Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Urology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 687965, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/687965
Case Report

Delayed Migration of Embolized Coil with Large Renal Stone Formation: A Rare Presentation

Department of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India

Received 17 July 2014; Accepted 29 November 2014; Published 24 December 2014

Academic Editor: Apul Goel

Copyright © 2014 Santosh Kumar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Fernstrom and B. Johansson, “Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique,” Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 257–259, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. M. Al-Kohlany, A. A. Shokeir, A. Mosbah et al., “Treatment of complete staghorn stones: a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 173, no. 2, pp. 469–473, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Labate, P. Modi, A. Timoney et al., “The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications,” Journal of Endourology, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1275–1280, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. L. Stoller, J. S. Wolf Jr., and M. A. St. Lezin, “Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 152, no. 6, part 1, pp. 1977–1981, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. W. Segura, D. E. Patterson, A. J. LeRoy et al., “Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 134, no. 6, pp. 1077–1081, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Gallucci, P. Fortunato, M. Schettini, and A. Vincenzoni, “Management of hemorrhage after percutaneous renal surgery,” Journal of Endourology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 509–512, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Santosh, J. Kumar, A. S. Sriharsha, S. K. Singh, and S. Agrawal, “Page kidney secondary to large splenic artery aneurysm bleeding and its management by angioembolization,” Nephro-Urology Monthly, vol. 6, no. 3, Article ID e17144, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. V. P. Chuang, S. Wallace, C. Gianturco, and C. S. Soo, “Complications of coil embolization: prevention and management,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 137, no. 4, pp. 809–813, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Rutchik and P. Wong, “Migration of arterial embolization coils as nidus for renal stone formation,” Journal of Urology, vol. 167, no. 6, p. 2520, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P.-H. Savoie, T. Lafolie, C. Gabaudan et al., “Late complication of selective renal arterial embolization after percutaneous surgery: renal colic,” Progrès en Urologie, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 869–871, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Reed, R. Suri, and R. Marcovich, “Passage of embolization coil through urinary collecting system one year after embolization,” Urology, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1222.e17–1222.e18, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Kumar, R. Ganesamoni, B. Nanjappa, and V. Sharma, “Fragmented pigtail percutaneous nephrostomy tubes: etiology and management,” Korean Journal of Urology, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 492–496, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus