Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Surgery
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 659270, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/659270
Case Report

Massive Submandibular Sialolith: Complete Radiographic Registration and Biochemical Analysis through X-Ray Diffraction

1Departamento de Estomatologia, Escola de Saúde e Biociências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Imaculada Conceição 1155, Prado Velho, 80215-901 Curitiba, PR, Brazil
2Laboratório de Análise de Minerais e Rochas, Departamento de Geologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Centro Politécnico 19062, Jardim das Américas, 81615-980 Curitiba, PR, Brazil

Received 26 March 2014; Accepted 26 July 2014; Published 2 September 2014

Academic Editor: David J. Bentrem

Copyright © 2014 Ademir Franco et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Sialolithiasis is a pathologic condition that affects 60 million people per year, which is caused by the presence of calcified structures, named sialoliths, inside the salivary glands and their salivary ducts. Despite the large incidence of sialolithiasis, its etiology is still unknown. In the present case report, a 47-year-old female patient, presenting with local pain and hampered mouth opening, underwent a surgical approach for the removal of a 20 mm sialolith, which was further analyzed through X-ray diffraction. In parallel, a radiographic registration of 8 years, covering all the period for sialolith formation, is presented along the case report.

1. Introduction

The salivary calculi are calcified structures often referred to as sialoliths, which consist of minerals such as calcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite, as well as other substances such as magnesium, potassium, and ammonia [1]. Sialoliths often lead to sialolithiasis, which is a common disease, affecting around 60 million people per year [1]. Mostly, sialolithiasis is clinically characterized by local pain and edema, reduced salivary flow, hampered mouth opening, spontaneous bleeding, and purulent discharge [2]. Radiographically, rounded or cylindrical radiopaque structures are observed near to the salivary glands, or their ducts, especially in panoramic and occlusal radiographs [3].

Small sialoliths can be spontaneously expelled through the stimulation of the salivary flow by performing local massage or using mechanical or chemical sialogogues, such as bubble gums and citric acid, respectively [4]. On the other hand, multiple or massive sialoliths often require major approaches, such as lithotripsy, sialadenectomy, sialotomy, and sialodochoplasty [3].

The present study aims to report the case of a 47-year-old female patient, who was diagnosed with sialolithiasis based on clinical and radiographic signs. Specifically, the present case is illustrated by a minimally invasive surgical procedure, a radiographic registration of 8 years covering the entire period of a massive sialolith formation, and a biochemical analysis through X-ray diffraction.

2. Case Report

In August 2012, a 47-year-old, white Caucasian, female patient was referred, by an orthodontist, to the Stomatology Department of the Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Brazil, presenting with extreme signs of local pain in the submandibular region and speaking limitations due to hampered mouth opening. Clinically, left submandibular lymphadenopathy was detected, as well as edema in the left side of the floor of the mouth, with a purulent discharge. In addition, a yellowish structure of hard consistency was observed near to the sublingual caruncle. An occlusal radiograph revealed a cylindrical radiopaque sialolith-compatible image, measuring approximately  cm, in the lower left canine region, confirming the diagnosis of submandibular sialolithiasis (Figure 1).

659270.fig.001
Figure 1: Occlusal radiograph of the massive sialolith (arrow).

During the anamnesis, the patient did not report systemic diseases and reported being allergic to Penicillin. Further, the surgical excision was executed in the same day due to the exacerbated symptoms and the favorable position, in which the sialolith took place after a submandibular massage. Under local anesthesia, a 5 mm incision was performed on the mucosa, over the sialolith. In order to move the sialolith close to the incision, the submandibular massage in the posteroanterior direction was repeated. Using forceps, a 20 mm sialolith (Figure 2) was removed from the floor of the mouth. After the sialolith removal, it was possible to see the reinstatement of salivary flow and also the reduction of the purulent discharge. The patient was medicated with Azithromycin 500 mg, Ibuprofen 600 mg, and Paracetamol 750 mg.

659270.fig.002
Figure 2: Clinical view of the sialolith after surgical removal.

In the following week, the patient returned without edema and local inflammation. The submandibular gland function was tested performing local massage, indicating normal salivary flow. Surprisingly, the patient provided a previous panoramic radiograph, dating from March 2011 (Figure 3), representing the last radiographic exam for conclusion of orthodontic treatment. Despite slight morphological alteration, the orthodontic radiograph allowed for the detection of the sialolith. Based on the lack of early detecting the sialolith on the orthodontic radiograph, a deeper investigation in the patient’s dental files was carried out revealing an additional panoramic radiograph, dating from June 2004, in which no sign of sialolith was detected (Figure 4). Clinical and radiographic followup were performed 6 months after the surgery revealing no alterations.

659270.fig.003
Figure 3: The last panoramic radiograph previously obtained for orthodontic purposes indicating the massive sialolith (arrow).
659270.fig.004
Figure 4: An additional panoramic radiograph retrieved from the patient’s file revealing no sign of sialolith formation.

3. Biochemical Analysis

The sialolith was referred to the Laboratory for Analysis of Minerals and Rocks, Geology Department, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Brazil (LAMIR-UFPR), for biochemical analysis through X-ray diffraction. The stone weighted 0,593 g. An Empyrean Diffractometer (PANalytical, Almelo, the Netherlands) processed the powdered sialolith. The measured scattered pattern produced out of the interaction between the X-ray beam and the sialolith surface indicated hydroxyapatite Ca5(PO4)(CO3)3(OH) as the only mineral present (Figure 5).

659270.fig.005
Figure 5: Outcome from the analysis through X-ray diffraction indicating hydroxyapatite as mineral structure of the massive sialolith.

4. Discussion

The medical literature reports the submandibular salivary glands as the most commonly related pair of glands in cases of sialolithiasis (around 80% of prevalence) [57], specially involving massive sialoliths [8]. It is explained by the submandibular salivary duct morphology, a tortuous structure which links the salivary gland to the oral cavity. The most narrowed path of the referred duct is named “comma area,” which is located near to the duct’s outfall and facilitates the deposition of minerals, such as calcium, creating a proper nidus for sialolith formation [8, 9]. In addition, the submandibular salivary gland presents an alkaline environment with high concentration of phosphate, which contributes for the formation of hydroxyapatite. In previous studies [10, 11], hydroxyapatite was detected through X-ray diffraction and classified as the main mineral structure in 24 out of 27 sialoliths. The remaining sialoliths were composed of organic structures such as epithelial cells and bacteria. Accordingly, the present study indicates that even massive sialoliths predominantly consist of hydroxyapatite. Moreover, detailed investigations indicate that levels of phytate and magnesium are decreased in patients with sialoliths [11]. Phytate and magnesium are potent crystallization inhibitors of calcium, strongly related to the daily diet, especially present in plant seeds and wheat bran, respectively. In the present study, the long-term radiographic registration suggests that the time lapse for a massive sialolith formation was less than 8 years, indicating a potential correlation with the patient’s routine diet. Thus, possible evidences for the study of the etiology of massive sialoliths are addressed. Further on, deeper investigations on the biochemical formation of sialoliths are not often performed in the daily dental practice due to the high costs and limitations in accessing necessary facilities. However, biochemical investigations are relevant to the search of potential internal and external factors associated with the sialoliths formation, such as the hormonal influence. Specifically in the present case, no especial diet or systemic alterations were reported by the patient. An additional advantage of knowing the composition of a sialolith concerns the possibility of an individualized treatment, advising the patient to avoid certain dietary components, enabling an optimal postoperative follow-up.

In the present study, as consequences of the sialolithiasis, local pain, lymphadenopathy, edema, and purulent discharge were detected. Based on these findings, the patient was medicated with antibiotics during a week. Similarly, Overton et al. [12], 2012, and Combes et al. [13], 2009, treated their patients with antibiotic therapy in the immediate postoperative week. Specifically in the preset report, considering the presence of purulent discharge and the patient’s allergy to Penicillin, Azithromycin 500 mg was prescribed for antibiotic coverage in combination with anti-inflammatory (Ibuprofen 600 mg) and analgesic (Paracetamol 750 mg) drugs.

Differently from the case reports already described in the medical literature, the present study is highlighted by the registration of the entire sialolith formation once no sign of ectopic mineralization was detected within the radiographs obtained out of the patient’s dental records. These radiographs support the need for correctly recording dental interventions and updating patient’s files, as well as early and accurately diagnosing sialolithiasis, for an optimal treatment outcome.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper. The authors are grateful to José Manoel dos Reis Neto since he passed away few months after the submission of this paper.

References

  1. M. Rai and R. Burman, “Giant submandibular sialolith of remarkable size in the comma area of Wharton’s duct: a case report,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1329–1332, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Rauso, G. Gherardini, P. Biondi, G. Tartaro, and G. Colella, “A case of a giant submandibular gland calculus perforating the floor of the mouth,” Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. E25–27, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Gonçalves, E. Hochuli-Vieira, C. Lugão, M. S. Monnazzi, and A. Gonçalves, “Sialolith of unusual size and shape,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 209–210, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. El Gehani, B. Krishnan, and M. I. L. Shehoumi, “Submandibular giant sialoliths: report of two cases and review of the literature,” Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 1–4, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Singh and S. Singh, “Submandibular gland megalith eroding the floor of the mouth: a case report,” Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 17–19, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  6. T. T. Boynton and S. E. Lieblich, “Unusual case of a sialolith: a case report,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. e9–e10, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Ardekian, H. H. Klein, S. Araydy, and F. Marchal, “The use of sialendoscopy for the treatment of multiple salivary gland stones,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 72, pp. 89–95, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Pandarakalan, W. M. Goebel, and B. Seyer, “Chronic sclerosing sialodenitis or Küttner’s tumor associated with a giant sialolith: a case report,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, vol. 115, pp. 33–40, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  9. L. Y. Zheng, E. Kim, C. Q. Yu, C. Yang, J. Park, and Z. Z. Chen, “A retrospective case series illustrating a possible association between a widened hilum and sialolith formation in the submandibular gland,” Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 648–651, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. O. Kasaboǧlu, N. Er, C. Tümer, and M. Akkocaoǧlu, “Micromorphology of sialoliths in submandibular salivary gland: a scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction analysis,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1253–1258, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. Grases, C. Santiago, B. M. Simonet, and A. Costa-Bauzá, “Sialolithiasis: mechanism of calculi formation and etiologic factors,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 334, no. 1-2, pp. 131–136, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Overton, J. Combes, and M. McGurk, “Outcome after endoscopically assisted surgical retrieval of symptomatic parotid stones,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 248–251, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Combes, K. Karavidas, and M. McGurk, “Intraoral removal of proximal submandibular stones—an alternative to sialadenectomy?” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 813–816, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus