Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Radiology
Volume 2013, Article ID 510258, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/510258
Case Report

Sensorineural Hearing Loss after Magnetic Resonance Imaging

1Industrial Diseases Research Center, Department of Occupational Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd 89138-14389, Iran
2Department of Occupational Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd 89138-14389, Iran
3Department of Otolaryngology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd 89138-14389, Iran
4Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 81465-1148, Iran

Received 2 May 2013; Accepted 5 June 2013

Academic Editors: M. Hashimoto and L. Lampmann

Copyright © 2013 Abolfazl Mollasadeghi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. McJury and F. G. Shellock, “Auditory noise associated with MR procedures: a review,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 12, pp. 37–45, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. A. Bies and C. H. Hansen, Engineering noise control: theory and practice, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 4th edition, 2009.
  3. P. Radomskij, M. A. Schmidt, C. W. Heron, and D. Prasher, “Effect of MRI noise on cochlear function,” The Lancet, vol. 359, no. 9316, pp. 1485–1486, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Govindaraju, R. Omar, R. Rajagopalan, R. Norlisah, and N. Kwan-Hoong, “Hearing loss after noise exposure,” Auris Nasus Larynx, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 519–522, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Ahmed and F. G. Shellock, “Magnetic resonance imaging safety: implications for cardiovascular patients,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 171–182, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. H. Baradarnfar, K. Karamifar, A. H. Mehrparvar et al., “Amplitude changes in otoacoustic emissions after exposure to industrial noise,” Noise and Health, vol. 14, no. 56, pp. 28–31, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Moelker, R. A. J. J. Maas, F. Lethimonnier, and P. M. Pattynama, “Interventional MR imaging at 1.5 T: quantification of sound exposure,” Radiology, vol. 224, no. 3, pp. 889–895, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Hattori, H. Fukatsu, and T. Ishigaki, “Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner,” Nagoya Journal of Medical Science, vol. 69, no. 1-2, pp. 23–28, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. L. Price, J. P. De Wilde, A. M. Papadaki, J. S. Curran, and R. I. Kitney, “Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 13, pp. 288–293, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. P. de Wilde, B. Grainger, D. L. Price, and C. Renaud, “Magnetic resonance imaging safety issues including an analysis of recorded incidents within the UK,” Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 37–48, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. E. Brummett, J. M. Talbot, and P. Charuhas, “Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 169, no. 2, pp. 539–540, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Department of Health, Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Equipment in Clinical Use, Department of Health, London, UK, 1993.
  13. NIOSH, Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure. Revised Criteria, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, 1998.