Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Surgery
Volume 2018, Article ID 9628742, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9628742
Case Report

Effect of 4DryField® PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Unna, Holbeinstr. 10, 59423 Unna, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Gerhard Blumhardt; ed.enilno-t@tdrahmulb

Received 15 December 2017; Accepted 28 January 2018; Published 11 March 2018

Academic Editor: Boris Kirshtein

Copyright © 2018 Gerhard Blumhardt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. W. Vrijland, J. Jeekel, H. J. van Geldorp, D. J. Swank, and H. J. Bonjer, “Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1017–1022, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. A. Weibel and G. Majno, “Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery: a postmortem study,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 345–353, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Menzies and H. Ellis, “Intestinal obstruction from adhesions—how big is the problem?” Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 60–63, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  4. Operative Laparoscopy Study Group, “Postoperative adhesion development after operative laparoscopy: evaluation at early second-look procedures. Operative Laparoscopy Study Group,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 700–704, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  5. M. P. Diamond and M. L. Freeman, “Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 567–576, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Menzies, “Postoperative adhesions-their treatment and relevance in clinical practice,” Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 75, pp. 147–153, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  7. D. E. Beck, F. G. Opelka, H. R. Bailey, S. M. Rauh, and C. L. Pashos, “Incidence of small-bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgery,” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 241–248, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Holmdahl and B. Risberg, “Adhesions: prevention and complications in general surgery,” European Journal of Surgery, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 169–174, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  9. K. H. Treutner, P. Bertram, G. Lätzsch, and V. Schumpelick, “Causes of intestinal obstruction—a retrospective study of 550 surgical cases,” in Peritoneal Adhesions, K.-H. Treutner and V. Schumpelick, Eds., pp. 191–194, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. P. Diamond, “Incidence of postsurgical adhesions,” in Peritoneal Surgery, G. Dizerega, Ed., pp. 217–220, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. P. Diamond, J. F. Daniell, J. Feste et al., “Adhesion reformation and de novo adhesion formation after reproductive pelvic surgery,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 864–866, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Korell, “Methods of adhesion prophylaxis-pros and cons,” Journal für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 6–13, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  13. N. F. Ray, W. G. Denton, M. Thamer, S. C. Henderson, and S. Perry, “Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 186, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. Tingstedt, J. Isaksson, and R. Andersson, “Long-term follow-up and cost analysis following surgery for small bowel obstruction caused by intra-abdominal adhesions,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 743–748, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. Ahmad, H. O’Flynn, A. Hindocha, and A. Watson, “Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 4, p. CD000475, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  16. D. E. Beck, Z. Cohen, J. W. Fleshman, H. S. Kaufman, H. van Goor, and B. G. Wolff, “A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine,” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1310–1319, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. J. Felton, D. W. Tuggle, A. L. Milewicz et al., “High mortality with an intraperitoneal antiadhesive in the rat,” Current Surgery, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 444–446, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  18. A. Uzunköy, O. F. Akinci, A. Coskun, O. Aslan, and A. Kocyigit, “Effects of antiadhesive agents on the healing of intestinal anastomosis,” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 370–375, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. Poehnert, M. Abbas, H. H. Kreipe, J. Klempnauer, and M. Winny, “Evaluation of 4DryField® PH as adhesion prevention barrier tested in an optimized adhesion model (OPAM) in rats,” European Surgical Research, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 341–351, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Poehnert, L. Grethe, L. Maegel et al., “Evaluation of the effectiveness of peritoneal adhesion prevention devices in a rat model,” International Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 524–532, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Winny, L. Maegel, L. Grethe et al., “Adhesion prevention efficacy of composite meshes Parietex®, Proceed® and 4DryField® PH covered polypropylene meshes in an IPOM rat model,” International Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 936–941, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Korell, “Combined hemostasis and adhesion prevention with the novel agent 4DryField® PH—initial observations,” Surgical Science, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 533–539, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Korell, N. Ziegler, and R. L. De Wilde, “Use of modified polysaccharide 4DryField® PH for adhesion prevention and hemostasis in gynecological surgery: a two-center observational study by second-look laparoscopy,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 3029264, 9 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Winny, L. Maegel, L. V. Grethe et al., “Treatment of de-peritonealized intestine with 4DryField® PH prevents adhesions between non-resorbable intra-peritoneal hernia mesh and bowel,” American Journal of Translational Research, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 5706–5714, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  25. E. S. Han, S. A. Scheib, K. E. Patzkowsky, K. Simpson, and K. C. Wang, “The sticky business of adhesion prevention in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 266–275, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. K. Pujahari, “Decision making in bowel obstruction: a review,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. PE07–PE12, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  27. W. Arung, M. Meurisse, and O. Detry, “Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 17, no. 41, pp. 4545–4553, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. T. Fevang, D. Jensen, K. Svanes, and A. Viste, “Early operation or conservative management of patients with small bowel obstruction?” European Journal of Surgery, vol. 168, no. 8-9, pp. 475–481, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. P. Meier, W. O. de Saussure, L. A. Orci et al., “Clinical outcome in acute small bowel obstruction after surgical or conservative management,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 3082–3088, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. H. Barkan, S. Webster, and S. Ozeran, “Factors predicting the recurrence of adhesive small-bowel obstruction,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 170, no. 4, pp. 361–365, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. Brüggmann, G. Tchartchian, M. Wallwiener, K. Münstedt, H. R. Tinneberg, and A. Hackethal, “Intra-abdominal adhesions: definition, origin, significance in surgical practice, and treatment options,” Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, vol. 107, no. 44, pp. 769–775, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. Ellis, W. Harrison, and T. B. Hugh, “The healing of peritoneum under normal and pathological conditions,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 52, pp. 471–476, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus