Case Reports in Surgery

Case Reports in Surgery / 2016 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 4268539 |

Gholamali Godazandeh, Farzad Mokhtari-esbuie, "Laparoscopic Repair of Morgagni Hernia: Three-Case Presentation and the Literature", Case Reports in Surgery, vol. 2016, Article ID 4268539, 4 pages, 2016.

Laparoscopic Repair of Morgagni Hernia: Three-Case Presentation and the Literature

Academic Editor: Cheng-Yu Long
Received02 Aug 2016
Accepted03 Oct 2016
Published10 Nov 2016


Introduction. Morgagni hernia is a rare form of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Case Presentation. We present three cases of Morgagni hernia with GI symptoms treated by laparoscopic surgery. Discussion. Hernial sac was excised in two cases and left in situ in one case. There was no recurrence in symptoms after 30 months from surgery.

1. Introduction

Congenital diaphragmatic hernias (CDH) are rare congenital defects. There are some different types; Bochdalek hernia, Morgagni hernia, and esophageal hiatus hernia, described with case presentations. Bochdalek hernia is the most common type of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Anteromedial or Morgagni hernia is the least common variety, accounting for only 1–3% of all diaphragmatic hernias [13]. It is caused by a defect in the retrosternal region of the diaphragm and is considered to occur due to failure of fusion in the anterior part of the pleuroperitoneal membrane and deficiency in the process of muscularization [4].

Morgagni hernia is congenital. However, there were some patients that had previous normal radiography suggesting that these hernias may be acquired through a congenital diaphragmatic defect [5].

Morgagni hernia is more common on the right side, at the level of the seventh rib on either side of the xiphoid, in a space where the superior epigastric vessels pass; defects may also occur on the left, at the midline, or bilaterally; that on the left side is referred to as Larrey hernia [6].

From one-third to more than half of patients are asymptomatic. These patients may be found incidentally when a chest X-ray undertaken for investigating unrelated problems [7].

If symptoms are present, the symptoms and signs are usually related to the size of the sac and contents in the hernial sac. The most symptoms present in these cases include nausea, vomit, recurrent chest infection, and chest pain [3, 4, 8].

Complications such as intermittent gastric volvulus, small intestine obstruction, incarceration, and strangulation of the hernia could occur. So surgical treatment is indicated in all cases of CDH even in asymptomatic patients to prevent complication [4, 9, 10].

We present three cases of Morgagni hernia repaired by laparoscopy.

2. Case Presentation

2.1. Case  1

A 75-year-old woman with vague epigastric pain one year earlier was admitted to our hospital. Her epigastric pain worsened with large solid meals. She also suffer from nausea, vomiting, and constipation. Symptoms worsened since one month prior to admission. No sweating, palpitation, dyspnea, anorexia, weight loss, dysphagia, and odynophagia were detected. A chest X-ray (CXR) revealed the presence of a mass in the proximity of the right lung.

2.2. Case  2

An 80-year-old woman came to our hospital with chief compliant of cough, dyspnea at rest, and orthopnea since two weeks before admission. She also had vomiting after heavy meals, generalized vague abdominal pain, dysphagia, regurgitation, epigastric fullness, constipation, and sweating. Clinical exam and diagnostic imaging including CXR and spiral thoracoabdominal CT scan were compatible with Morgagni hernia (Figure 1).

2.3. Case  3

An 82-year-old woman came to our hospital with chief complaint of nausea and vomiting that worsened after taking meal from 2 weeks ago. She had no epigastric pain or dysphagia or odynophagia and no weight loss was detected. She had no history of blunt trauma prior to this problem. A chest X-ray was done and showed round opacity with air-fluid level at right hemithorax on the dome of the diaphragm (Figure 2). Biochemical marker was normal. On further workup, thoracic CT scan was performed and revealed part of the colon, omentum, and stomach herniated into the thorax. When the diagnosis is confirmed, the patient was prepared for laparoscopic surgery.

After preoperative risk assessments including ECG, echocardiography, cardiologist consult, routine laboratory tests, and pulmonary function test, patients were prepared for surgical repair of the Morgagni hernia.

Patients were placed in the supine position. A Foley catheter was inserted after general anesthesia. Pneumoperitoneum with carbonic dioxide (CO2) was performed by Veress needle. One 10 mm trocar port was inserted above the umbilicus and a camera (30° angulated optic) was inserted into the abdominal cavity. Two additional trocars (5 mm) were placed at the right and the left of the abdomen, and one 10 mm trocar was placed at the left flank, respectively. Subsequently, patients were putted on the reverse Trendelenburg positions. The anesthesiologist manually inflated the lungs to ensure positive pressure in order to facilitate the reduction of the sac contents. Intraoperatively, hernial sac content (colon, omentum, and part of stomach) was pulled out and reduced back into the abdominal cavity (Figure 3). The falciform ligament was divided and the hernia sac was excised at first two cases by LigaSure (Figure 4), but at operation of the third patient, the hernial sac had not been removed. The size of the defect was 6 × 7 cm in the first patient, 5 × 6 cm in the second patient, and 6 × 6 cm in the third patient. Dual-sided mesh (15 × 20 cm) was inserted into the abdominal cavity through the 10 mm port in all three cases. Mesh was expanded over the defect and fixed to the anterior abdominal wall and edge of the diaphragmatic defect in the posterior part with spiral tacks (Protack®, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) (Figure 5). After removal of the trocars under direct visualization, the fascial incision at the 10 mm trocar sites was closed via sutures. All patients were admitted to the SICU for the first postoperative day and discharged within 48 to 72 hours after surgery. All three cases were discharged ambulatorily and putted on normal diets. There was no complication such pneumomediastinum, fluid collection, or recurrence during 20 to 30 months of follow-up for all patient.

3. Discussion

Morgagni hernia was first described by Giovanni Battista Morgagni, an Italian anatomist and pathologist in 1769, while performing a postmortem examination on a patient who died of a head injury [11, 12].

Also the etiology of CDH is unknown; however, 2% of cases have been intended to be familial and another 15% of patients have associated chromosomal abnormality. It is more common in female and obese patients. All three patients of our experience were female.

Morgagni hernias usually have a sac. It is reported that the peritoneal sac of almost all Morgagni hernias was well developed and herniated into the thoracic cavity; and the most common parts herniated into thorax are colon, omentum, stomach, liver, or other viscera [13, 14].

The most present symptoms in these cases include nausea, vomit, recurrent chest infection, and chest pain [3, 4, 8].

Cardiopulmonary symptoms such as dyspnea and palpitations are infrequent and occur less frequently than GI symptoms.

Our cases present with different symptoms. Case presented with nausea and vomiting while case 2 and case 3 presented with chest pain, cough, and dyspnea, respectively.

Differential diagnosis of this condition includes pleuropericardial cyst, pleural mesothelioma, pericardial fat pad, mediastinal lipoma, tumor or cyst of the diaphragm, thymoma, and anterior chest wall tumors [2].

The diagnosis is based on further imaging in the form of a barium study, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These kinds of imaging can define the size of the defect and contents of the hernial sac [4].

In our cases, CT scan was done for all three patients to define the diagnosis and exclude the other pathologies.

Morgagni hernia should be treated, even in asymptomatic cases. The surgery is not urgent except there is evidence of strangulation [5, 9].

Morgagni hernia can be repaired by a variety of surgical approaches including laparotomy, thoracotomy, laparoscopy, and thoracoscopy [4, 5, 15, 16].

An open transabdominal approach (laparotomy by upper midline or paramedian or subcostal incision) is the method of choice in patients with obstruction, incarceration, strangulation, or perforation. Both sides can be evaluated by a midline incision [9].

Transthoracic approach provides an excellent view for repair of the hernia. Most surgeons do not favor repair of MH by a thoracotomy due to its associated morbidity and need for chest tube drainage. Although thoracoscopic approach is a less invasive treatment, evaluation of the other side is not possible [17].

The laparoscopic approach was firstly reported by Kuster et al. in 1992 [18]. Laparoscopic repair is a safe, minimally invasive, and effective procedure and has been mentioned as the gold standard and the initial step for repair of a noncomplicated Morgagni hernia [8, 9]. Excellent bilateral view, less tissue damage, less requirement for postoperative analgesia, a short hospital stay, and rapid return to normal life are the stated benefits of laparoscopic repair for Morgagni hernia [3, 8, 19, 20].

Recently, various laparoscopic techniques have been described for repair of MH, which include a primary closure of the defect with intracorporeal sutures, stapler, or a mesh [4, 5].

However, there are some controversies regarding important aspects in the laparoscopic repair [7]. Morgagni hernias usually has a sac. It is reported that the peritoneal sac of almost all Morgagni hernias was well developed and herniated into the thoracic cavity. Excision of the hernial sac in MH remains a controversial issue. Some authors recommend excising hernial sac [4, 20, 21], whereas others prefer to leave the hernial sac in situ [2224].

Excision of the sac may have the following advantages: (1) reduction of tissue trauma because only the sac is manipulated (rather than its contents) in cases where the colon or stomach is contained within the sac; (2) decreased chance for symptomatic fluid collection since the serous lining membrane is removed; and (3) sac excision that negates the chance that the sac itself can act as a lead point for recurrent herniation [21].

In contrast, there have been concerns against removal of the sac because it may result in massive pneumomediastinum, damage to the pericardium, and mediastinal structures which are life threatening [18].

In our cases, we resected hernial sac in case 1 and case 2. There was no complication during or after surgery on follow-up. We did not remove hernia sac in case 3, but no complication such fluid collection or recurrence occur after 20 months.

4. In Conclusion

Morgagni hernia must be a differential diagnosis of persistent GI symptom. Our experience and the review of the literature indicate that laparoscopic repair of the Morgagni hernia is a safe approach. Hernial sac can be excised or left in situ.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


  1. S. Contini, R. Dalla Valle, L. Bonati, and R. Zinicola, “Laparoscopic repair of a Morgagni hernia: report of a case and review of the literature,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques—Part A, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 93–99, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. P. Comer and O. T. Clagett, “Surgical treatment of hernia of the foramen of Morgagni,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 461–468, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
  3. A. Sakoda and H. Matsufuji, “Current management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia,” Kyobu Geka, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 676–683, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  4. R. S. Shah, P. C. Sharma, and D. S. Bhandarkar, “Laparoscopic repair of Morgagni's hernia: an innovative approach,” Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 68–71, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. Kashiwagi, K. Kumagai, M. Nozue, and Y. Terada, “Morgagni hernia treated by reduced port surgery,” International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 1222–1224, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. C. Gilkeson, V. Basile, M. J. Sands, and J. T. Hsu, “Chest case of the day. Scimitar syndrome,” AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 267–270, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  7. T. P. F. Loong and H. M. Kocher, “Clinical presentation and operative repair of hernia of Morgagni,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 81, no. 951, pp. 41–44, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Li, X. Liu, Y. Shen, H. Wang, M. Feng, and L. Tan, “Laparoscopic repair of Morgagni hernia by artificial pericardium patch in an adult obese patient,” Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 754–757, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. Pironi, G. Palazzini, S. Arcieri et al., “Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of diaphragmatic Morgagni hernia. Case report and review of the literature,” Annali Italiani di Chirurgia, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  10. A. Park and C. Doyle, “Laparoscopic Morgagni hernia repair: how i do it,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1858–1862, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Garriboli, M. Bishay, E. M. Kiely et al., “Recurrence rate of Morgagni diaphragmatic hernia following laparoscopic repair,” Pediatric Surgery International, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 185–189, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. Komatsu and Y. Takahashi, “Is this a mediastinal tumor? A case of Morgagni hernia complicated with intestinal incarceration mistaken for the mediastinal lipoma previously,” International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 302–304, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. D. Horton, L. J. Hofmann, and S. P. Hetz, “Presentation and management of Morgagni hernias in adults: a review of 298 cases,” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1413–1420, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. Kaida, A. Ikeda, H. Shimoda et al., “Laparoscopic mesh repair of a Morgagni hernia using the double-crown technique: a case study,” Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 323–326, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Aydin, B. Altuntas, A. B. Ulas, C. Daharli, and A. Eroglu, “Morgagni hernia: transabdominal or transthoracic approach?” Acta Chirurgica Belgica, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 131–135, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  16. G. Godazandeh and M. Mortazian, “Laparoscopic repair of Morgagni hernia using polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mesh,” Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases, vol. 4, pp. 232–235, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  17. I. Akkoyun and M. Kececioglu, “A new, easy, and safe suturing technique for laparoscopic repair of Morgagni hernias,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1626–1628, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. G. G. R. Kuster, L. E. Kline, and G. Garzo, “Diaphragmatic hernia through the foramen of Morgagni: laparoscopic repair case report,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 93–100, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. U. Klinge, B. Klosterhalfen, A. P. Öttinger, K. Junge, and V. Schumpelick, “PVDF as a new polymer for the construction of surgical meshes,” Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 3487–3493, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. H. G. Rau, H. M. Schardey, and V. Lange, “Laparoscopic repair of a Morgagni hernia,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1439–1442, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. M. Fernandez-Cebrian and J. P. De Oteyza, “Laparoscopic repair of hernia of foramen of Morgagni: a new case report,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 61–64, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T. R. Huntington, “Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of a hernia of Morgagni,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 131–133, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Orita, M. Okino, K. Yamashita, N. Morita, and K. Esato, “Laparoscopic repair of a diaphragmatic hernia through the foramen of Morgagni,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 668–670, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. K. Jakhmola and M. V. Kumar, “Laparoscopic mesh repair of morgagni hernia in an octogenarian patient,” Medical Journal Armed Forces India, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 79–81, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Gholamali Godazandeh and Farzad Mokhtari-esbuie. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.