Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Cardiology Research and Practice
Volume 2016, Article ID 7842514, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7842514
Review Article

Comparison of the Postprocedural Quality of Life between Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review

1MBBS-Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi 74100, Pakistan
2Kharadar General Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
3Cardiology, Civil Hospital, DUHS, Karachi 74100, Pakistan
4Aga Khan University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
5Department of Biological Sciences, The Lyceum, Karachi 75600, Pakistan
6The Karachi Grammar School, Karachi 75600, Pakistan

Received 2 August 2015; Accepted 4 November 2015

Academic Editor: Piera Angelica Merlini

Copyright © 2016 Kaneez Fatima et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Brorsson, S. J. Bernstein, R. H. Brook, and L. Werkö, “Quality of life of chronic stable angina patients 4 years after coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass surgery,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 47–57, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Währborg, “Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. 1-year follow-up in the coronary angioplasty versus bypass revascularization investigation (CABRI) trial,” European Heart Journal, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 653–658, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. P. Kappetein, T. E. Feldman, M. J. MacK et al., “Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial,” European Heart Journal, vol. 32, no. 17, pp. 2125–2134, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. I. Sipahi, M. H. Akay, S. Dagdelen, A. Blitz, and C. Alhan, “Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era,” JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 223–230, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. N. Hoffman, J. A. TenBrook Jr., M. P. Wolf, S. G. Pauker, D. N. Salem, and J. B. Wong, “A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomes,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1293–1304, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. The BARI Investigators, “Seven-year outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) by treatment and diabetic status,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1122–1129, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. B. King, A. S. Kosinski, R. A. Guyton, N. J. Lembo, and W. S. Weintraub, “Eight-year mortality in the Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST),” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1116–1121, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. W. Serruys, F. Unger, J. E. Sousa et al., “Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 344, no. 15, pp. 1117–1124, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. SoS Investigators, “Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 360, no. 9338, pp. 965–970, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. L. Noyez, M. J. de Jager, and A. L. P. Markou, “Quality of life after cardiac surgery: underresearched research,” Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 511–514, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Z. Zhang, E. M. Mahoney, R. H. Stables et al., “Disease-specific health status after stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery: one-year results from the Stent or Surgery trial,” Circulation, vol. 108, no. 14, pp. 1694–1700, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. A. Spertus, R. Nerella, R. Kettlekamp et al., “Risk of restenosis and health status outcomes for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery,” Circulation, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 768–773, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. M. Borkon, G. F. Muehlebach, J. House, S. P. Marso, and J. A. Spertus, “A comparison of the recovery of health status after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 1526–1530, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. S. Abdallah, K. Wang, E. A. Magnuson et al., “Quality of life after PCI vs CABG among patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease: a randomized clinical trial,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 310, no. 15, pp. 1581–1590, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. J. Cohen, B. Van Hout, P. W. Serruys et al., “Quality of life after PCI with drug-eluting stents or coronary-artery bypass surgery,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 11, pp. 1016–1026, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. T. van Domburg, J. Daemen, S. S. Pedersen et al., “Short- and long- term health related quality-of-life and anginal status after randomisation to coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: results of the Arterial Revascularisation Therapy Study (ARTS),” EuroIntervention, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 506–511, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. S. Rumsfeld, D. J. Magid, M. E. Plomondon et al., “Health-related quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass surgery in high-risk patients with medically refractory ischemia,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1732–1738, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. Szygula-Jurkiewicz, M. Zembala, K. Wilczek, R. Wojnicz, and L. Polonski, “Health related quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. 12-Month follow up,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 882–886, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. E. Favarato, W. Hueb, W. E. Boden et al., “Quality of life in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease: a comparative post hoc analyses of medical, angioplasty or surgical strategies-MASS II trial,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 364–370, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. J. Pocock, R. A. Henderson, P. Seed, T. Treasure, and J. R. Hampton, “Quality of life, employment status, and anginal symptoms after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. 3-year follow-up in the randomized intervention treatment of angina (RITA) trial,” Circulation, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 135–142, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus