Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Letter to the Editor
Case Reports in Vascular Medicine
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 4691275, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4691275
Case Report

Failure of the Pipeline Embolization Device in Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms Associated with a Fetal Posterior Cerebral Artery

1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
2Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, 901 Walnut Street, 3rd floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
4Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06519, USA

Received 15 October 2015; Revised 21 January 2016; Accepted 28 February 2016

Academic Editor: Boris Krischek

Copyright © 2016 Mario Zanaty et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Zanaty, N. Chalouhi, S. I. Tjoumakaris, R. H. Rosenwasser, L. F. Gonzalez, and P. Jabbour, “Flow-diversion panacea or poison?” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 5, article 21, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Zanaty, N. Chalouhi, R. M. Starke et al., “Flow diversion versus conventional treatment for carotid cavernous aneurysms,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 2656–2661, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Zanaty, N. Chalouhi, G. Barros et al., “Flow-diversion for ophthalmic segment aneurysms,” Neurosurgery, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 286–289, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N. Chalouhi, M. Zanaty, A. Whiting et al., “Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device,” Neurosurgery, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 165–172, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Rangel-Castilla, M. C. Cress, S. A. Munich et al., “Feasibility, safety, and periprocedural complications of pipeline embolization for intracranial aneurysm treatment under conscious sedation,” Neurosurgery, vol. 11, pp. 426–430, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. K. K. Bisaria, “Anomalies of the posterior communicating artery and their potential clinical significance,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 572–576, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Horikoshi, I. Akiyama, Z. Yamagata, M. Sugita, and H. Nukui, “Magnetic resonance angiographic evidence of sex-linked variations in the circle of willis and the occurrence of cerebral aneurysms,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 697–703, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Golshani, A. Ferrell, A. Zomorodi, T. P. Smith, and G. W. Britz, “A review of the management of posterior communicating artery aneurysms in the modern era,” Surgical Neurology International, vol. 1, article 88, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. W. He, J. Hauptman, L. Pasupuleti et al., “True posterior communicating artery aneurysms: are they more prone to rupture? A biomorphometric analysis: clinical article,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 611–615, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Zada, J. Breault, C. Y. Liu et al., “Internal carotid artery aneurysms occurring at the origin of fetal variant posterior cerebral arteries: surgical and endovascular experience,” Neurosurgery, vol. 63, no. 1, supplement 1, pp. ONS55–ONS62, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Ryttlefors, P. Enblad, R. S. C. Kerr, and A. J. Molyneux, “International subarachnoid aneurysm trial of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling: subgroup analysis of 278 elderly patients,” Stroke, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 2720–2726, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Raymond, F. Guilbert, A. Weill et al., “Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils,” Stroke, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1398–1403, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. M. Heiferman, J. T. Billingsley, M. K. Kasliwal et al., “Use of flow-diverting stents as salvage treatment following failed stent-assisted embolization of intracranial aneurysms,” Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. K. M. Fargen, G. J. Velat, M. F. Lawson, J. Mocco, and B. L. Hoh, “Review of reported complications associated with the pipeline embolization device,” World Neurosurgery, vol. 77, no. 3-4, pp. 403–404, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. D. Bodily, H. J. Cloft, G. Lanzino, D. J. Fiorella, P. M. White, and D. F. Kallmes, “Stent-assisted coiling in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a qualitative, Systematic review of the literature,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1232–1236, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Shapiro, J. Babb, T. Becske, and P. K. Nelson, “Safety and efficacy of adjunctive balloon remodeling during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a literature review,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1777–1781, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus