Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Surgery
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 759316, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/759316
Case Report

Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach to Complicated Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus

1General Surgery Department, Edremit Military Hospital, Edremit, 10300 Balıkesir, Turkey
2General Surgery Department, Tuzla Hospital, Tuzla, 34944 İstanbul, Turkey
3General Surgery Department, Konya Military Hospital, 42040 Konya, Turkey
4General Surgery Department, Gulhane Military Medical Faculty, 06180 Ankara, Turkey
5General Surgery Department, Istanbul University Medical Faculty, Capa, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey

Received 3 June 2015; Revised 10 October 2015; Accepted 11 October 2015

Academic Editor: Gabriel Sandblom

Copyright © 2015 Vahit Onur Gul et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. L. Hull and J. Wu, “Pilonidal disease,” Surgical Clinics of North America, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 1169–1185, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. I. J. D. McCallum, P. M. King, and J. Bruce, “Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis,” British Medical Journal, vol. 336, no. 7649, pp. 868–871, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. G. Muzi, G. Milito, F. Cadeddu et al., “Randomized comparison of Limberg flap versus modified primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. L. Lee, T. Tejirian, and M. A. Abbas, “Current management of adolescent pilonidal disease,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1124–1127, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Doll, J. Friederichs, W. Düsel, F. Fend, and S. Petersen, “Surgery for asymptomatic pilonidal sinus disease,” International Journal of Colorectal Disease, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 839–844, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Tocchi, G. Mazzoni, M. Bononi et al., “Outcome of chronic pilonidal disease treatment after ambulatory plain midline excision and primary suture,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 196, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Qadir, A. Nazir, M. Aslam, and I. Rasool, “Primary repair without drain after limited excision of pilonidal sinus,” Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 242–245, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. O. F. Ersoy, S. Karaca, H. A. Kayaoglu, N. Ozkan, A. Celik, and T. Ozum, “Comparison of different surgical options in the treatment of pilonidal disease: retrospective analysis of 175 patients,” Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 67–70, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Soll, D. Dindo, D. Steinemann, T. Hauffe, P.-A. Clavien, and D. Hahnloser, “Sinusectomy for primary pilonidal sinus: less is more,” Surgery, vol. 150, no. 5, pp. 996–1001, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. A. Mohamed, I. Kadry, and S. Adly, “Comparison between three therapeutic modalities for non-complicated pilonidal sinus disease,” Surgeon, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 73–77, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Gips, Y. Melki, L. Salem, R. Weil, and J. Sulkes, “Minimal surgery for pilonidal disease using trephines: description of a new technique and long-term outcomes in 1,358 patients,” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1656–1662, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus