization revealed no evidence to suggest progression of cancer (Figure 9). There was improvement in the previously noted interstitial and posttreatment changes throughout the lung fields.

Figure 9: CT images 3 months after the initial presentation of pneumonitis. Images are at approximately the same level as those shown in Figure 6. There has been considerable clearing of the infiltrates and dense consolidation.

This gentleman is alive 18 months later after his initial presentation with dyspnea and the images taken in Figure 6. He remains dyspneic but a follow CT of the chest shows continued improvement in the infiltrates and consolidation. In retrospect, in spite of the cytology report favoring malignancy, it is doubtful that this gentleman had recurrence of disease. The findings on the cytology most likely represent significant atypia secondary to treatment effect. Either untreated lymphangitic carcinomatosis or local recurrence leads to a very poor survival with no expectation that the radiographic abnormalities would improve.

3. Discussion

Given the rarity of bilateral fulminant radiation pneumonitis, a review was undertaken to evaluate for any common predisposing factors in the two cases. It was noted that both patients were on amiodarone which is a known pulmonary toxin. A possible interaction between VMAT based SBRT lung cancer treatment and amiodarone warrants further scrutiny in light of the following issues.

3.1. Fulminant Sporadic Radiation Pneumonitis

Radiation pneumonitis is a known complication after radiation therapy for treatment of lung malignancy. The classical presentation usually occurs within 6 months of treatment with most cases occurring within 1 to 3 months after completion of thoracic radiotherapy. It is usually associated with symptoms of a nonproductive cough and dyspnea. Radiographs of the chest usually reveal pulmonary infiltrates within the irradiated portion of the lungs [10].

However, a more fulminant form of radiation pneumonitis has been reported in the literature. This has been referred to as “sporadic” radiation pneumonitis [6, 11]. This form is considered rare and therefore descriptions are confined to case reports. Unlike the more classic pattern, there are significant pulmonary infiltrates found throughout portions of the lung fields receiving either no or very little exposure to radiation therapy. This form of radiation pneumonitis may be an immune related phenomenon similar to a hypersensitivity reaction.

Given its rarity, the authors doubt that both of our reported cases of possible fulminant radiation pneumonitis are a coincidence without any common factors.

3.2. Amiodarone Toxicity

Amiodarone is a known pulmonary toxin. The most significant factors for amiodarone pulmonary toxicity are age of the patient, duration of therapy, and dose [12]. The onset of the disease consists of progressive generalized weakness, cough, and dyspnea. In its most severe form, amiodarone pulmonary toxicity can present as an Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) with rapid onset of progressive diffuse pneumonitis and respiratory failure [13, 14].

It is well documented that amiodarone can lead to cutaneous photosensitivity [1519]. Although the wavelength of ultraviolet light thought to cause photosensitivity reactions [20] is usually considered to be nonionizing, it should be noted that there is no absolute threshold distinguishing nonionizing from ionizing radiation in this portion of the electromagnetic spectrum.

In addition to its well-known pulmonary toxicity and lesser known toxicity of photosensitivity, amiodarone has been suspected of enhancing the mucosal side effects of therapeutic radiation. Several case reports are noted in the literature in which amiodarone was suspected of leading to severe mucosal and cutaneous toxicity out of proportion to that expected from radiation therapy for treatment of head and neck cancer [2124].

It is noted that the patient with fatal pneumonitis was on amiodarone 200mg twice daily whereas the surviving second patient was on a lower dose of 200mg daily.

3.3. Dose Constraints for VMAT Based Treatment of Lung Cancer

For lung cancer patients, the use of VMAT allows the treating oncologist to better meet the traditional (emphasis added) dose constraints on lung volume [25]. Recently, there has been concern that new dose constraints needed for VMAT based therapy given a possible increase in fatal radiation pneumonitis [26]. In this regard, radiation oncologists and medical physicists have recognized that SBRT treatment via VMAT does lead to an increase in the volume of lung receiving low doses of ionizing radiation. However, in the two cases presented above, the radiographic changes were multilobar and included portions of the lungs that were clearly outside the coplanar fields used. Therefore, VMAT cannot be considered as the sole contributor to the wider effect seen in these two patients. However, in the presence of amiodarone, it is plausible that larger lung volumes exposed to low dose ionizing radiation through the use of VMAT may trigger an immune mediated response.

A review was made of the dose distribution in both patients. The radiation exposure to the normal lung was well within the accepted traditional limits for radiation induced pneumonitis.

4. Conclusion

In summary, given that the use of VMAT (or by analogy IMRT type of external beam treatment) exposes a larger volume of the normal lung to low doses of radiation therapy, coupled with amiodarone being a known pulmonary toxin and possible radiation-sensitizer, a plausible argument can be made that this combination of factors may lead to severe pulmonary toxicity. Given the increasing use of SBRT, the possibility of amiodarone induced severe radiation pneumonitis in patients being treated with this modality needs to be further investigated and documented. By reporting these two cases, our hope is that awareness of this possible interaction by pulmonologists and radiation oncologists will lead to scrutiny of past and future cases of severe fulminant radiation pneumonitis to further delineate any association between SBRT and amiodarone.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. G. M. Videtic, J. Donington, M. Giuliani et al., “Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Evidence-Based Guideline,” Practical Radiation Oncology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 295–301, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. I. S. Vogelius, D. C. Westerly, G. M. Cannon et al., “MRT may increase pneumonitis risk relative to 3D-CRT in patients receiving combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy: a modeling study of dose dumping,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 893–899, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. S. S. Yom, Z. Liao, H. H. Liu et al., “Initial evaluation of treatment-related pneumonitis in advanced-stage non-small cell lung acncer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 94–102, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. S. G. Chun, C. Hu, H. Choy et al., “Impact of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy technique for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A secondary analysis of the NRG Oncology RTOG 0617 randomized control trial,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 56–62, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Allen, M. Czerminska, P. Janne et al., “Fatal pneumonitis associated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for mesothelioma,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 640–645, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  6. P. Westhoff, D. De Ruysscher, F. Schramel et al., “Fatal bilateral pneumonitis after loco-regional thoracic chemo-radiation in a transplanted patient under immunosuppressive therapy,” Anticancer Reseach, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 7315–7317, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  7. Y. Hu, J. Li, and X. Su, “Fatal pneumonitis associated with postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy in lung cancer: Case report and review,” Oncology Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 714–716, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. D. Glick, S. Lyen, S. Kandel et al., “Impact of pretreatment interstitial lung disease on radiation pneumonitis and survival in patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT),” Clinical Lung Cancer, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. e219–e226, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. Y. Tsurugai, A. Takeda, N. Sanuki et al., “Stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias,” Radiotherapy & Oncology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 310–316, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. R. J. Wall and L. M. Schnapp, “Radiation pneumonitis,” Respiratory Care, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1255–1260, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. V. W. Osborn, A. Leaf, A. Lee et al., “Bilateral diffuse grade 5 radiation pneumonitis after intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized lung cancer,” World Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 285–288, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. S. A. Papiris, C. Triantafillidou, L. Kolilekas, D. Markoulaki, and E. D. Manali, “Amiodarone: Review of pulmonary effects and toxicity,” Drug Safety, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 539–558, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Schwaiblmair, T. Berghaus, T. Haeckel et al., “Amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity: an under-recongized and severe adverse effect?” Clinical Research in Cardiology, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 693–700, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. V. K. Singh, “Acute respiratory distress syndrome complicated by amiodarone induced pulmonary fibrosis: don’t let your guard down,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. UD01–UD02, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. N. Shah and S. Warnakulasuriya, “Case Report: Amiodarone-induced peri-oral photosensitivity,” Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 56–58, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Boyle, “Amiodarone-induced cutaneous photosensitivity,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 253-254, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. S. Yones, N. B. O'Donoghue, R. A. Palmer, H. d. Menage, and J. L. Hawk, “Persistent severe amiodarone-induced photosensitivity,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 500–502, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. Walter, H. Bradner, and G. Curtis, “Amiodarone photosensitivity,” Archives of Dermatology, vol. 120, pp. 1591–1594, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  19. J. Ferguson, H. Addo, S. Jones, B. Johnson, and W. Frain-Bell, “A study of cutaneous photosensitivity induced by amiodarone,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 537–549, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. B. Diffey, R. Chalmers, and H. Muston, “Photobiology of amiodarone: preliminary in vitro and in vivo studies,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 248–255, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. A. Hercbergs, “Early onset acute radiation toxicity and amiodarone,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 525, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. L. Demange, F. Marechal, and T. D. Nguyen, “Could amiodarone increase acute cutaneous and mucosal toxicity of radiotherapy?” International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 289, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. C. Topham, J. Brierley, and H. Tomlinson, “Toxicity and amiodarone,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 1056, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. W. De Neve, L. Fortan, and G. Storme, “Increased acute mucosal and cutaneous radiation toxicity in two patients taking amiodarone,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 224, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. H. Murshed, H. H. Liui, Z. Liao et al., “Dose and volume reduction for normal lung using intensity-modulated radiotherapy in for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 58, pp. 1258–1267, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  26. A. A. Khalil, L. Hoffmann, D. S. Moeller, K. P. Farr, and M. M. Knap, “New dose constraint reduces radiation-induced fatal pneumonitis in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy,” Acta Oncologica, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 1343–1349, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus