Case Reports in Surgery

Case Reports in Surgery / 2013 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 972596 |

J. A. A. Awe, A. M. Soliman, R. W. Gourdie, "Stump Appendicitis: An Uncompleted Surgery, a Rare but Important Entity with Potential Problems", Case Reports in Surgery, vol. 2013, Article ID 972596, 4 pages, 2013.

Stump Appendicitis: An Uncompleted Surgery, a Rare but Important Entity with Potential Problems

Academic Editor: D. J. Bentrem
Received17 Feb 2013
Accepted19 Mar 2013
Published04 Apr 2013


Appendicectomy for appendicitis is one of the commonest surgical procedures performed worldwide. The residual appendiceal stump left after an initial appendectomy risks the development of stump appendicitis. Stump appendicitis is a real recognized entity but not often considered when evaluating patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain, especially those with past history of appendectomy. It remains a clinical challenge with the result that its diagnosis and effective treatment are often delayed with possible attendant morbidity or mortality. Stump appendicitis results from obstruction of the lumen of the remaining appendix stump, usually by a faecolith. This increases intraluminal pressure, impairing venous drainage and allowing subsequent bacterial infection. We present the case of a twenty-five (25)-year-old female who underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy and presented four and half (4(1/2)) months later with fever, right lower quadrant abdominal pain, and tenderness associated with repeated vomiting. Exploratory laparotomy was carried out after clinical and imaging studies which revealed big inflammatory mass with abscess at the right iliac fossa and recurrent appendicitis of the appendiceal stump. Surgical treatment is easy but recognition of this important entity but potentially dangerous condition should always be borne in mind in order to avoid delay in its diagnosis and treatment.

1. Introduction

Acute Appendicitis is one of the most common causes of abdominal pain, and it is one of the common surgical emergencies treated by general surgeons.

Most surgical personnel are quite familiar with the common complications after appendectomy such as wound infections and pelvic abscesses [1].

The postoperative development of stump appendicitis is an exceedingly rare entity with only 36 reported cases in the English language literature [24]. Stump appendicitis is an acute inflammation of the residual appendiceal stump and is an underreported complication that can occur after open or laparoscopic appendectomy [513].

The entity has been recorded as occurring from about three weeks to an interval of twenty-three (23) years after appendectomy, but our case presented only four and half (4(1/2)) months after laparoscopic appendectomy [14, 15].

With the introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy in the last fifteen to twenty (15–20) years; however, incidence of stump appendicitis has probably increased even though this was not supported by the findings of Liang et al. [3].

The fact that the diagnosis of stump appendicitis is usually not considered as the possible etiology for right lower quadrant abdominal pain in patients with prior appendectomy creates a delay in making the correct diagnosis and explains why the rate of perforation for stump appendicitis approaches 70% [16, 17].

We present this case of a twenty-five (25)-year-old female who presented in our emergency room (ER) department with right iliac fossa abdominal pain and repeated vomiting four and half (4(1/2)) months after laparoscopic appendectomy.

It is to draw attention to the fact that stump appendicitis with all its attendant complications such as perforation, abscess formation is real and should be borne in mind in the differential diagnosis of patients presented with right iliac fossa pain after appendectomy [18].

2. Case Report

A twenty-five (25)-year-old lady presented with a two-day history of stabbing abdominal pain located first in the epigastric area but later migrated to the right lower abdomen with associated repeated vomiting. This pain became more intense and continuous in the right lower abdomen.

Her last menstrual period was one week prior to presentation at the emergency room (ER).

Significant in her past medical history is the fact that she underwent laparoscopic appendectomy four and half (4(1/2)) months earlier.

On admission, the patient looked unwell with a fever of 38°C, BP = 90/60 mm Hg, and Pulse = 92/min RR = 28/min. Abdomen was tender all over but maximum in the right iliac fossa with guarding and rigidity. Bowel sounds were sluggish.

Plain abdominal X-ray and urinalysis were normal, but the total white cell count (WBC) was 19000 with 85% neutrophils.

Abdominal ultrasound (U/S) (Figure 1) and abdominal computerized tomographic scan (CT) (Figure 2) revealed inflammatory, intraperitoneal collection at the right iliac fossa (RIF) which was diagnosed radiologically as an inflammatory mass with abscess.

IV fluid with parenteral antibiotics was commenced.

The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy through lower midline incision with a view to draining the abscess.

At laparotomy, a significant stump of the original appendix was left behind, inflamed with missed faecolith at the base of the appendix. It was perforated with abscess formation (Figures 3 and 4).

The appendiceal stump with the left-behind faecolith was ligated, abscess drained followed by peritoneal toilet and wound closed in layers with a drain left in situ.

Histopathological examination of the ligated appendix stump confirmed the presence of an appendix with inflammation of surrounding adjacent tissue and abscess (Figure 5).

Postoperatively, she did well and was discharged home after one week and has since been discharged from surgical outpatient followup.

3. Discussion and Conclusion

Baumgardner in 1949 [15] was the first to describe stump appendicitis, and since then a total of 36 cases have been reported in a comprehensive review of the English language literature [2, 3].

Some reports have suggested that laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with an increased incidence of stump appendicitis when compared with open appendectomy.

However, the most recent comprehensive review of the literature examining thirty-six (36) cases of stump appendicitis by Liang et al. [3] revealed that only 34% of cases were initially performed laparoscopically, and 66% were initially performed as open surgeries, thereby, supporting that it can occur after either laparoscopic or open appendectomy [19].

Stump appendicitis is a real entity not often considered when evaluating patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain after appendectomy and may be probably an underreported problem [20, 21].

It can occur from about two (2) weeks to an interval of twenty-three (23) year after appendectomy but our case presented four and half (4(1/2)) months postlaparoscopic appendicectomy [14, 15].

Preoperative stump appendicitis diagnosis is still clinical because typically patients present with signs and symptoms similar to acute appendicitis.

Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for stump appendicitis [22, 23] in patients with a history of previous appendectomy who presented with an acute appendicitis-like picture [24, 25].

Plain films, USD, and CT [26] may all play a role in its diagnosis especially in those associated with abscess formation or perforated cases with intraperitoneal fluid collection in the right lower abdomen or in the pelvis.

The surgical error commonly ascribed to either technique of open or laparoscopic method is the inability in not adequately identifying the base of the appendix, thereby resulting in failure to completely remove [21] the appendix during the initial operation of appendicetomy.

Some authors have suggested stump inversion routinely in all cases after removal of the appendix as a way of minimizing the incidence of stump appendicitis, but others think this is not necessary as long an appendiceal stump of not more than 3 mm in depth is left behind [27, 28].

Different methods of dealing with stump appendicitis include reappendectomy with or without stump inversion, or even limited right hemicolectomy [21, 29, 30].

In our case during exploratory laparotomy, the appendiceal stump with the left behind faecolith was ligated, its base sutured, and the accompanying abscess was drained, followed by peritoneal toilet, abdominal closure and a drain left in situ.

We, therefore, recommend early recognition of this clinical entity to decrease morbidity and high rate of perforation associated with delayed diagnosis [7, 18, 31, 32].

It has therefore been proposed that diagnosis of stump appendicitis should be borne in mind in the differential diagnosis of patients presented with right lower abdominal pain with past history of appendectomy.


  1. J. K. Cama, “Recurrent abdominal pain post appendectomy: a rare case,” Pacific Health Dialog, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 78–81, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Subramanian and M. K. Liang, “A 60-year literature review of stump appendicitis: The need for a critical view,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 203, no. 4, pp. 503–507, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. K. Liang, H. G. Lo, and J. L. Marks, “Stump appendicitis: a comprehensive review of literature,” The American Surgeon, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 162–166, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  4. B. P. Watkins, S. N. Kothari, and J. Landercasper, “Stump appendicitis: case report and review,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 167–171, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  5. S. K. Baek, M. S. Kim, Y. H. Kim, W. J. Chung, and J. H. Kwon, “A case of stump appendicitis after appendectomy,” The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 45–47, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  6. E. Bosma, J. A. Roukema, and M. H. J. Verhofstad, “Stump appendicitis after previous appendicectomy,” Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, vol. 152, no. 19, pp. 1113–1116, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. Uludag, A. Isgor, and M. Basak, “Stump appendicitis is a rare delayed complication of appendectomy: a case report,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 12, no. 33, pp. 5401–5403, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  8. B. M. Burt, P. J. Javid, and S. J. Ferzoco, “Stump appendicitis in a patient with prior appendectomy,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 2163–2164, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. J. Truty, J. M. Stulak, P. A. Utter, J. J. Solberg, and A. C. Degnim, “Appendicitis after appendectomy,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 143, no. 4, pp. 413–415, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. O. Bu-Ali, M. Al-Bashir, H. A. Samir, and F. M. Abu-Zidan, “Stump appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy: case report,” Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 267–268, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Nielsen-Breining and T. Nordentoft, “Stump appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy,” Ugeskrift for Laeger, vol. 167, no. 19, pp. 2067–2068, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  12. S. Parameshwarappa, G. Rodrigues, R. Prabhu, and C. Sambhaji, “Stump appendicitis following laparoscopic appendectomy,” Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 112–114, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  13. D. C. A. Walsh and W. E. W. Roediger, “Stump appendicitis: a potential problem after laparoscopic appendicectomy,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 357–358, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  14. S. A. Siegel, “Appendiceal stump abscess: a report of stump abscess twenty-three years postappendectomy,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 630–632, 1954. View at: Google Scholar
  15. L. O. Baumgardner, “Rupture of appendiceal stump three months after uneventful appendicectomy with repair and recovery,” Ohio State Medical Journal, vol. 45, pp. 476–477, 1949. View at: Google Scholar
  16. I. Ismail, D. Iusco, M. Jannaci et al., “Prompt recognition of stump appendicitis is important to avoid serious complications: a case report,” Cases Journal, vol. 2, no. 7, article 7415, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. E. Roberts, L. F. Starker, A. J. Duffy, and R. L. Bell, “Stump appendicitis: a surgeon's dilemma,” Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 373–378, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. G. Roche-Nagle, C. Gallagher, C. Kilgallen, and M. Caldwell, “Stump appendicitis: a rare but important entity,” Surgeon, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 53–54, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  19. D. R. Leff, M. R. Sait, M. Hanief, S. Salakianathan, A. W. Darzi, and R. Vashisht, “Inflammation of the residual appendix stump: a systematic review,” Colorectal Disease, no. 10, pp. 1463–1318, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  20. A. A. Mangi and D. L. Berger, “Stump appendicitis,” The American Surgeon, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 739–741, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  21. N. Werbin, “Unfinished surgery,” Harefuah, vol. 144, no. 12, pp. 894–908, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  22. D. P. O'Leary, E. Myers, J. Coyle, and I. Wilson, “Case report of recurrent acute appendicitis in a residual tip,” Cases Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, article 14, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. J. Rosón Rodríguez, E. Victória Toscano Castilla, J. Cotta Rebollo, M. Lozano Lanagran, and M. C. Lopez Vega, “Appendicitis of the appendicular stump: apropos of a case propósito de un caso,” Gastroenterologia y Hepatologia, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 722–723, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. K. Al-Dabbagh, N. B. Thomas, and N. Haboubi, “Stump appendicitis: a diagnostic dilemma,” Techniques in Coloproctology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 73–74, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. F. Robledo-Ogazón, L. Bojalil-Durán, A. Vargas-Rivas, L. Torres-Vieyra, and Y. Valle-Carmona, “Appendiceal stump appendicitis: case report,” Cirugia y Cirujanos, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 311–314, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  26. J. Romesburg and K. Imam, “Stump appendicitis,” Applied Radiology, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 36–38, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  27. S. Belli, C. Yalçinkaya, A. Ezer, F. Bolat, T. Çolakoǧlu, and E. Şimşek, “Stump appendicitis and chorioamnionitis due to incomplete appendectomy: a case report,” Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 540–543, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. V. Durgun, B. Baca, Y. Ersoy, and M. Kapan, “Stump appendicitis and generalized peritonitis due to incomplete appendectomy,” Techniques in Coloproctology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 102–104, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. U. De and K. De Krishna, “Stump appendicitis,” Journal of the Indian Medical Association, vol. 102, no. 6, p. 329, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  30. X. B. Tang, R. B. Qu, Y. Z. Bai, and W. L. Wang, “Stump appendicitis in children,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 233–236, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. V. Z. Erzurum, K. Kasirajan, and M. Hashmi, “Stump appendicitis: a case report,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques A, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 389–391, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  32. M. T. Aschkenasy and F. J. Rybicki, “Acute appendicitis of the appendiceal stump,” Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 41–43, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 J. A. A. Awe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

76585 Views | 1197 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.