Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Surgery
Volume 2018, Article ID 1052960, 3 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1052960
Case Report

Extragastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Differential Diagnosis of Compressive Upper Abdominal Tumor

1São José do Rio Preto Medical School, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil
2Hospital de Base de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil
3Marília Medical School, Marília, SP, Brazil

Correspondence should be addressed to Clara Kimie Miyahira; moc.liamg@eimik.aralc

Received 28 September 2017; Accepted 18 February 2018; Published 9 May 2018

Academic Editor: Christine Tunon-de-Lara

Copyright © 2018 Clara Kimie Miyahira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Introduction. Extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGIST) are rare mesenchymal tumor lesions located outside the gastrointestinal tract. A rare compressing tumor with difficult diagnosis is reported. Presentation of the Case. A male patient, 63 years old, was admitted in the emergency room complaining of stretching and continuous abdominal pain for one day. He took Hyoscine, with partial improvement of symptoms, but got worse due to hyporexia, and the abdominal pain persisted. The patient also reported early satiety and ten-pound weight loss over the last month. Discussion. EGIST could be assessed by CT-guided biopsy, leading to diagnosis and proper treatment with surgical resection or Imatinib. Conclusion. This case report highlights the importance of considering EGIST an important differential diagnosis of compressing upper abdominal tumors.

1. Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare lesions in the mesenchymal neoplasm, accounting for less than 1% of the primary neoplasias of the digestive tract. They may affect any segment of the gastrointestinal tract but can occur in other locations in only 10% of the cases, and, in these situations, they are called EGIST [1]. The diagnosis is hard and may be made through CT-guided puncture and immunohistochemical analysis of the biopsy.

There are three histological types: spindle (70%), epithelial (20%), and mixed-cell. In 95%, there is somatic mutation of CD117 (c-kit), and its discovery in the immunohistochemical characteristic defines the GIST [2]. Staging could be done with abdominal and pelvis tomography, MRI, or PET-CT [3].

A case of massive EGIST is reported to show a rare differential diagnosis of an upper abdominal tumor, emphasizing the proper treatment due to correct diagnosis.

2. Presentation of the Case

A male patient, 63 years old, was admitted in the emergency room complaining of stretching and continuous abdominal pain for one day. He took Hyoscine, with partial improvement of symptoms, but got worse due to hyporexia, and the abdominal pain persisted for a few hours after medication. The patient also reported early satiety and ten-pound weight loss over the last month.

He is a smoker for nearly fifty years. He has no other comorbidities, previous surgeries, nor family history. In the physical examination, the patient showed flat abdomen, pain on superficial palpation of the epigastrium, no rebound tenderness, and palpable mass approximately 12 cm wide in the left abdominal quadrant.

The laboratory assessment was normal. An acute abdominal radiography (Figure 1) was taken, showing elevated left hemidiaphragm. The abdominal tomography (Figure 2) showed a wide hypodense mass with necrosis and heterogeneous absorption. The mass was posterior to the stomach and adjacent to the spleen and left kidney, without a cleavage plane between the left lobe of the liver and the pancreatic body, also compressing adjacent organs, invading the posterior wall of the stomach. The patient also underwent upper digestive endoscopy, showing bulging and gastric mucosal edema.

Figure 1: Acute abdominal X-ray showing the chest with elevated left hemidiaphragm.
Figure 2: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showing wide hypodense mass in the left hemiabdomen.

A CT-guided biopsy was taken, resulting in immunohistochemical analysis positive for C-Kit (Figure 3), CD34, and Ki67. These findings led to the correct diagnosis of extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST). The abdominal tomography was performed in the emergency room, also suggesting this type of tumor. The EGIST was a T4N0M0. As the tumor was greater than 2 cm and nonresectable, surgery was not suggested. The neoadjuvant therapy started with Imatinib, with weekly clinical follow-up.

Figure 3: Immunohistochemical analysis positive for CD117 (C-kit) (original magnification 40x).

3. Discussion

The EGIST is a rare diagnosis regarding stromal tumors and can affect other locations in addition to the gastrointestinal tract, such as the omentum, pancreas, rectum, and small intestine. It is an important differential diagnosis of masses in the upper abdomen: leiomyoma, leiomyosarcoma, lipoma, schwannoma, carcinoids, and fibroids. CT-guided puncture or ultrasound may provide biopsy material. The immunohistochemical analysis with CD117 (C-Kit) confirms the diagnosis [46]. A recent study showed positive immunohistochemistry in 93.3% for CD117, 70% for CD34, and 10% for S1007. The biopsy result in this case report was positive for CD117, CD34, and Ki67.

Once the diagnosis is established, it is necessary to stage the tumor for better management [7]. The study patient was staged as T4N0M0 and nonresectable. The guidelines suggest that the first-line systemic treatment for advanced GIST cases is neoadjuvant therapy with Imatinib [3, 8, 9]. This treatment may result in 83–89% of patients responding or having the progression of the disease stabilized [8].

4. Conclusion

The EGIST should be noted as an important diagnosis of tumor masses, especially when symptomatic, such as masses in the upper abdomen. The correct diagnosis is very relevant, to the extent that it outlines the choice of clinical or surgical treatment.

Abbreviations

EGIST:Extragastrointestinal stromal tumors
GIST:Gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Consent

The patient signed the written informed consent, allowing publication of this case report and any images accompanying it. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Chief Editor of this journal.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Clara Kimie Miyahira made substantial contributions to the conception and design, or data analysis and interpretation, involved in the preparation of the manuscript; Miguel Bonfitto made contributions to the data analysis and interpretation involved in the preparation of the manuscript or in the critical revision of important intellectual content; Jéssyca Fernanda de Lima Farto made substantial contributions to the design and preparation of the manuscript; Annelise de Figueiredo Calili made contributions in revising medical records and to the final revision of the case report; Nathalia Rabello da Silva Sousa was involved in the preparation of the manuscript and helped to translate the manuscript into the English language; and Ana Paula de Figueiredo Calili made contributions on data interpretation and complementary research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the patient for the authorization and the employees that supported our work at the General Surgery Department.

References

  1. J. H. Yi, B.-B. Park, J. H. Kang et al., “Retrospective analysis of extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1845–1850, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. M. Dorfman, M. M. Bui, R. R. Tubbs et al., “The CD117 immunohistochemistry tissue microarray survey for quality assurance and interlaboratory comparison - a College of American Pathologists Cell Markers Committee Study,” Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 779–782, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, “Soft tissue sarcoma, version 2.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology,” http://www.jnccn.org/content/14/6/758.full.
  4. M. Miettinen, W. El-Rifai, L. Sobin, and J. Lasota, “Evaluation of malignancy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review,” Human Pathology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 478–483, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Shinomura, K. Kinoshita, S. Tsutsui, and S. Hirota, “Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 775–780, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. Watal, S. G. Brahmbhatt, P. J. Thoriya, and N. U. Bahri, “Retroperitoneal extragastrointestinal stromal tumor: radiologic pathologic correlation,” Journal of Clinical Imaging Science, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 34, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. Quezada, F. Acevedo, A. Marambio et al., “Complete pathological response to Imatinib mesylate in an extraintestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumor,” International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 681–685, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. Joensuu, P. Hohenberger, and C. L. Corless, “Gastrointestinal stromal tumour,” The Lancet, vol. 382, no. 9896, pp. 973–983, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. P. Rubin, “Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: an update,” Histopathology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 83–96, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus