Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Canadian Respiratory Journal
Volume 15 (2008), Issue 4, Pages 193-198
Original Article

Effect of Fluticasone 250 μg/salmeterol 50 μg and Montelukast on Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Asthmatic Patients

Arthur F Gelb,1 Colleen Flynn Taylor,2 Chris M Shinar,3 Carlos A Gutierrez,4 and Noe Zamel4

1Division of Pulmonary Services, Department of Medicine, Lakewood Regional Medical Center, and Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
2Independent contractor, Canada
3Department of Pharmacy Services, Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center, Fountain Valley, California, USA
4Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Copyright © 2008 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


BACKGROUND: Monitoring noninvasive biomarkers of inflammation is an important adjunct in asthma therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to identify airway and alveolar site(s) of inflammation using exhaled nitric oxide (NO) as a marker in asthmatic patients, and to evaluate the NO response to maintenance fluticasone 250 μg/salmeterol 50 μg (F/S) and add-on montelukast 10 mg (M).

METHODS: Thirty (24 women) nonsmoking, mild to moderate asthmatic patients were studied, mean age (± SD) 43±9 years, treated with F/S for more than one year. All were clinically stable for longer than eight weeks and had not taken oral corticosteroids and/or leukotriene antagonists for eight weeks before the present study. Spirometry, Juniper asthma symptom score, fractional exhaled NO (FENO) 100 mL/s, bronchial NO and alveolar NO concentration (CANO) were measured in a single-blind, nonrandomized crossover study.

PROTOCOL: Visit 1: baseline F/S; visit 2: after four weeks of F/S plus M; visit 3: after four weeks of S plus M; and visit 4: after four weeks of S only. Values in asthmatic patients were also compared with 34 nonsmoking age-matched healthy controls with normal lung function.

RESULTS: After 180 μg aerosolized metered dose inhaler albuterol, the forced expiratory volume in 1 s at baseline was 2.6±0.8 L (86%±16% of the predicted value) and the forced expiratory volume in 1 s over the forced vital capacity was 77%±9% (mean ± SD), and was similar at visits 2 to 4. Juniper scores were mildly abnormal at visits 1 to 3, but significantly worse (P=0.03) at visit 4 versus visits 1 to 3. FENO values at visits 1 to 3 were similar but significantly increased (P=0.007) at visit 4. Bronchial NO was higher (P=0.03) at visit 4, versus visits 1 and 2, and was no different at visit 3. Compared with the healthy subjects, FENO and bronchial NO values were abnormal (greater than the normal mean plus 2 SD) in 33% of asthmatic patients at visits 1 to 3. CANO was similar for visits 1 to 4. CANO was abnormal (greater than the normal mean + 2 SD) in 20% of asthmatic patients.

CONCLUSION: In clinically stable asthmatic patients, despite controller treatment including moderate-dose inhaled corticosteroids and add-on M, 33% of mild to moderate asthmatic patients have ongoing nonsuppressed bronchial sites of increased NO production, compared with healthy control subjects. These controllers have no effect on CANO, which was abnormal in 20% of the asthmatic patients studied. The addition of add-on M to baseline moderate-dose inhaled corticosteroid did not further reduce total exhaled, bronchial and/or alveolar NO production.