Case Reports in Transplantation

Case Reports in Transplantation / 2017 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 8286257 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8286257

R. C. Minnee, H. J. A. N. Kimenai, J. van de Wetering, J. N. M. Ijzermans, "Successful Use of Ectopic Pelvic Kidney for Living Related Donation Technical Aspects and Literature Review", Case Reports in Transplantation, vol. 2017, Article ID 8286257, 5 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8286257

Successful Use of Ectopic Pelvic Kidney for Living Related Donation Technical Aspects and Literature Review

Academic Editor: David Conti
Received23 Mar 2017
Accepted10 May 2017
Published04 Jun 2017

Abstract

Ectopic pelvic kidneys can provide an additional source of organs for transplantation. They are often excluded from donation in living donation programs mainly due to aberrant vascular and urinary anatomies. We present a donor with an ectopic left kidney, who successfully donated his kidney. The use of ectopic pelvic kidney for living kidney transplantation is a highly demanding surgical procedure but after extensive preoperative investigation in high volume centers with surgical expertise in vascular reconstruction and access surgery, ectopic pelvic kidneys should not be a contraindication for donation and should be considered as a viable option.

1. Introduction

Live donor kidney transplantation is the optimal method of renal replacement therapy for most patients with end stage renal disease in terms of short- and long-term results [1]. Shortage of available donor kidneys compels us to expand the supply of living donor kidneys. Essentially, the donor kidney must be anatomically and functionally suitable for transplantation, and the donor must be in good medical and psychological health and left with a good renal function from the remaining kidney.

The use of ectopic pelvic kidneys can provide an additional source of organs for transplantation.

Ectopic pelvic kidney is a relatively rare congenital anomaly in which the kidney fails to ascend to its lumbar position during embryonic development. The incidence of pelvic kidneys is reported as 1 in 1000 autopsies; only routine ultrasound screening in children revealed a lower incidence of 1 in 5000 [2, 3]. The location of an ectopic kidney can be pelvic, lumbar, abdominal, and thoracic or crossed fused. Ectopic pelvic kidney slightly occurs more on the left side with predominance in male subjects. Due to malrotation, the ectopic pelvic kidney might have a flattened, discoid shape. This incomplete rotation leads to an undeveloped renal pelvis with a variety of congenital anatomies such as a shorter ureter, defective ureteral drainage, and multiple renal arteries and renal veins. Ectopic pelvic kidneys are often excluded from donation in living donation programs mainly due to these aberrant vascular and urinary anatomies resulting in only a few successful case reports [415]. We advocate the use of these kidneys for transplantation in high volume transplant centers and present a successful living-unrelated kidney transplantation of an ectopic pelvic kidney; in addition, we present a review of the literature to focus on the technical aspects.

2. Case Report

The donor was a 43-year-old man donating a kidney to his wife. In the past, he underwent arthroscopic meniscus repair on his left knee and micro discectomy of a herniated nucleus pulposus. He did not use any medication and reported no allergies. During workup, an ectopic left kidney and a normally placed right kidney were found. Physical examination was normal with a BMI of 25.7. Blood and urine examination revealed no abnormalities. His measured creatinine clearance was 123 mL/min. The computed tomography (CT) angiogram performed showed 1 artery, 1 vein, and 1 ureter of the left kidney (Figures 1 and 2). The ectopic left kidney had a relative function of 40% in conventional technetium-99m (Tc-99m) mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) scan. During the renal transplant multidisciplinary meeting, it was recommended to select the left kidney for donation.

A left open donor nephrectomy was performed through a Gibson incision. The donor kidney had additional blood vessels undetected on CT scan. There were an additional upper polar artery and an additional middle polar artery (Figure 3). On the bench, an end-to-side anastomosis was made between the middle polar artery and the main renal artery with Prolene 7.0 (Figure 4).

The recipient was the donor’s 43-year-old wife with end stage renal failure secondary to tubulointerstitial nephritis. The donor kidney was placed in the right iliac fossa. The renal vein was anastomosed to the common iliac vein, whereas the reconstructed renal artery was anastomosed end to side to the external iliac artery and the upper polar artery to the common iliac artery. The anastomosis time for all anastomoses was 32 minutes. The method used to establish urinary continuity was extravesical ureteroneocystostomy and closure of the abdominal wall in layers. The ureteroneocystostomy was stented with an externally draining 8-French catheter for 9 days. According to local protocol, a standard dose of 12.000 U heparin daily was given during the first 5 days due to the arterial reconstruction. The postoperative course of the donor and the patient was uneventful.

3. Discussion

The use of an ectopic kidney for transplantation in a living transplant program has been only reported in thirteen patients (Table 1) [415]. In all cases, extensive investigation of live donors was carried out. The majority of ectopic kidneys had multiple renal vessels especially renal arteries (77%). However, despite comprehensive investigation in 4 cases (29%) (including our case), discrepancy was found between the preoperative imaging and operative findings [4, 11, 14]. In all 4 cases, additional renal veins and/or arteries were visualized. So, even after extensive preoperative imaging, a cautious approach should be undertaken during the donor nephrectomy for the existence of additional vascular structures.


AuthorNumber of patientsDonor-recipient relationshipKidneyNumber of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Discrepancy imaging versus surgery

Kim 19731Sister to brotherLeft111111N
Spanos 19762Mother to sonRight311311N
Brother to brotherRight211211N
Bacharach 19841Brother to brotherRight211311Y
Luke 20031Uncle to nieceLeft221221N
Grogan 20041Son to motherRight111111N
Boughey 20041Father to sonRight311321Y
Li 20061UnrelatedRight331331N
Papanikolaou 20071Mother to sonLeft111111N
Goldsmith 20091Father to sonLeft211321Y
He 20121Wife to husbandLeft221221N
Yaich 20141Son to fatherLeft311311N
Siemens 20151Father to sonLeft211211N

of arteries/veins and ureters on preoperative imaging; of arteries/veins and ureters during explantation.

Several studies reported clinicoradiological discrepancies between preoperative CT renal angiography and operative findings ranging from 5% to 15% [1618]. Retrospectively, Johnson et al. could not identify 3 of the 12 discrepancies between CT angiographic and operative findings on image review [16]. This reveals an effect of experience on reporting accuracy and greater awareness of potential reporting pitfalls, which was the case in our report.

All kidney grafts showed immediate graft function except in one case requiring two hemodialysis sessions (Table 2). All arterial and venous reconstructions were flawless, showing that reconstruction of multiple renal vessels in ectopic pelvic kidneys is feasible for transplantation [4, 11, 1315].


AuthorNumber of patientsATVascular reconstructionVascular reconstructionPostoperative courseGraft function

Kim 19731N/ANUneventfulImmediate
Spanos 19762N/AN2 arteries ETS, smallest on internal iliac arteryUneventfulImmediate
N/ANNo reconstruction, smallest artery ligatedUneventfulImmediate
Bacharach 19841N/AY2 arteries STS, smallest artery ligatedUneventfulImmediate
Luke 2003132 minY2 arteries STS, 2 renal veins ETSUneventfulImmediate
Grogan 20041N/ANUneventfulImmediate
Boughey 20041N/AY2 arteries STS, 2 renal veins ETSUneventfulImmediate
Li 20061N/AY2 arteries STS, smallest on internal iliac artery, 3 renal veins reconstructed with vein interponateUneventfulImmediate
Papanikolaou 20071N/ANUneventfulImmediate
Goldsmith 2009150 minY2 arteries ETS, 1 artery ETE on epigastric artery with vein interponate, 2 renal veins ETSUneventfulImmediate
He 2012145 minN1 artery ETS, 1 artery ETE on internal iliac artery, 2 renal veins ETSUneventful, 6 weeks later lymphocele followed by surgeryImmediate
Yaich 20141N/AN1 artery ETS, 2 small arteries ligatedUneventfulImmediate
Siemens 20151N/AN2 arteries ETSAcute vascular rejection2 HD sessions

N/A: not applicable; ETS: end-to-site anastomosis; STS: side-to-side anastomosis; ETE: end-to-end anastomosis; AT: anastomosis time.

Ureteral duplication occurs in approximately 0.8% of the general population and the incidence of duplicated ureters in ectopic pelvic kidney is unknown [19]. Approximately 50% of ectopic kidneys have a hydronephrosis. Half of these cases are due to obstruction of the ureteropelvic or the ureterovesical junction (70% and 30%, resp.), 25% from reflux grade III or greater, and 25% from the malrotation alone [20]. Despite all aberrant urinary anatomies described in the literature, all transplanted ectopic pelvic kidneys reported in the literature had a normal single ureter and urinary collecting system. When the ureter is very short, ureteroureterostomy or pyelovesicostomy is an alternative option.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has been performed in 2 cases [8, 12]. Key points for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy are careful interpretation of the preoperative imaging and use of a Endo Retract™ articulating fan retractor to increase the working space [12].

Hence, these donors should have extensive investigations of the renal vasculature and anatomy variation using computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography. Intravenous pyelography can also be performed to detect urinary tract abnormality and, additionally, nuclear renography is necessary to assess the renal function of each kidney.

The main limitation in all the case reports is the presence of publication bias. Only successful transplantations are most likely reported and published.

The use of ectopic pelvic kidney for living kidney transplantation is a highly demanding surgical procedure but nonetheless a feasible one. After extensive preoperative investigation in high volume centers with surgical expertise in vascular reconstruction and access surgery, ectopic pelvic kidneys should not be a contraindication for donation and should be considered as a viable option. Since the presence of an ectopic pelvic kidney is a relatively common condition, it must be noted that the use of these kidneys may expand the donor pool in experienced hands.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. C. L. Davis and F. L. Delmonico, “Living-donor kidney transplantation: A review of the current practices for the live donor,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 2098–2110, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. P. Dretler, C. Olsson, and R. C. Pfister, “The anatomic, radiologic and clinical characteristics of the pelvic kidney: an analysis of 86 cases,” Journal of Urology, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 623–627, 1971. View at: Google Scholar
  3. C. P. Sheih et al., “Renal abnormalities in schoolchildren,” Pediatrics, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1086–1090, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  4. M. D. Bacharach and N. L. Tilney, “Use of an ectopic pelvic donor kidney for transplantation,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1663–1665, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  5. E. L. Grogan, W. A. Nylander, and D. Shaffer, “Living-related transplantation of an ectopic pelvic kidney [3],” Transplantation, vol. 77, no. 6, p. 953, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. H. Kim and O. Fjeldborg, “Transplantation of pelvic kidney: A case report,” Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, vol. 7, no. 2-3, pp. 236–238, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. V. Papanikolaou, D. Giakoustidis, N. Antoniadis, N. Ouzounidis, D. Takoudas, and A. Antoniadis, “Living-related transplantation of an ectopic pelvic kidney,” International Journal of Urology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 357–359, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. A. Siemens et al., “Pelvic kidney for living transplantation: case report and review of the literature,” Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 418–421, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. K. Spanos, R. Weil, R. L. Simmons, and J. S. Najarian, “Successful transplantation of ectopic kidneys from living related donors,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 360–362, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Yaich et al., “Use of a pelvic kidney for living transplantation,” Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 408-409, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. C. Boughey, O. E. Emovon, F. Afzal et al., “Living donor transplantation of a pelvic kidney,” Clinical Transplantation, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 336–338, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. B. He and A. Mitchell, “Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for ectopic kidney,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3051–3054, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Li, S. Nadalin, A. Paul et al., “The symptomatic pelvic kidney: A new source of organs for living donor kidney transplantation?” Transplantation, vol. 82, no. 9, pp. 1241-1242, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. J. Goldsmith, M. Marco, Z. Hussain, C. Newstead, J. P. A. Lodge, and N. Ahmad, “Kidney Transplantation Using the Inferior Epigastric Vessels for Multiple Anastomoses from a Pelvic Kidney,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 209, no. 1, p. -e3, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. P. W. Luke, V. C. McAlister, A. M. Jevnikar et al., “Use of a pelvic kidney for living transplantation: Case report and review of the literature,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 235–238, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. E. Johnson, E. J. Loveday, L. J. Archer, P. Lear, and M. J. Thornton, “Preoperative evaluation of live renal donors using multislice CT angiography,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 771–777, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. F. Platt, J. H. Ellis, M. Korobkin, and K. Reige, “Helical CT evaluation of potential kidney donors: Findings in 154 subjects,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 169, no. 5, pp. 1325–1330, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. J. Del Pizzo, G. N. Sklar, J. W. You-Cheong, B. Levin, T. Krebs, and S. C. Jacobs, “Helical computerized tomography arteriography for evaluation of live renal donors undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy,” Journal of Urology, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 31–34, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. T. J. Privett, W. D. Jeans, and J. Roylance, “The incidence and importance of renal duplication,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 521–530, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. C. J. Shapiro E, “Anomalies of the upper urinary tract,” in Campbell-Walsh Urology, pp. 3123–3160, Elsevier, 2011. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 R. C. Minnee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views815
Downloads309
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.