Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Cardiology Research and Practice
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 308486, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2009/308486
Clinical Study

Pretest Score for Predicting Microbubble Contrast Agent Use in Stress Echocardiography: A Method to Increase Efficiency in the Echo Laboratory

1Cardiovascular Ultrasound Imaging Laboratory, Laval Hospital, QC, Canada G1V 4G5
2Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA

Received 3 May 2009; Accepted 16 June 2009

Academic Editor: Gerald Maurer

Copyright © 2009 Mathieu Bernier et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. L. Mulvagh, A. N. DeMaria, S. B. Feinstein et al., “Contrast echocardiography: current and future applications,” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 331–342, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  2. T. H. Marwick, J. J. Nemec, F. J. Pashkow, W. J. Stewart, and E. E. Salcedo, “Accuracy and limitations of exercise echocardiography in a routine clinical setting,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 74–81, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  3. M. R. Allen, P. A. Pellikka, H. R. Villarraga et al., “Harmonic imaging: echocardiographic enhanced contrast intensity and duration,” International Journal of Cardiac Imaging, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 215–220, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M. S. Dolan, K. Riad, A. El-Shafei et al., “Effect of intravenous contrast for left ventricular opacification and border definition on sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography compared with coronary angiography in technically difficult patients,” American Heart Journal, vol. 142, no. 5, pp. 908–915, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. P. D. Coon, J. Bednarz, and A. S. Pearlman, “Implementing contrast echocardiography in the laboratory,” Cardiology Clinics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 199–210, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. D. Waggoner, D. Ehler, D. Adams et al., “Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council on Cardiac Sonography,” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 417–420, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. Castello, J. N. Bella, A. Rovner, J. Swan, J. Smith, and L. Shaw, “Efficacy and time-efficiency of a “sonographer-driven” contrast echocardiography protocol in a high-volume echocardiography laboratory,” American Heart Journal, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 535–541, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. S. Thanigaraj, R. F. Nease Jr., K. B. Schechtman, R. L. Wade, S. Loslo, and J. E. Perez, “Use of contrast for image enhancement during stress echocardiography is cost-effective and reduces additional diagnostic testing,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 1430–1432, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. R. P. Croft, P. G. Nicholls, E. W. Steyerberg, J. H. Richardus, W. Cairns, and S. Smith, “A clinical prediction rule for nerve-function impairment in leprosy patients,” The Lancet, vol. 355, no. 9215, pp. 1603–1606, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  10. E. M. Antman, M. Cohen, P. J. L. M. Bernink et al., “The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 284, no. 7, pp. 835–842, 2000. View at Google Scholar