Case Reports in Rheumatology

Case Reports in Rheumatology / 2015 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 108459 |

Anupam Bansal, Rupali Drewek, "Sarcoidosis and Histoplasmosis: Is One a Consequence of the Other? A Case Report and Review of the Literature", Case Reports in Rheumatology, vol. 2015, Article ID 108459, 5 pages, 2015.

Sarcoidosis and Histoplasmosis: Is One a Consequence of the Other? A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Academic Editor: Mario Salazar-Paramo
Received17 Apr 2015
Revised13 Jul 2015
Accepted15 Jul 2015
Published06 Aug 2015


Sarcoidosis involves abnormal collections of inflammatory cells (granulomas) which may form as nodules in multiple organs. 90% of affected patients have respiratory tract abnormalities. We present a 61-year-old male with sarcoidosis who was admitted for respiratory distress. Fibrosing mediastinitis was seen in the chest computograph. Management was conservative and included steroids, antibiotics, and oxygen therapy. Sarcoidosis and fibrosing mediastinitis are rare. Fibrosing mediastinitis is more commonly seen with histoplasmosis. We explore the clinical similarities between histoplasmosis and sarcoidosis. We also explore the potential cause and effect relationship and workup for each disease entity.

1. Introduction

Sarcoidosis involves abnormal collections of inflammatory cells (granulomas), which may form as nodules in multiple organs. It is considered a diagnosis of exclusion and most commonly presents with respiratory symptoms. Histoplasmosis is caused by the fungus H. capsulatum and causes symptoms that are almost identical to those present with sarcoidosis. Clinicians rely on patient history, lab values, and radiological and pathological studies to distinguish between them. However, there are false negative tests and atypical findings which may complicate the diagnosis. Misdiagnosing one for the other and starting the incorrect treatment plan could cause significant morbidity. In this case, we present a male patient diagnosed with sarcoidosis. History was obtained by personal interview and clinic and hospital medical records. His radiographic finding of fibrosing mediastinitis is rare in sarcoidosis and more commonly seen with histoplasmosis. We review this case to make clinicians aware of the striking resemblance between these two entities and the workup that is recommended to accurately diagnose each disease.

2. Case Presentation

A 61-year-old male with past medical history significant for sarcoidosis was admitted with acute respiratory distress. He had severe baseline lung disease with the most recent forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 18%. Arterial blood gas analysis revealed respiratory acidosis with a pH of 7.27 and CO2 of 57 (on 50% FiO2). Due to his level of respiratory distress, he was intubated with ventilator support. He was treated with antibiotics, steroids, and airway clearance measures. Chest X-ray (CXR) showed extensive fibrocalcific scarring in the upper lobes and compensatory emphysema of the lower lobes (Figure 1). Cultures from the endotracheal tube were negative. Viral Direct Fluorescence Antibody (Viral DFA) was negative. Echocardiogram (ECHO) showed normal left ventricular systolic function with an ejection fraction of 60%, right ventricular enlargement, diastolic dysfunction, and normal pulmonary artery pressures. Ventilation/Perfusion Scan (V/Q Scan) was negative for pulmonary embolism.

Our patient first presented with respiratory symptoms at 28 years of age. His symptoms at that time included intermittent fatigue, shortness of breath, a “sore” tongue, and “facial swelling.” While spirometry was normal, his CXR revealed left hilar adenopathy and calcification. Mediastinoscopy was performed, including a mediastinal lymph node biopsy where he was found to have noncaseating granulomas. The fungal cultures and AFB (acid fast bacilli) stains by bronchoscopy were negative. The patient was diagnosed with sarcoidosis and started on prednisone for several months, to which his symptoms responded favorably. For 2 decades, he was treated with inhaled steroids and intermittent courses of prednisone. In his 40s, he presented to an ENT (ear, nose, and throat) specialist with uveitis and a hoarse voice. The ENT physician felt that the cause of the hoarse voice was iatrogenic (secondary to inhaled steroids). No biopsy was performed. At the age of 55, a cavitary lesion was detected on chest CT, and sputum cultures were positive for Aspergillus. For this reason, oral antifungal therapy was instituted.

Initial CXRs at the age of 28 showed left hilar and left paratracheal adenopathy. There were also calcified nodules in right and left lung fields. CXRs from the age of 45 through 52 showed progressive upper lobe fibrotic changes. From the age of 52 to 62, the images were stable. The CT scan during the most recent admission was stable as compared to the one done 3 years prior. It showed extensive calcification and soft tissue within the mediastinum with retraction of the mediastinum consistent with fibrosing mediastinitis. Both upper lobes had extensive calcifications and scarring. The esophagus was dilated above the fibrosing mediastinum (Figures 2 and 3). Pulmonary lung function just before admission showed an FVC of 56% FEV1 22% with a ratio of 35%. There was no postbronchodilator response. DLCO (diffusion capacity) was 69%. TLC was 62%, FRC was 75%, and RV was 69%. These values were unchanged as compared to 5 years ago. MRI of the brain showed no evidence of neurosarcoidosis.

Socially, the patient was a nonsmoker and was not exposed to any known environmental toxins which could cause interstitial lung disease. His immunizations were up to date including BCG. He was born in India and lived in Ohio at the age of 20–30 years and in Illinois thereafter. There was no known family history of lung disease.

3. Discussion

Sarcoidosis and histoplasmosis have a striking resemblance in terms of clinical presentation. Table 1 outlines the shared clinical characteristics [1, 2]. The radiographic finding of fibrosing mediastinitis is commonly associated with histoplasmosis [3]. The fact that our patient lives in Ohio (where histoplasmosis is most common) brings up the question of whether our patient could have had a concurrent histoplasmosis infection at the time of initial presentation. This scenario would complicate management since treatment with immunosuppressants for sarcoidosis would worsen any underlying infection. Even though bronchoscopy cultures were negative for fungal infections, there is a significant rate of false negatives [4]. Wheat et al. described 11 patients diagnosed as having sarcoidosis who had laboratory evidence of histoplasmosis [4]. The diagnosis of histoplasmosis in these patients was confirmed by urine antigen, serologic tests, and/or immunodiffusion. These patients all received steroids prior to the diagnosis of histoplasmosis being confirmed. Therefore, it is difficult to say whether histoplasmosis was the primary diagnosis or was a secondary diagnosis secondary to an immunocompromised state. Baughman described 2 cases where sarcoid patients with declining respiratory status attributed their symptoms to sarcoidosis [5]. Their corticosteroid dosage was increased and their condition deteriorated even further. Ultimately, they were detected to have culture evidence of histoplasmosis. Reimann described a case of histoplasmosis in Pennsylvania which was mistakenly diagnosed as sarcoidosis [6]. Sharma described cases where diffuse histoplasmosis was found in a patient with sarcoidosis [7]. It is evident that misdiagnosis can happen and an incorrect treatment plan can cause significant morbidity.


Clinical symptomsCoughCough
Adrenal involvementAdrenal involvement
Erythema nodosumErythema nodosum
Skin ulcersSkin ulcers
Parotid gland involvementParotid gland involvement
Cervical myelopathyCervical myelopathy

Laboratory findingsHistologyHistology: noncaseating granulomas
Cultures (bronchoalveolar lavage)Elevated angiotensin converting enzyme
ImmunoassaysElevated vitamin D

Radiographic findingsHilar lymphadenopathyHilar lymphadenopathy
Fibrosing mediastinitisUpper lobe involvement
Reticulonodular opacitiesReticulonodular opacities
Granulomas along lymphatic vessels
Air trapping

Bacillomycin B

Sarcoidosis is a disease process with unknown etiology. Various genetic, environmental, and infectious processes have been hypothesized. Mycobacterium has been the longest hypothesized and most investigated potential etiology of sarcoidosis [8]. Other infectious etiologies proposed include Propionibacterium acnes and certain viruses [9]. Mycetic agents have also been proposed as potential etiologies [9]. We explored the possibility of histoplasmosis as a causal agent for development of sarcoidosis. Israel et al. investigated a case of chronic disseminated histoplasmosis and its relationship to sarcoidosis [10]. He suggested that histoplasmosis could be the primary disease and stimulate the sarcoidosis [10]. Wynbrandt and Crouser described a case in which documented pulmonary histoplasmosis allegedly evolved into sarcoidosis [11]. Interestingly, there seems to be a higher prevalence of sarcoidosis in Franklin County, Ohio (the demographic profile of which is nearly identical to that of the US) [12]. Ohio is the state where histoplasmosis is also most commonly found.

In addition to similar clinical findings, both histoplasmosis and sarcoidosis present with similar radiographic findings. Chest X-ray will show hilar lymphadenopathy, reticulonodular opacities, nodules, and air trapping. Fibrosing mediastinitis is more commonly found with histoplasmosis. However, it is (albeit rarely) associated with sarcoidosis. Devaraj et al. reported two cases in a series of 12 patients with CT images and histology of fibrosing mediastinitis (16% of patients) [13]. There were 3 separate case reports discussing fibrosing mediastinitis in patients with sarcoidosis developing complications such as pulmonary edema, pulmonary hypertension, and pulmonary artery occlusion [1416]. Strock recently found that certain HLA typing within histoplasmosis could carry a higher predisposition towards development of fibrosing mediastinitis [17]. This suggests that an aberrant host immune response could be contributing to its pathogenesis.

There are other clinical markers which can be used to diagnose sarcoidosis. However, these also can be misleading. ACE (angiotensin converting enzyme) levels are usually only elevated in sarcoidosis but there was a reported case where a patient had elevated ACE levels and Histoplasma grew from the liver biopsy specimens [7]. ACE levels can also have false positive and negative rates [18]. Noncaseating granulomas, which are the hallmark for sarcoidosis, are also seen in tissues from patients with histoplasmosis [19]. Histoplasmosis usually exhibits few angular ragged granulomas, while sarcoidosis usually contains more granulomas and has a rounded morphology [20]. A positive Kveim-Siltzbach test provides strong support for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis [21]. However, this test is rarely performed.

Laboratory methods to diagnose histoplasmosis include cultures, histology, molecular techniques, serology, and antigen detection. Histoplasma organisms are difficult to visualize in tissues and have often been initially overlooked [22]. In addition, the sensitivity can be low (9–34%) especially in acute or localized cases [23, 24]. Histopathological evaluation oftentimes lacks sensitivity. Urine antigen sensitivity was noted to be 93–100% [25]. In recent years, Histoplasma capsulatum has been identified in clinical samples by a highly sensitive molecular marker, a fragment of the Hcp 100 gene. PCR assays for the Hcp 100 gene have been validated in several studies and have shown high specificities [2629].

In summary, chronic disseminated histoplasmosis and sarcoidosis have strikingly similar features. Diagnostic tests including radiography also have similarities. Unfortunately, applying loose criteria for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis may result in overlooking specific infectious diseases including histoplasmosis. Cultures alone cannot exclude histoplasmosis due to a significant rate of false negatives. As a result, the recommended workup to accurately differentiate between sarcoidosis and histoplasmosis should include radiography, tissue biopsies, cultures, ACE level, serology, PCR assay, and urine antigen. Future studies will be needed to investigate the link between these two diseases.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. T. E. King, Patient Information: Sarcoidosis (Beyond the Basics), UpToDate, 2013.
  2. J. L. Wheat and C. A. Kaufmann, Pathogenesis and Clinical Manifestations of Disseminated Histoplasmosis, UpToDate, 2014.
  3. T. Peikert, T. V. Colby, D. E. Midthun et al., “Fibrosing mediastinitis: clinical presentation, therapeutic outcomes, and adaptive immune response,” Medicine, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 412–423, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. J. Wheat, M. L. V. French, and J. L. Wall, “Sarcoidlike manifestations of histoplasmosis,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 149, no. 11, pp. 2421–2426, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. P. Baughman and E. E. Lower, “Fungal infections as a complication of therapy for sarcoidosis,” QJM, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 451–456, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. A. Reimann and A. H. Price, “Histoplasmosis in Pennsylvania; confusion with sarcoidosis,” Pennsylvania Medical Journal, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 367–371, 1949. View at: Google Scholar
  7. O. P. Sharma, “Histoplasmosis: a masquerader of sarcoidosis,” Sarcoidosis, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 10–13, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  8. I. Brownell, F. Ramirez-Valle, M. Sanchez, and S. Prystowsky, “Evidence for mycobacteria in sarcoidosis,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 183, no. 5, pp. 573–581, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. P. Baughman, D. A. Culver, and M. A. Judson, “A concise review of pulmonary sarcoidosis,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 183, no. 5, pp. 573–581, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H. L. Israel, E. DeLamater, M. Sones, W. D. Willis, and A. Mirmelstein, “Chronic disseminated histoplasmosis. An investigation of its relationship to sarcoidosis,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 252–260, 1952. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. H. Wynbrandt and E. D. Crouser, “Transformation of pulmonary histoplasmosis to sarcoidosis: a case report,” Respiratory Medicine, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 863–864, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. B. S. Erdal, B. D. Clymer, V. O. Yildiz, M. W. Julian, and E. D. Crouser, “Unexpectedly high prevalence of sarcoidosis in a representative U.S. Metropolitan population,” Respiratory Medicine, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 893–899, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Devaraj, N. Griffin, A. G. Nicholson, and S. P. G. Padley, “Computed tomography findings in fibrosing mediastinitis,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 781–786, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. R. Hamilton-Craig, R. Slaughter, K. McNeil, F. Kermeen, and D. L. Walters, “Improvement after angioplasty and stenting of pulmonary arteries due to sarcoid mediastinal fibrosis,” Heart Lung and Circulation, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 222–225, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Załeska, K. Błasińska-Przerwa, K. Oniszh, B. Roszkowska-Śliz, and K. Roszkowski-Śliz, “Fibrosing mediastinitis with pulmonary hypertension as a rare complication of sarcoidosis,” Pneumonologia i Alergologia Polska, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 273–280, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  16. F. Yangui, J.-P. Battesti, D. Valeyre, A. B. Kheder, and P.-Y. Brillet, “Fibrosing mediastinitis as a rare mechanism of pulmonary oedema in sarcoidosis,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 455–456, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. B. Strock, S. Gaudieri, S. Mallal et al., “Fibrosing mediastinitis complicating prior histoplasmosis is associated with human leukocyte antigen DQB1*04:02—a case control study,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 15, article 206, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Lieberman, “Enzymes in sarcoidosis. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE),” Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 745–755, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  19. J. V. Walker, D. Baran, Y. N. Yakub, and R. B. Freeman, “Histoplasmosis with hypercalcemia, renal failure, and papillary necrosis. Confusion with sarcoidosis,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 237, no. 13, pp. 1350–1352, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. P. Gailey, M. E. Keeney, and C. S. Jensen, “A cytomorphometric analysis of pulmonary and mediastinal granulomas: differentiating histoplasmosis from sarcoidosis by fine-needle aspiration,” Cancer Cytopathology, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. W. J. Williams and D. G. James, “Kveim-Siltzbach test revisited,” Sarcoidosis, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 6–9, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  22. L. J. Wheat, R. B. Kohler, and R. P. Tewari, “Diagnosis of disseminated histoplasmosis by detection of Histoplasma capsulatum antigen in serum and urine specimens,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 314, no. 2, pp. 83–88, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. J. Wheat, “Improvements in diagnosis of histoplasmosis,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1207–1221, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. J. Wheat, “Current diagnosis of histoplasmosis,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 488–494, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. A. Hage, J. A. Ribes, N. L. Wengenack et al., “A multicenter evaluation of tests for diagnosis of histoplasmosis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 448–454, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. Maubon, S. Simon, and C. Aznar, “Histoplasmosis diagnosis using a polymerase chain reaction method. Application on human samples in French Guiana, South America,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 441–444, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. I. Toranzo, I. N. Tiraboschi, N. Fernández et al., “Molecular diagnosis of human histoplasmosis in whole blood samples,” Revista Argentina de Microbiologia, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  28. C. Muñoz, B. L. Gómez, A. Tobón et al., “Validation and clinical application of a molecular method for identification of Histoplasma capsulatum in human specimens in Colombia, South America,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 62–67, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. J. Buitrago, C. E. Canteros, G. Frías De León et al., “Comparison of PCR protocols for detecting Histoplasma capsulatum DNA through a multicenter study,” Revista Iberoamericana de Micologia, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 256–260, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Anupam Bansal and Rupali Drewek. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.