Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Urology
Volume 2017, Article ID 5980697, 3 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5980697
Case Report

Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy after High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Failure

Department of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to David B. Samadi; moc.liamg@etutitsnicitoboridamas

Received 21 June 2016; Accepted 25 December 2016; Published 24 January 2017

Academic Editor: Beatrice Detti

Copyright © 2017 Leon Telis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. B. Ryerson, C. R. Eheman, S. F. Altekruse et al., “Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2012, featuring the increasing incidence of liver cancer,” Cancer, vol. 122, no. 9, pp. 1312–1337, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. H. U. Ahmed, O. Akin, J. A. Coleman et al., “Transatlantic consensus group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer,” BJU International, vol. 109, no. 11, pp. 1636–1647, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. G. Chaussy and S. F. Thüroff, “Robotic high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: what have we learned in 15 years of clinical use?” Current Urology Reports, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 180–187, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Chaussy, S. Thüroff, X. Rebillard, and A. Gelet, “Technology insight: high-intensity focused ultrasound for urologic cancers,” Nature Clinical Practice Urology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 191–198, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. R. Cooperberg, J. M. Broering, P. W. Kantoff, and P. R. Carroll, “Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 178, no. 3, pp. S14–S19, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. T. Shah, V. Kasivisvanathan, C. Jameson, A. Freeman, M. Emberton, and H. U. Ahmed, “Histological outcomes after focal high-intensity focused ultrasound and cryotherapy,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 955–964, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Thüroff, C. Chaussy, G. Vallancien et al., “High-intensity focused ultrasound and localized prostate cancer: efficacy results from the European multicentric study,” Journal of Endourology / Endourological Society, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 673–677, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Lawrentschuk, A. Finelli, T. H. Van der Kwast et al., “Salvage radical prostatectomy following primary high intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of prostate cancer,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 862–868, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Mearini, L. D'Urso, D. Collura, E. Nunzi, G. Muto, and M. Porena, “High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective trial with long-term follow-up,” Scandinavian Journal of Urology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 267–274, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. G. Murphy, J. Pedersen, and A. J. Costello, “Salvage robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy following failed primary high-intensity focussed ultrasound treatment for localised prostate cancer,” Journal of Robotic Surgery, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 201–203, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. Leonardo, G. Franco, C. De Nunzio et al., “Salvage laparoscopic radical prostatectomy following high-intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of prostate cancer,” Urology, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 130–133, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus