Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Urology
Volume 2013, Article ID 826748, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/826748
Case Report

Failure of Urological Implants in Spinal Cord Injury Patients due to Infection, Malfunction, and Implants Becoming Obsolete due to Medical Progress and Age-Related Changes in Human Body Making Implant Futile: Report of Three Cases

1Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport and Formby District General Hospital, Town Lane, Southport PR8 6PN, UK
2Department of Urology, Southport and Formby District General Hospital, Town Lane, Southport PR8 6PN, UK
3Department of Radiology, Southport and Formby District General Hospital, Town Lane, Southport PR8 6PN, UK
4Department of Cellular Pathology, Southport and Formby District General Hospital, Town Lane, Southport PR8 6PN, UK

Received 10 March 2013; Accepted 10 June 2013

Academic Editors: C. Liao and N. Mondaini

Copyright © 2013 Subramanian Vaidyanathan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, “Regulation of medical implants in the EU and UK,” Fifth Report of Session 2012-13, Authority of the House of Commons, The Stationery Office Limited, London, UK, November 2012. View at Google Scholar
  2. P. G. Carter, A. D. Joyce, I. K. Dickinson, D. A. Packham, J. P. Pryor, and G. S. Brindley, “A drug delivery system for treating erectile impotence: a preliminary communication,” Journal of Andrology, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 70S, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. M. Murphy, D. Rea, J. O'Mahony et al., “A comparison of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter between cases with and without an underlying neurogenic aetiology,” Irish Journal of Medical Science, vol. 172, no. 3, pp. 136–138, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Kutzenberger, “Surgical therapy of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (hyperreflexia) in paraplegic patients by sacral deafferentation and implant driven micturition by sacral anterior root stimulation: methods, indications, results, complications, and future prospects,” Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplementum, no. 97, part 1, pp. 333–339, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Clark, T. Ngo, C. V. Comiter, R. Anderson, and W. Kennedy, “Sacral nerve stimulator revision due to somatic growth,” Journal of Urology, vol. 186, supplement 4, pp. 1576–1580, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. N. Kabalin, J. Rosen, and I. Perkash, “Penile advancement and lengthening in spinal cord injury patients with retracted phallus who have failed penile prosthesis placement alone,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 144, no. 2, part 1, pp. 316–318, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. K. Montague, “Artificial urinary sphincter: long-term results and patient satisfaction,” Advances in Urology, vol. 2012, Article ID 835290, 4 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. P. Kim, Z. Sarmast, S. Daignault, G. J. Faerber, E. J. McGuire, and J. M. Latini, “Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan,” Journal of Urology, vol. 179, no. 5, pp. 1912–1916, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus