Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Urology
Volume 2013, Article ID 810590, 4 pages
Case Report

Renal Cell Carcinoma Associated with Xp11.2 Translocation/TFE3 Gene Fusion: A Rare Case Report with Review of the Literature

Department of Urology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala 682041, India

Received 29 October 2013; Accepted 24 November 2013

Academic Editors: A. Goel and P. M. Pierorazio

Copyright © 2013 Puneet Ahluwalia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Argani and M. Ladanyi, “Renal carcinomas associated with Xp11. 2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions,” in Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs (World Health Organization Classification of Tumours), J. N. Eble, G. Sauter, J. I. Epstein et al., Eds., pp. 37–38, IARC, Lyon, France, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  2. P. Argani and M. Ladanyi, “Translocation carcinomas of the kidney,” Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 363–378, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. C. Mir, E. Trilla, I. M. De Torres et al., “Altered transcription factor E3 expression in unclassified adult renal cell carcinoma indicates adverse pathological features and poor outcome,” BJU International, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. E71–E76, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. G. Malouf, P. Camparo, S. Oudard et al., “Targeted agents in metastatic Xp11 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion renal cell carcinoma (RCC): a report from the Juvenile RCC Network,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1834–1838, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Zachary, T. Alexander, O. B. Jason, M. D. Jeffrey, and K. T. Martha, “Adult Xp11 translocation associated renal cell carcinoma: time to recognize,” Urology, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 965–968, 2012. View at Google Scholar