Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Surgery
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 3239093, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3239093
Case Report

Gossypiboma Resection after Eight Years in a Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Diabetes

1University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
2Coulee Medical Center, 411 Fortuyn Road, Grand Coulee, WA 99133, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Kenley Unruh; ude.wu@uyelnek

Received 5 July 2017; Accepted 29 August 2017; Published 3 October 2017

Academic Editor: Tahsin Colak

Copyright © 2017 Kenley Unruh and Hsien Sing Sam Hsieh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Susmallian, B. Raskin, and R. Barnea, “Surgical sponge forgotten for nine years in the abdomen: a case report,” International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, vol. 28, pp. 296–299, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Sozutek, T. Colak, E. Reyhan, O. Turkmenoglu, and E. Akpınar, “Intra-abdominal gossypiboma revisited: various clinical presentations and treatments of this potential complication,” Indian Journal of Surgery, vol. 77, pp. 1295–1300, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. Wan, T. Le, L. Riskin, and A. Macario, “Improving safety in the operating room: a systematic literature review of retained surgical sponges,” Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 207–214, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. A. Gawande, D. M. Studdert, E. J. Orav, T. A. Brennan, and M. J. Zinner, “Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348, no. 3, pp. 229–235, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Sentinel event policy and procedures, Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission, 2007.
  6. Recommended practices for sponge, sharp and instrument counts, CO: Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses, Denver, 2004.
  7. R. R. Cima, A. Kollengode, J. Garnatz, A. Storsveen, C. Weisbrod, and C. Deschamps, “Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 207, no. 1, pp. 80–87, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Devgan, H. Waters, P. J. Pronovost, and M. A. Makary, “A cost analysis of intra-operative x-ray screening for retained surgical foreign bodies,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 137, p. 186, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  9. S. E. Regenbogen, C. C. Greenberg, S. C. Resch et al., “Prevention of retained surgical sponges: A decision-analytic model predicting relative cost-effectiveness,” Surgery, vol. 145, no. 5, pp. 527–535, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. B. Duncan, M. I. Schmidt, J. S. Pankow et al., “Low-grade systemic inflammation and the development of type 2 diabetes: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study,” Diabetes, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1799–1805, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Kolb and T. Mandrup-Poulsen, “An immune origin of type 2 diabetes?” Diabetologia, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1038–1050, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. I. Schmidt, B. B. Duncan, A. R. Sharrett et al., “Markers of inflammation and prediction of diabetes mellitus in adults (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study): a cohort study,” The Lancet, vol. 353, no. 9165, pp. 1649–1652, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. S. Hotamisligil, “Inflammation and metabolic disorders,” Nature, vol. 444, no. 7121, pp. 860–867, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Yildirim, A. Tarim, T. Z. Nursal et al., “Retained surgical sponge (gossypiboma) after intraabdominal or retroperitoneal surgery: 14 cases treated at a single center,” Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, vol. 391, no. 4, pp. 390–395, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. W. Hyslop and K. I. Maull, “Natural History of the Retained Surgical Sponge,” in Proceedings of the Section on Surgery, Southern Medical Association, 75th Annual Scientific Assembly, New Orleans, LA, 1981.
  16. J. Serra, X. Matias-Gulu, R. Calabuig, P. Garcia, F. J. Sancho, and J. P. L. Calle, “Surgical gauze pseudotumor,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 235–237, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, “Revisions to the Joint Commission standards in support of patient safety and medical/healthcare error reduction,” https://www.jointcommission.org/.
  18. American Medical Association Council on Ethics and Judicial Affairs, AMA code of ethics: current opinions with annotations, The Association, Chicago, 1994.
  19. American College of Physicians, Ethics manual, The College, Philadelphia, 6 edition, 2012.
  20. C. Vincent, A. Phillips, and M. Young, “Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action,” The Lancet, vol. 343, no. 8913, pp. 1609–1613, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. O'Connell, M. K. White, and F. W. Platt, “Disclosing unanticipated outcomes and medical errors,” Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  22. A. R. Localio, A. G. Lawthers, T. A. Brennan et al., “Relation between Malpractice Claims and Adverse Events Due to Negligence,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 325, no. 4, pp. 245–251, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. T. H. Gallagher, A. D. Waterman, A. G. Ebers, V. J. Fraser, and W. Levinson, “Patients' and Physicians' Attitudes Regarding the Disclosure of Medical Errors,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 289, no. 8, pp. 1001–1007, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus