Research Article

A National Survey of Mentoring Practices for Young Investigators in Circulatory and Respiratory Health

Table 3

Participant appraisal of current mentoring practices.

Mentorship practices⁢Clinician versus nonclinician⁢Career stage Total ()
Nonclinician ()Clinician ()M.S. ()Ph.D. ()Postdoctoral ()New investigator ()

Personal attributes of mentor with most significant impact on training, no. rated as “excellent” or “very good,” %
 Approachable82.984.484.285.785.583.383.1
 Altruistic/generous67.580.073.771.470.988.970.3
 Enthusiastic94.693.384.291.189.194.486.6
 Compassionate68.377.873.769.672.783.370.3
 Nonjudgmental68.366.778.971.467.372.268.0
 Patient72.471.173.776.872.777.872.1
 Honest/sincere82.184.478.987.585.588.982.6
 Reliable74.877.873.776.880.083.375.6
Actions and behaviour of mentor with most significant impact on training, %
 Accessible82.180.078.983.983.683.382.0
 Actively listens82.186.784.285.787.383.381.4
 Provides moral support71.564.463.275.076.461.165.7
 Addresses personal issues48.048.947.451.858.238.964.0
 Assists in defining/reaching goals63.477.873.771.470.966.762.8
 Acts as a role model82.184.478.987.587.383.382.6
 Assists in skills development74.077.873.780.478.277.875.0
 Monitors career progression67.568.968.476.867.366.768.0
 Assists in navigating the institution54.566.757.958.952.772.257.6
 Facilitates networking61.873.357.964.369.166.764.5
Participant feels he/she is in the driver’s seat in regard to current mentoring, %
 Yes68.368.968.471.463.677.868.6
 No28.526.731.623.232.722.227.9
 Missing3.34.40.05.43.60.03.5
Current mentoring program meets the needs of the participant, %
 Yes64.264.489.558.965.566.765.1
 No34.133.310.539.334.533.333.1
 Missing1.62.20.01.80.00.01.7
Participant would choose the same mentor again, %
 Yes84.673.389.585.789.172.280.8
 No11.422.210.514.310.922.214.5
 Missing4.14.40.00.00.05.64.7

M.S.: Master’s student; Ph.D.: doctoral student. Stratified by clinical background and career stage so that columns are not mutually exclusive. 4 participants did not specify whether or not they were clinicians. 24 participants did not specify their career stage or marked their career stage as “other.” Within 60 months of first academic appointment.