Research Article

Contemporaneous International Asthma Guidelines Present Differing Recommendations: An Analysis

Table 4

CTS guideline.

Grade of recommendation/descriptionBenefit versus risk and burdensMethodological quality of supporting evidenceImplications

1A/strong recommendation, high-quality evidenceBenefits clearly outweigh risk and burdens or vice versaRCTs without important limitations or overwhelming evidence from observational studiesStrong recommendation; it can apply to most patients in most circumstances without reservation

1B/strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidenceBenefits clearly outweigh risk and burdens or vice versaRCTs with important limitations (inconsistent results, methodological flaws, indirect or imprecise) or exceptionally strong evidence from observational studiesStrong recommendation; it can apply to most patients in most circumstances without reservation

IC/strong recommendation, low-quality, or very low-quality evidenceBenefits clearly outweigh risk and burdens or vice versaObservational studies or case seriesStrong recommendation, but it may change when higher quality evidence becomes available

2A/weak recommendation, high-quality evidenceBenefits closely balanced with risks and burdenRCTs without important limitations or overwhelming evidence from observational studiesWeak recommendation; its best action may differ depending on circumstances and patients’ or social values

2B/weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidenceBenefits closely balanced with risks and burdenRCTs with important limitations (inconsistent results, methodological flaws, indirect or imprecise) or exceptionally strong evidence from observational studiesWeak recommendation; its best action may differ depending on circumstances and patients’ or social values

2C/weak recommendation, low-quality, or very low-quality evidenceUncertainty in the estimates of benefits, risks, and burden; benefits, risk, and burden may be closely balancedObservational studies or case seriesVery weak recommendations; other alternatives may be equally reasonable