Emerging of Fatal Colitis with Multidrug-Resistant <i>Candida glabrata</i> after Small Bowel Transplantation

Zareshahrabadi, Zahra; Shafiekhani, Mojtaba; Nikoupour, Hamed; Nouraei, Hasti; Morovati, Hamid; Zomorodian, Kamiar

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9995583

Case Reports in Transplantation

On this page

Abstract Background Case Report Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 9995583 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9995583

Emerging of Fatal Colitis with Multidrug-Resistant Candida glabrata after Small Bowel Transplantation

Zahra Zareshahrabadi,¹Mojtaba Shafiekhani,²Hamed Nikoupour,²Hasti Nouraei,¹Hamid Morovati,¹and Kamiar Zomorodian^1,3

Academic Editor: Piero Boraschi

Received15 Mar 2021

Accepted09 Aug 2021

Published10 Sept 2021

Abstract

Background. Small bowel transplantation is a potential option for patients with intestinal-failure, and the incidences of infections caused by Candida species that are more resistant to antifungal drugs are increasing in these patients. In this manuscript, we reported a case of fatal colitis after small bowel transplantation induces by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Candida glabrata. Case Presentation. A 52-year-old man has undergone an extensive small bowel resection with the length of the remaining bowel which was less than 40 cm who became a candidate for transplantation. Four months after transplantation, the patient experienced severe bloody diarrhea with abdominal distension. Ileoscopy and colonoscopy did not show neither pathological change and rejection nor cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection posttransplantation. Abdomen computed tomography showed diffuse moderate small bowel wall thickening. After detection of budding yeast in the stool samples, stool culture was positive for Candida, DNA was extracted, and ITS1-5.8s-ITS2 region of the fungal agent was amplified. Sequencing analysis of PCR and antifungal susceptibility testing revealed that this isolate was multidrug-resistant C. glabrata. Besides, there was no evidence for other pathogens known to cause infection in various laboratory tests. Immediate antifungal treatments with caspofungin remained unsuccessful, and on the eighteenth day of admission, the patient expires with septic shock. Conclusion. These findings highlight the challenging management of candidiasis in patients with small bowel transplantation. Infectious diseases due to MDR organisms have emerged as a vital clinical problem in this patient population.

1. Background

Infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. The bacterial followed by viral and fungal infections are the predominant infections which following in SOT [1]. Although fungal infections have remained an encountered challenge among SOT recipients, information on the epidemiology of these infections has been limited mostly to single-center and retrospective studies. The incidence of invasive fungal infection (IFI) among 16,808 SOT patients included in the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network was estimated at 3.1% [2]. The most common sites of infection are the bloodstream, intra-abdominal, and urinary tract [3]. The incidence of IFI was variable based on the graft type with the highest incidence in small bowel transplant recipients (11.6%) and lowest in kidney transplant recipients (1.3%) [2, 4]. The majority of intra-abdominal fungal infections (40%) are diagnosed in the first month after transplantation, most likely due to the associated disease leading to transplantation, surgical procedure contamination, and loss of the mucosal integrity of intestine during recovery, preservation, and transplantation [5, 6]. In the first 3 months after transplantation, invasive candidiasis as a classic nosocomial infection occurs earlier than other invasive mycoses [7]. Overall, Candida spp. are the most common type of fungal infections among SOT recipients except for lung transplant recipients in which Aspergillus is more prevalent [2, 8]. Whereas Candida albicans has been the most common species isolated from IFIs, there is a steady increase in fungal infections caused by non-albicans Candida species [8, 9]. Among the non-albicans Candida species, C. glabrata is the most common non-albicans isolate. The emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida glabrata, during prolonged and more broad-spectrum exposure to antifungal agents have created a therapeutic challenge [10]. In this manuscript, we reported fatal severe colitis after isolated small bowel transplantation induces by MDR C. glabrata.

2. Case Report

2.1. History of the Recipient

A 52-year-old man, who developed acute mesenteric ischemia, had undergone an extensive bowel resection. The length of the remaining small bowel was less than 40 cm and accounted as ultrashort bowel syndrome and referred to our center due to evaluation of the possibility of isolated small bowel transplantation (ISTx). He received total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for 18 months and then received a small bowel transplant from donor (14 years brain-dead) with ABO and HLA typing compatible. The patient received methylprednisolone (1 g/day, 4 doses) and thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg/day, 4 days) as induction immunosuppressant and then received mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and prednisolone as maintenance immunosuppressive regimen. Piperacillin-tazobactam (4.5 g q8h for 3 days), vancomycin (1 g q12h for 3 days), and caspofungin (50 mg daily for 2 weeks) started after transplantation as prophylactic antibacterial and antifungal, respectively. He received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and valganciclovir for Pneumocystis jiroveci and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis, respectively, for the first 6 months after ISTx. The patient was discharged from the hospital after 1 month, and then, outpatient visits were performed in the transplant clinic by transplant surgeons, weekly. Four months after transplantation, the patient experienced severe bloody diarrhea with abdominal distension for three consecutive days. Then, the patient came to the Emergency Rooms (ERs) by ambulance in the hypovolemic shock state with drowsiness. Vital signs on arrival were the temperature of 38°C, blood pressure of 82/57 mmHg, pulse rate of 101/min, and respiratory rate of 24/min (Table 1).

The patient was resuscitated with 2 liters of normal saline and transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) for further evaluation and treatment. On the second day of admission, the patient was intubated, all immunosuppressive was discontinued, inotropes with broad-spectrum antibiotics were started, and sepsis workups were done. The patient underwent diagnostic ileoscopy and colonoscopy. Tissue biopsies did not show neither pathological change and rejection nor CMV organ involvement. Abdomen computed tomography showed diffuse moderate small bowel wall thickening. Stool examination and cultures were analyzed for evaluating infectious causes. Due to colonoscopy features which illustrated diffuse scattered whitish cobblestoning picture (Figure 1) with suspicion of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), detection of fecal toxin A/B by enzyme immunoassay (CDIFF TOX A/B II; TechLab/Wampole, Blacksburg, VA, USA) and culture (CLO agar; bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France) were done. All blood, urine, and sputum cultures were negative. Metronidazole plus oral vancomycin were added to his antibiotic regimen to cover suspicious CDI. After detection of budding yeast in the stool samples, caspofungin was started, and more evaluation regarding fungal infection, especially Candida spp., was done as below. Stool culture was positive for C. glabrata with antifungal susceptibility profiles which are showed in Table 2. On the eleventh day of admission, due to a significant deterioration in the clinical condition and severe abdominal distention, the patient underwent emergency abdominal exploration and total colectomy. Finally, on the eighteenth day of admission, the patient expires with septic shock.

2.2. Candida Culture and Slide Smear

The stool sample was diluted 1 : 10 with saline, and 100 microliters of dilution was transferred onto a Candida CHROMagar (Merck, Germany) and was plated evenly with a sterile swab. After incubation at 37°C for 48 h in ambient air, the Candida colonies were counted and classified as C. glabrata, according to the color of the colonies. It is notable that a colony stool was classified as “Candida overgrowth,” according to Krause et al. [11]. In addition, stool sample was examined by light microscopy for the presence of yeasts.

2.3. Molecular Evaluation

Molecular evaluation of the Candida sp. isolated from the stool sample was performed for the identification of fungal agents. DNA extraction was performed by the boiling lysis method. Single Candida colony from a pure fresh Sabouraud dextrose agar (Merck, Germany) plate was picked and inoculated into 200 μl of sterile Milli-Q water and kept for 10 min in a heat block (Rivotek, India) at 100°C. The extracted DNA after incubation at 100°C was kept in a −20°C deep freezer for 10 min and then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The extracted DNA was stored at -20°C for PCR assay. Amplification of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region was done by universal primers ITS1 (5-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG 92G-3) and ITS4 (5-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3) at the annealing temperature of 56°C. The amplification was done for 35 cycles of 98°C for 30 s and annealing temperatures of 60°C and 72°C both for 30 s. This was followed by a final extension of 72°C for 5 min. The nucleic acid sequences were compared with the database at the GenBank database using the BLAST sequence search tool. The comparative DNA sequence analysis by nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) revealed that the amplified sequence was identified as C. glabrata. Molecular identification was consistent with culture methods.

2.4. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

The broth microdilution method (CLSI M27-A3/S4) was used for susceptibility testing of our isolate to the following antifungal drugs: fluconazole (FLZ), itraconazole (ITZ), amphotericin B (AMB), caspofungin (CAS) (all from Sigma Chemical Corporation, St. Louis, MO, USA), and voriconazole (VRZ; Pfizer, New York, NY, USA). C. glabrata isolate was seeded on the plate containing antifungal drugs, incubated at 37°C for 24 h, and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by visual examination based on clinical breakpoints or epidemiological cutoff values, which differ across species and the antifungal used. Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22 019) and C. krusei (ATCC 6258) were used as references for quality control. Antifungal susceptibility testing found that the C. glabrata sample was resistant to FLZ, VRZ, and ITZ, likely resistant to AMB and CAS (Table 2).

3. Discussion

Invasive fungal infections are a major problem in SOT recipients. Overall, the most common fungal infection in SOT is candidiasis, followed by aspergillosis and cryptococcosis [4, 12, 13]. Over the last twenty years, intestinal transplantation has been performed for the treatment of patients with intestinal failure and the incidence of fungal infections is higher among patients receiving ISTx than other SOTs because these patients have a central catheter for a long time to receive total parenteral nutrition and broad-spectrum antibiotics and also due to loss of intestinal mucosal integrity during recovery, preservation, and transplantation [12, 14]. In addition, they are susceptible to an intra-abdominal abscesses or intestinal leaks [15]. Invasive fungal infections have been reported in 25.5–59% of the intestinal transplantation recipients [5, 12]. Candidiasis as the most cases of nosocomial infection in intestinal transplantation recipients Candida spp. is the most common cause of infection among intestinal transplant patients, which has a role of non-C. albicans spp., including C. glabrata which is higher than other species of Candida genus. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first case report of severe fetal colitis by C. glabrata after ISTx [5, 13]. In general, in patients with small bowel transplantation, in the case of gastrointestinal complication symptoms, especially diarrhea, the first issue that is considered is graft rejection and then CMV infection [5]. Therefore, the occurrence of fungal infections is less considered, which leads to losing the appropriate time to initiate antifungal therapy. Hence, immunosuppressed patients may not show the usual and classic symptoms of fungal infections, so it is necessary to evaluate more carefully in this regard. Arfa et al. revealed that microbial infection was the second common reason for graft failure, after rejection, and they showed in their study that 31% of the patients had a fungal infection, including 64.7% aspergillosis, 17.6% candidiasis, and 17.6% Pseudallescheria boydii infection [17]. It is notable that clinical involvement of different species of Candida is not similar to each other, so that in our patient who was infected with C. glabrata in line with Praneenararat study [16] that reported colitis with C. tropicalis agent, dysentery and fever were the early symptoms, while according to the Arfa et al. study [17], colitis with C. krusei, fever, and abdominal pain symptoms did not occur, and colitis with diarrhea was the only clinical symptom. In the current case, in addition to the mentioned symptoms, the colonoscopic view was very similar to that of CDI. In SOT transplant recipients, antifungal prophylaxis is usually administered at least for 4 weeks, until anastomosis has entirely healed and resolution of risk factors. Prophylaxis strategies are increasingly used in immunocompromised patients due to the potentially devastating effect of invasive candidiasis in terms of morbidity and mortality. The ideal agent is unclear, but FLZ, CAS, and AMB drugs are logical options [18–20]. Recently, the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) updated antifungal susceptibility break points for Candida spp. [21]. Echinocandin class (ECH) drugs, which inhibit the synthesis of β-glucan and disrupt in cell wall integrity, are the first line antifungal therapy against C. glabrata infections, as this species has low susceptibility to azole drugs, hereditary [22]. Importantly, resistance to ECH class of antifungal drugs was associated with cross-resistance to azole class in 36% of the cases [14, 23–25] as well as in the current case report study, so that concerns regarding MDR C. glabrata significantly increased. The increasing numeral of C. glabrata clinical isolates reported showing decreased susceptibility for echinocandins is an emergent concern. According to the previous studies, rates of CAS resistance among C. glabrata clinical isolates range from <10% [26] to as high as 62% [27]. Based on the past studies, one possible reason for the increased resistance of C. glabrata to the CAS is exposure to low CAS concentrations so that C. glabrata is able to colonize and survive in internal parts of the human body, such as the abdomen [28], the peritoneum [29], the gastrointestinal tract [30], or the mucosal surfaces [31], due to long-term penetration of CAS in lower concentrations than those that prevent resistance acquisition. The use of newly developed antifungal drugs that target the 1–3-β-D-glucan synthase, such as ibrexafungerp, which has shown potential effectiveness against ECH-resistant C. glabrata isolates [32], or rezafungin, which has an extended interval administration due to its improved pharmacodynamics [33], could help to overcome ECH resistance. In our center for patients who undergo a small bowel transplant as long as the patient is NPO, CAS and then FLZ are used for 4 weeks as antifungal prophylaxis. Considering that long-term use of azoles can cause resistance in Candida species and, on the other hand, according to the drug resistance pattern reported in this study, it is necessary to reconsider the use of FLZ as part of the prophylaxis regimen.

4. Conclusion

In summary, we presented a case of candidiasis with C. glabrata agent as the most reported MDR Candida spp. in a patient undergoing a small bowel transplant by conventional and molecular analysis. In this study, the triazoles, polyene, and echinocandin classes of antifungal drugs appear to be inactive against C. glabrata with high MICs. Further attention is recommended to control fungal pathogens during organ transplantation.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study were supplied by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences under license and so cannot be made freely available. Requests for access to these data should be made to Kamiar Zomorodian, [email protected] or [email protected].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

D. Wu, C. Chen, T. Liu, Y. Jia, Q. Wan, and J. Peng, “Epidemiology, susceptibility, and risk factors associated with mortality in carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections among abdominal solid organ transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study,” Infectious Diseases and Therapy, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 559–573, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. G. Pappas, B. D. Alexander, D. R. Andes et al., “Invasive fungal infections among organ transplant recipients: results of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET),” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1101–1111, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Silveira, S. Kusne, and the AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice, “CandidaInfections in solid organ transplantation,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 13, no. s4, pp. 220–227, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Hosseini-Moghaddam, A. Ouédraogo, K. L. Naylor et al., “Incidence and outcomes of invasive fungal infection among solid organ transplant recipients: a population-based cohort study,” Transplant Infectious Disease, vol. 22, no. 2, article e13250, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Gavaldà, Y. Meije, J. Fortún et al., “Invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 20, pp. 27–48, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Guyton and J. C. Alverdy, “The gut microbiota and gastrointestinal surgery,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 43–54, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Kabir, J. Maertens, and D. Kuypers, “Fungal infections in solid organ transplantation: an update on diagnosis and treatment,” Transplantation Reviews, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 77–86, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Nouraei, S. Sheykhi, Z. ZareShahrabadi, H. Khodadadi, K. Zomorodian, and K. Pakshir, “Comparative analysis of virulence factors of homozygous and heterozygous strains of Candida albicans vaginal isolates,” International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2020, Article ID 8889224, 5 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zareshahrabadi, K. Zomorodian, K. Pakshir et al., “Morphogenesis and pathogenesis regulation of Candida albicans by probiotic BACTERIUM – PEDIOCOCCUS acidilactici,” Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Arendrup and T. F. Patterson, “Multidrug-resistant Candida: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and treatment,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 216, Supplement_3, pp. S445–S451, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Krause, E. Schwab, D. Bachhiesl et al., “Role of Candida in antibiotic-associated diarrhea,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 184, no. 8, pp. 1065–1069, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. F. Florescu and U. Sandkovsky, “Fungal infections in intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients,” Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 295–302, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Aslam, C. Rotstein, and AST Infectious Disease Community of Practice, “Candida infections in solid organ transplantation: guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice,” Clinical Transplantation, vol. 33, no. 9, article e13623, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Vallabhaneni, A. A. Cleveland, M. M. Farley, L. H. Harrison, W. Schaffner, Z. G. Beldavs et al., Epidemiology and risk factors for echinocandin nonsusceptible Candida glabrata bloodstream infections: data from a large multisite population-based candidemia surveillance program, 2008–2014. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press, 2015.
H. Sogawa, G. Costa, S. Armanyous et al., “Twenty years of gut transplantation for chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction: technical innovation, long-term outcome, quality of life, and disease recurrence,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 273, no. 2, pp. 325–333, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Praneenararat, “The first reported case of colonic infection caused by Candida tropicalis and a review of the literature,” Case Reports in Gastroenterology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 199–205, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Arfa, D. Harrell, A. Suman, and J. L. Kresak, Candida krusei-induced colitis: a rare opportunistic infection.
J. Fortún, P. Martín-Dávila, M. Montejo et al., “Prophylaxis with caspofungin for invasive fungal infections in high-risk liver transplant recipients,” Transplantation, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 424–435, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Pappas, F. P. Silveira, and the AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice, “Candida in solid organ transplant recipients,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 9, pp. S173–S179, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fishman, “Infection in organ transplantation,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 856–879, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Arendrup, N. Friberg, M. Mares et al., “How to interpret MICs of antifungal compounds according to the revised clinical breakpoints v. 10.0 European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing (EUCAST),” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1464–1472, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Garcia-Rubio, H. C. de Oliveira, J. Rivera, and N. Trevijano-Contador, “The fungal cell wall: Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus species,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10, p. 2993, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. D. Alexander, M. D. Johnson, C. D. Pfeiffer et al., “Increasing echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata: clinical failure correlates with presence of FKS mutations and elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 1724–1732, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Farmakiotis, J. Tarrand, and D. Kontoyiannis, “Application of the combined CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints for azole and echinocandin susceptibilities of Candida isolates in a tertiary cancer center: the emerging threat of multidrug resistance,” in Book of Abstracts of the 12th ASM Conference on Candida and Candidiasis, New Orleans, LA, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Astvad, H. Johansen, B. Røder et al., “Update from a 12-year nationwide fungemia surveillance: increasing intrinsic and acquired resistance causes concern,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 4, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. W. Fothergill, D. A. Sutton, D. I. McCarthy, and N. P. Wiederhold, “Impact of new antifungal breakpoints on antifungal resistance in Candida species,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 994–997, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wisplinghoff, J. Ebbers, L. Geurtz et al., “Nosocomial bloodstream infections due to _Candida_ spp. in the USA: species distribution, clinical features and antifungal susceptibilities,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 78–81, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. K. Shields, M. H. Nguyen, E. G. Press, and C. J. Clancy, “Abdominal candidiasis is a hidden reservoir of echinocandin resistance,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 7601–7605, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Grau, S. Luque, N. Campillo et al., “Plasma and peritoneal fluid population pharmacokinetics of micafungin in post-surgical patients with severe peritonitis,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 2854–2861, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. R. Healey et al., “The gastrointestinal tract is a major source of echinocandin drug resistance in a murine model of Candida glabrata colonization and systemic dissemination,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 61, no. 12, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Jensen, H. Johansen, L. Søes et al., “Posttreatment antifungal resistance among colonizing Candida isolates in candidemia patients: results from a systematic multicenter study,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1500–1508, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. P. Wiederhold, L. K. Najvar, R. Jaramillo et al., “Oral glucan synthase inhibitor SCY-078 is effective in an experimental murine model of invasive candidiasis caused by WT and echinocandin-resistant Candida glabrata,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 448–451, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Bader, E. A. Lakota, S. Flanagan et al., “Overcoming the resistance hurdle: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment analyses for rezafungin (CD101) against Candida albicans and Candida glabrata,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 62, no. 6, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Zahra Zareshahrabadi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3564

Downloads

615

Citations