Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Radiology
Volume 2016, Article ID 3906195, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3906195
Case Report

Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast: Advantages and Limitations of Breast Tomosynthesis

1Serviço de Imagiologia, Centro Hospitalar de Entre o Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal
2Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Povisa, Vigo, Spain

Received 1 October 2016; Accepted 4 December 2016

Academic Editor: Roberto Grassi

Copyright © 2016 Filipa Vilaverde et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Cardenosa, Clinical Breast Imaging, A Patient Focused Teaching File, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2006.
  2. S. M. Moss, H. Cuckle, A. Evans, L. Johns, M. Waller, and L. Bobrow, “Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 368, no. 9552, pp. 2053–2060, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. B. Miller, C. Wall, C. J. Baines, P. Sun, T. To, and S. A. Narod, “Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial,” British Medical Journal, vol. 348, article g366, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. P. Jeong, E. A. Franken Jr., M. Garg, L. L. Fajardo, and L. T. Niklason, “Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications,” RadioGraphics, vol. 27, pp. S231–S240, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. R. Peppard, B. E. Nicholson, C. M. Rochman, J. K. Merchant, R. C. Mayo, and J. A. Harvey, “Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic setting: indications and clinical applications,” Radiographics, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 975–990, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Gartner Roth, A. D. A. Maidment, S. P. Weinstein, S. Orel Roth, and E. F. Conant, “Digital breast tomosynthesis: lessons learned from early clinical implementation,” Radiographics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. E89–E102, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Cyrlak, P. M. Carpenter, and N. B. Rawal, “Breast imaging case of the day,” Radiographics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 245–247, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. A. Harvey, “Unusual breast cancers: useful clues to expanding the differential diagnosis,” Radiology, vol. 242, no. 3, pp. 683–694, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. G. Sheppard, G. J. Whitman, P. T. Huynh, A. A. Sahin, B. D. Fornage, and C. B. Stelling, “Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and sonographic features,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 253–257, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Gatta, G. Di Grezia, A. Ancona et al., “Underestimation of atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ at stereotaxic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy,” European Journal of Inflammation, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 825–835, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus