Case Reports in Surgery

Case Reports in Surgery / 2013 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 567186 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/567186

Christos Christoforides, Athanasios Petrou, Marios Loizou, "Idiopathic Unilateral Adrenal Haemorrhage and Adrenal Mass: A Case Report and Review of the Literature", Case Reports in Surgery, vol. 2013, Article ID 567186, 4 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/567186

Idiopathic Unilateral Adrenal Haemorrhage and Adrenal Mass: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Academic Editor: T. Çolak
Received20 Feb 2013
Accepted27 Mar 2013
Published10 Apr 2013

Abstract

We report an unusual case of idiopathic unilateral adrenal haemorrhage (AH) in a 55-year-old patient. This rare case had two characteristics that made it worth of report. First, idiopathic adrenal haemorrhage is very uncommon, and second it was presented as a huge, 23 cm diameter and 2,123 gr weight, “silent” adrenal mass. It is important to distinguish a benign lesion like this from a neoplasm, although we were not able to identify it preoperatively and the diagnosis was only made after the excised specimen was examined by a group of experienced histopathologists. Only a few similar published cases, to our knowledge, are described in the worldwide literature and even fewer of this size.

1. Introduction

Adrenal haemorrhage (AH) is an uncommon condition more frequently presented in adolescents than in adults (7 : 1). Symptoms and physical findings are not specific and vary among patients. Idiopathic, unilateral AH is a rare entity that either may have an acute presentation (e.g., idiopathic adrenal rupture) or may present as an asymptomatic adrenal mass, as has been reported by other series [1, 2]. Most authors concluded that it is usually caused by blunt abdominal trauma (traumatic adrenal rupture), but it also has occurred in liver transplant recipients and in patients with primary adrenal or metastatic tumors. Infrequently, unilateral adrenal haemorrhage is associated with otherwise uncomplicated pregnancy, neurofibromatosis 1, or long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use [36]. In the present study, we report the case of a 55-year-old patient with idiopathic unilateral adrenal haemorrhage, presenting as a huge adrenal mass.

2. Case Report

The patient was admitted to our department for the evaluation of a palpable mass in the right side of his abdomen. His past medical history and any medication he ever had were irrelevant with the current problem. Physical examination revealed a palpable mass, approximately 20 × 20 cm in size, occupying an area from the upper to the lower right abdominal quadrantus. No pain or tenderness around the mass was reported and the patient mentioned only some discomfort when he was lying at night.

His vital signs were within the normal range and the laboratory data showed mild anaemia (haemoglobin: 10.9 g/dL), WBC 8190 × 109/L, without any hepatic, renal, or adrenal dysfunction from the blood or urine examinations he had.

Moreover, his serum tumor markers and coagulation function were all within normal values.

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed a huge, well-circumscribed, 23 × 20 cm, cystic lesion between liver and right kidney with the enhancement of the capsule around the tumor.

No liver metastasis or lymph node swelling was noted. The gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that followed showed a huge multicystic lesion, in the region of the right adrenal gland, with a thick capsule containing several septations especially in the periphery of the lesion (Figures 1, 2, and 3).

The abnormality deviated the liver upwards, the right kidney downwards and posteriorly, the pancreas to the left, and the abdominal aorta and IVC were deviated to the left. The vascularity of the lesion was not clearly demonstrated, but there were large venous structures peripheral to the lesion draining into the IVC.

The previously described findings were discussed in the MDT meeting and the decision for surgery was made.

During the 3-hour exploratory laparotomy that followed the lesion was carefully dissected from the surrounding structures (i.e., liver, pancreas, and right kidney) and excised along with the surrounding fatty tissues. The lesion was firmly attached to the IVC and right renal vein, so a full isolation of both was necessary and successfully performed (Figures 4 and 5). Postoperatively, the patient was transferred to the surgical ward in a stable condition. The postoperative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged in a good condition on the 6th postoperative day.

The histopathology report described a yellow-whitish lesion with traces of normal adrenal gland tissue and appearances of adrenal haemorrhage. They reported that the lesion was consisted entirely of blood clots, fibrinoid debris, and ghost outlines of proexisting vessels. Finally, they noted that it was covered by a fibrous pseudocapsule and no evidence of malignancy was noted. The final diagnosis for this patient was idiopathic adrenal haemorrhage.

3. Discussion

Adrenal haemorrhage is a rare yet potentially life-threatening event that occurs both in traumatic conditions and in a variety of nontraumatic conditions. To our knowledge, it is an autopsy finding in most of the reported cases [3]. It may be either unilateral or bilateral. In one of the biggest published series, Vella et al. have summarized 141 cases of AH in a 25 years experience period at the Mayo Clinic [7]. They classified AH into the following seven categories: incidentaloma (28 cases), spontaneous AH (16 cases), AH associated with antiphospholipid- and heparin-associated thrombocytopenia (20 cases), postoperative AH (14 cases), AH associated with anticoagulation therapy (3 cases), AH associated with trauma (4 cases), and AH associated with sepsis (especially meningococcemia) or severe stress (56 cases). Our present case is an example of idiopathic/spontaneous AH. The incidence of idiopathic adrenal haemorrhage in some published autopsy series is very low and reaches 1.1% in some of the biggest (>25000 cases) autopsy series [3, 711].

Clinical manifestations of adrenal haemorrhage can vary widely depending on the degree and rate of haemorrhage, as well as the amount of adrenal cortex compromised by haemorrhage, as similar cases have reported [1113]. Although an isolated focal unilateral adrenal haemorrhage may present subclinically, there are reports of massive bilateral adrenal haemorrhage which led to rapid cardiovascular collapse and ultimate death because of being misdiagnosed and not treated quickly [14].

According to the underlying cause, clinical presentation varies and symptoms may include abdominal or flank pain, nausea, vomiting, weakness, weight loss, or mental confusion (adrenal insufficiency). Those are often accompanied with physical findings of fever, hypotension, abdominal tenderness or distension, and a palpable abdominal mass, as discussed elsewhere [2, 11].

The laboratory findings also vary and may include a falling haematocrit level, leukocytosis, or electrolytes abnormalities [15, 16]. Some authors concluded that diagnosis of adrenal haemorrhage is often complicated by its nonspecific presentation and tendency to occur in the setting of acute illness and other complicating medical conditions [17]. In other reported cases of a huge adrenal mass as in our patient, the differential diagnosis includes a number of varieties such as adrenal incidentaloma, pheochromocytoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, angiomyolipoma, and collision tumor [13]. The first thing to determine is whether the mass is functioning or not functioning. Functional tumors may cause Cushing’s disease from hypercortisolemia, hyperaldosteronemia, and Conn’s syndrome, or they may be virilizing tumors from steroid overproduction. Pheochromocytoma is also a primary concern when evaluating functional adrenal masses because of the potential hazards of massive catecholamine release. Nonfunctioning tumors vary significantly in appearance and presentation, and, due to that, the preoperative diagnosis is often missed, as others support [11, 18].

Imaging assists and complements the clinical and endocrine evaluation of adrenal masses. Various studies showed that, although ultrasonography is a fast, low-cost, and widely available method, it is usually limited to infants and children [19, 20]. Computed tomography (with or without IV contrast) is the cornerstone of imaging studies. It provides information regarding the homogeneity, size, presence of calcifications, extend of local invasion (in case of neoplasms), and areas of necrosis. CT can demonstrate adrenal masses >5 mm in diameter, but the most widely accepted threshold is 4 cm, with 90% sensitivity but low specificity. The majority of the existing literature supports that changes in size, shape, and radiograph absorption on unenhanced CT are useful information in predicting potential malignancy in such a mass [12, 19, 21, 22]. Others suggested magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a more accurate and safe (does not expose patient to ionizing radiation) imaging modality for diagnosing adrenal haemorrhage or haematoma, with high signal intensity on T1-weighted images. MRI also may differentiate subacute from chronic haemorrhage, but still remains an expensive and not always available imaging modality [3, 21, 22]. Some authors add adrenal scintigraphy to the imaging studies available during the investigation of such masses. Unlike other imaging, it can determine if there is extra-adrenal disease or whether a tumor is functioning. Sensitivity ranges from 77% to 89% and specificity from 88% to 100%, but radiation exposure, high cost, and limited availability restrict its use [22].

Some have proposed a descent approach to incidentally discovered adrenal mass, which includes assessing the mass size, determination of whether is solid or cystic, and excluding biochemically active tumors by all the appropriate laboratory studies [8, 23]. There are also recommendations (the NIH state-of-the-science conference statement) supporting that because benign adrenal neoplasms bigger than 6 cm are rare, solid, or cystic without clear view, adrenal masses larger than 6 cm should be surgically excised after studies of biochemical activity [10, 23]. According to these recommendations, our patient had an exploratory laparotomy with the unexpected finding that we report. From our review of the literature, we found only a few similar cases of idiopathic adrenal haemorrhage that had been diagnosed before death and treated surgically. The majority of those patients had significant abdominal pain, and the diagnosis was made at the time of the operation [1, 5, 6, 2426]. None of them is present in our case. The operative findings and the preoperative “silent” clinical presentation of such a rare entity should make us always have in mind that even the least possible diagnosis can be found in such patients [11].

4. Conclusion

Adrenal haemorrhage is a rare cause of adrenal mass and is generally associated with trauma, infection, or bleeding diathesis. Only a few isolated cases of similar pathology (idiopathic adrenal haemorrhage) exist in the literature and nearly all of them were postoperatively diagnosed as such. Though rare, signs of adrenal haemorrhage may include an asymptomatic adrenal mass and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of this problem.

References

  1. T. Kobayashi, S. Uenoyama, K. Miura, and Y. Takehara, “Idiopathic unilateral adrenal hematoma: report of a case,” Surgery Today, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 279–282, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. G. Abdullah, R. N. Stitzlein, T. A. Tallman et al., “Isolated adrenal hematoma presenting as acute right upper quadrant pain,” The Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. e215–e217, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. R. Simon and M. A. Palese, “Clinical update on the management of adrenal hemorrhage,” Current Urology Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 78–83, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  4. J. S. Carter, R. Kothari, and A. L. Jonson, “Idiopathic adrenal hemorrhage in a patient with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia,” Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 53–55, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. Imachi, K. Murao, T. Yoshimoto et al., “Idiopathic unilateral adrenal hemorrhage in an elderly patient,” Endocrine, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 249–252, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. L. Marti, J. Millet, J. A. Sosa, S. A. Roman, T. Carling, and R. Udelsman, “Spontaneous adrenal hemorrhage with associated masses: etiology and management in 6 cases and a review of 133 reported cases,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 75–82, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  7. A. Vella, T. B. Nippoldt, and J. C. Morris, “Adrenal hemorrhage: a 25-year experience at the Mayo Clinic,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 161–168, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  8. A. A. Kasperlik-Załuska, E. Rosłonowska, J. Słowińska-Srzednicka et al., “Incidentally discovered adrenal mass (incidentaloma): investigation and management of 208 patients,” Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  9. W. F. Young Jr., “The incidentally discovered adrenal mass,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 6, pp. 601–610, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. P. Luton, M. Martinez, J. Coste, and J. Bertherat, “Outcome in patients with adrenal incidentaloma selected for surgery: an analysis of 88 cases investigated in a single clinical center,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 111–117, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  11. D. A. Linos, “Adrenal incidentaloma (adrenaloma),” Hormones, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  12. C. Hoeffel, P. Legmann, J. P. Luton, Y. Chapuis, and A. Bonnin, “Spontaneous unilateral adrenal haematomas. A series of 10 cases,” Presse Medicale, vol. 23, no. 22, pp. 1023–1026, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  13. Y. Yasuo, Y. Atsushi, S. Takahito et al., “A case of idiopathic adrenal hemorrhage presented with a giant retroperitoneal tumor,” Journal of Japan Surgical Society, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2564–2568, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  14. M. A. Moore and P. J. Biggs, “Unilateral adrenal hemorrhage: an unusual presentation,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 989–992, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  15. H. Kamishirado, T. Inoue, T. Fujito et al., “Idiopathic adrenal hemorrhage,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 319, no. 5, pp. 340–342, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  16. V. P. Xarli, A. A. Steele, P. J. Davis, E. S. Buescher, C. N. Rios, and R. Garcia-Bunuel, “Adrenal hemorrhage in the adult,” Medicine, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 211–221, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  17. R. H. Rao, A. H. Vagnucci, and J. A. Amico, “Bilateral massive adrenal hemorrhage: early recognition and treatment,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 227–235, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  18. P. Anagnostis, A. Karagiannis, K. Tziomalos, A. I. Kakafika, V. G. Athyros, and D. P. Mikhailidis, “Adrenal incidentaloma: a diagnostic challenge,” Hormones, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 163–184, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  19. A. Kawashima, C. M. Sandler, R. D. Ernst et al., “Imaging of nontraumatic hemorrhage of the adrenal gland,” Radio-Graphics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 949–963, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  20. J. H. Newhouse, C. S. Heffess, B. J. Wagner, T. J. Imray, C. F. Adair, and A. J. Davidson, “Large degenerated adrenal adenomas: radiologic-pathologic correlation,” Radiology, vol. 210, no. 2, pp. 385–391, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  21. C. Hoeffel, P. Legmann, J. P. Luton, Y. Chapuis, and P. Fayet-Bonnin, “Spontaneous unilateral adrenal hemorrhage: computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings in 8 cases,” Journal of Urology, vol. 154, no. 5, pp. 1647–1651, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. D. T. Arnold, J. B. Reed, and K. Burt, “Evaluation and management of the incidental adrenal mass,” Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, vol. 16, pp. 7–12, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  23. National Institutes of Health, “Management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass (Incidentaloma),” in Proceedings of the State-of-the-Science Conference Statement, February 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  24. D. R. Solís-López, Z. Rodríguez-Hernández, D. H. Solís-López et al., “Incidental adreno-cortical adenoma, why surgery? A case report,” Puerto Rico Health Sciences, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 130–132, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  25. M. C. Lee, M. I. Chorost, J. Earle et al., “Adrenal hematoma presenting as a large left upper quadrant mass,” http://www.hcplive.com/publications/surgical-rounds/2006/2006-05/2006-05_04, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  26. E. De León Morales, O. Bielsa Gali, O. Arango Toro, N. Alonso Gracia, D. Cañís Sánchez, and A. Gelabert Mas, “Adrenal gland surgical pathology. Report of our case series and bibliographic review,” Archivos Espanoles de Urologia, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 875–883, 2003. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Christos Christoforides et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views7526
Downloads929
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.