Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Cardiology Research and Practice
Volume 2014, Article ID 963264, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/963264
Review Article

Filters in 2D and 3D Cardiac SPECT Image Processing

11st Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Aretaieion Hospital, University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
22nd Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Aretaieion Hospital, University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece

Received 23 October 2013; Accepted 20 January 2014; Published 1 April 2014

Academic Editor: Gavin W. Lambert

Copyright © 2014 Maria Lyra et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. WHO, Global Atlas on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control, WHO, World Heart Federation, World Stroke Organization, 2011, http://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/en/.
  2. S. Agarwal, M. G. Shlipak, H. Kramer, A. Jain, and D. M. Herrington, “The association of chronic kidney disease and metabolic syndrome with incident cardiovascular events: multiethnic study of atherosclerosis,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2012, Article ID 806102, 8 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Jadvar, H. W. Strauss, and G. M. Segall, “SPECT and PET in the evaluation of coronary artery disease,” Radiographics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 915–926, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. van Laere, M. Koole, I. Lemahieu, and R. Dierckx, “Image filtering in single-photon emission computed tomography: Principles and applications,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 127–133, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. G. DePuey, D. S. Berman, and E. V. Garcia, Cardiac SPECT Imaging, Raven Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  6. G. Germano, “Technical aspects of myocardial SPECT imaging,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1499–1507, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. R. Cherry, J. A. Sorenson, and M. E. Phelps, Physics in Nuclear Medicine, Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2003.
  8. J. Qi and R. M. Leahy, “Iterative reconstruction techniques in emission computed tomography,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 51, pp. R541–R578, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. C. Lee-Tzuu, “A method for attenuation correction in radionuclide computed tomography,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 638–643, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. P. P. Bruyant, “Analytic and iterative reconstruction algorithms in SPECT,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1343–1358, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Lyra and A. Ploussi, “Filtering in SPECT image reconstruction,” International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, vol. 2011, Article ID 693795, 14 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. W. Groch and W. D. Erwin, “SPECT in the year 2000: basic principles,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 233–244, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. M. Khalil, Basic Sciences of Nuclear Medicine, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010.
  14. M. N. Salihin and A. Zakaria, “Determination of the optimum filter for qualitative and quantitative 99mTc myocardial SPECT imaging,” Iranian Journal of Radiation Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 173–182, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Sadremomtaz and P. Taherparvar, “The influence of filters on the SPECT image of Carlson phantom,” Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 291–297, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  16. Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (2012) Phantoms, Cardiac SPECT simulator, 2012, http://interactive.snm.org/index.cfm?PageID=11666.
  17. S. Synefia, M. Sotiropoulos, M. Argyrou et al., “3D sPECT myocardial volume estimation increases the reliability of perfusion diagnosis,” e-Journal of Science and Technology. In press.
  18. M. Lyra, M. Sotiropoulos, N. Lagopati, and M. Gavrilleli, “Quantification of myocardial perfusion in 3D SPECT images-stress/rest volume differences: 3D myocardium images quantification,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST '10), pp. 31–35, Thessaloniki, Greece, July 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. A. King, S. J. Glick, B. C. Penney, R. B. Schwinger, and P. W. Doherty, “Interactive visual optimization of SPECT prereconstruction filtering,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1192–1198, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. M. Links, R. W. Jeremy, S. M. Dyer, T. L. Frank, and L. C. Becker, “Wiener filtering improves quantification of regional myocardial perfusion with thallium-201 SPECT,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1230–1236, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. V. Heller, A. Mann, and R. C. Hendel, Nuclear Cardiology: Technical Applications, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2009.
  22. B. Tasdemir, T. Balci, B. Demirel, I. Karaca, A. Aydin, and Z. Koc, “Comparison of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and computed tomography (CT) angiography based on conventional coronary angiography,” Natural Science, vol. 4, pp. 976–982, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  23. S. R. Underwood, C. Anagnostopoulos, M. Cerqueira et al., “Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 261–291, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. H. Lue and F. J. Wackers, Cardiovascular Imaging, Manson Publishing, 2010.
  25. E. G. DePuey, Imaging Guidelines for Nuclear Cardiology Procedures, The American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2006.
  26. R. A. Carlson and J. T. Colvin, “Fluke Biomedical, Nuclear Associates 76–823, 76–824 & 76–825, PET/SPECT Phantom Source Tank, Phantom Inserts and Cardiac Insert,” 2006, http://www.flukebiomedical.com/Biomedical/usen/Nuclear-Medicine/Quality-Control-Phantoms/76-825.htm?PID=55292.
  27. A. Takavar, G. Shamsipour, M. Sohrabi, and M. Eftekhari, “Determination of optimum filter in myocardial SPECT: a phantom study,” Iranian Journal of Radiation Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 205–210, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  28. M. N. Salihin and A. Zakaria, “Relationship between the optimum cut off frequency for Butterworth filter and lung-heart ratio in 99mTc myocardial SPECT,” Iranian Journal of Radiation Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Rajabi, A. Rajabi, N. Yaghoobi, H. Firouzabady, and F. Rustgou, “Determination of the optimum filter function for Tc99m-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging,” Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 77–82, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  30. S. Vandenberghe, Y. D'Asseler, R. van de Walle et al., “Iterative reconstruction algorithms in nuclear medicine,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 105–111, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. G. DePuey, “Advances in SPECT camera software and hardware: currently available and new on the horizon,” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 551–581, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. L. Hatton, B. F. Hutton, S. Angelides, K. K. L. Choong, and G. Larcos, “Improved tolerance to missing data in myocardial perfusion SPET using OSEM reconstruction,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 857–861, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. R. Zakavi, A. Zonoozi, V. D. Kakhki, M. Hajizadeh, M. Momennezhad, and K. Ariana, “Image reconstruction using filtered backprojection and iterative method: effect on motion artifacts in myocardial perfusion SPECT,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 220–223, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. K. Won, E. Kim, M. Mar et al., “Is iterative reconstruction an improvement over filtered back projection in processing gated myocardial perfusion SPECT?” The Open Medical Imaging Journal, vol. 2, pp. 17–23, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  35. A. Otte, K. Audenaert, K. Peremans, K. Heeringen, and R. Dierckx, Nuclear Medicine in Psychiatry, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2004.
  36. M. Lyra, “Single photon emission tomography (SPECT) and 3D images evaluation in nuclear medicine,” in Image Processing, Y. S. Chen, Ed., InTech, 2009, http://www.intechopen.com/books/image-processing/single-photon-emission-tomography-spect-and-3d-images-evaluation-in-nuclear-medicine.
  37. A. Seret and J. Forthomme, “Comparison of different types of commercial filtered backprojection and ordered-subset expectation maximization SPECT reconstruction software,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 179–187, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. S. Lima, D. D. Watson, A. R. Goode et al., “Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 64–70, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. K. Paul and H. A. Nabi, “Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: basic principles, technical aspects, and clinical applications,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 179–187, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. P. Véra, A. Manrique, V. Pontvianne, A. Hitzel, R. Koning, and A. Cribier, “Thallium-gated SPECT in patients with major myocardial infarction: effect of filtering and zooming in comparison with equilibrium radionuclide imaging and left ventriculography,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 513–521, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. P. Y. Marie, W. Djaballah, P. R. Franken et al., “OSEM reconstruction, associated with temporal Fourier and depth-dependant resolution recovery filtering, enhances results from sestamibi and 201T1 16-Interval Gated SPECT,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1789–1795, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. T. Vakhtangandze, D. O. Hall, F. V. Zananiri, and M. R. Rees, “The effect of Butterworth and Metz reconstruction filters on volume and ejection fraction calculations with 99Tcm gated myocardial SPECT,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 78, no. 932, pp. 733–736, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. G. A. Wright, M. McDade, W. Martin, and I. Hutton, “Quantitative gated SPECT: the effect of reconstruction filter on calculated left ventricular ejection fractions and volumes,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 99–105, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. N. Trayanova, “Computational cardiology: the heart of the matter,” ISRN Cardiology, vol. 2012, Article ID 269680, 15 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar