Research Article

Clinical Significance of the Relationship between Progression-Free Survival or Postprogression Survival and Overall Survival in Patients with Extensive Disease-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Carboplatin plus Etoposide

Table 3

Univariate Cox regression analysis of baseline patient characteristics for postprogression survival.

Factors Postprogression survival
Hazard ratio95% CI value

Gender
 Male/female1.600.84–3.370.15
Age at the beginning of first-line treatment (years)1.000.96–1.040.79
PS at the beginning of first-line treatment1.110.86–1.420.40
Number of courses of first-line treatment administered0.720.56–0.930.01
Best response at first-line treatment
 PR/non-PR0.390.22–0.71<0.05
 Non-PD/PD0.550.30–1.080.08
PS at the end of first-line treatment2.091.56–2.74<0.001
Brain metastases at initial diagnosis
 Yes/no1.040.61–1.730.88
Type of relapse
 Refractory/sensitive4.282.03–10.25<0.001
Age at the beginning of second-line treatment (years)0.990.95–1.040.90
PS at the beginning of second-line treatment2.491.59–3.92<0.001
Best response at second-line treatment
 PR/non-PR0.340.17–0.67<0.05
 Non-PD/PD0.220.09–0.56<0.05
Administration of platinum rechallenge
 Yes/no0.510.28–0.88<0.05
Administration of AMR
 Yes/no0.390.22–0.67<0.001
Administration of TOP
 Yes/no0.320.11–0.77<0.05
Reason for carboplatin + etoposide administration
 Cardiorenal dysfunction/poor PS0.820.49–1.360.44
Number of regimens administered following disease progression after the first-line chemotherapy0.360.24–0.51<0.001

95% CI: 95% confidence interval; PS: performance status; PR: partial response; PD: progressive disease; AMR: amrubicin; TOP: topotecan.
Bold values are statistically significant ().