Research Article

A National Survey of Mentoring Practices for Young Investigators in Circulatory and Respiratory Health

Table 4

Participant recommendations for improved mentoring practices.

Mentorship characteristics⁢Clinician versus nonclinician⁢Career stage Total ()
Nonclinician ()Clinician ()M.S. ()Ph.D. ()Postdoctoral ()New investigator ()

Participants with a signed agreement find it beneficial, %
 Yes52.466.660.055.644.450.055.6
 No47.633.340.044.455.650.044.4
 Missing0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Participants without a signed agreement feel it would be beneficial, %
 Yes26.530.814.331.928.337.528.2
 No70.664.185.766.069.662.570.4
 Missing2.95.10.02.12.20.01.4
Topics participants wish would be discussed that are not currently addressed, %
 Administrative17.111.110.510.721.811.115.7
 Clinical8.18.915.85.47.311.18.7
 Research11.411.110.55.414.511.111.6
 Teaching/training29.320.026.325.040.011.126.7
 Work-life balance34.126.742.142.930.911.132.0
 Career guidance36.628.936.837.540.022.233.7
 None of the above36.640.047.426.834.544.438.4

M.S.: Master’s student; Ph.D.: doctoral student. Stratified by clinical background and career stage so that columns are not mutually exclusive. 4 participants did not specify whether or not they were clinicians. 24 participants did not specify their career stage or marked their career stage as “other.” Within 60 months of first academic appointment. ⁢ = 27. ⁢.