Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Cardiology Research and Practice
Volume 2016, Article ID 8047340, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8047340
Research Article

Correlation between Doppler, Manual Morphometry, and Histopathology Based Morphometry of Radial Artery as a Conduit in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National Heart Institute, 49-50 Community Centre, East of Kailash, New Delhi 110065, India
2Department of Cardiology, National Heart Institute, 49-50 Community Centre, East of Kailash, New Delhi 110065, India
3Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology, National Heart Institute, 49-50 Community Centre, East of Kailash, New Delhi 110065, India
4Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India

Received 27 October 2015; Revised 28 January 2016; Accepted 8 February 2016

Academic Editor: Michael S. Wolin

Copyright © 2016 Om Prakash Yadava et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. U. Benedetto and M. Codispoti, “Age cutoff for the loss of survival benefit from use of radial artery in coronary artery bypass grafting,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 146, no. 5, pp. 1078–1085, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. F. Buxton, W. Y. Shi, J. Tatoulis, J. A. Fuller, A. Rosalion, and P. A. Hayward, “Total arterial revascularization with internal thoracic and radial artery grafts in triple-vessel coronary artery disease is associated with improved survival,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 1238–1244, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. O. P. Yadava, V. Sharma, A. Prakash et al., “Does clinical profile preclude use of radial artery as a conduit in coronary artery bypass grafting?” Journal of Clinical & Experimental Cardiology, vol. 6, article 3, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  4. P. Ruengsakulrach, R. Sinclair, M. Komeda, J. Raman, I. Gordon, and B. Buxton, “Comparative histopathology of radial artery versus internal thoracic artery and risk factors for development of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis,” Circulation, vol. 100, article e139, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Ruengsakulrach, M. Brooks, R. Sinclair, D. Hare, I. Gordon, and B. Buxton, “Prevalence and prediction of calcification and plaques in radial artery grafts by ultrasound,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 398–399, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. H. Chester, A. J. Marchbank, J. A. A. Borland, M. H. Yacoub, and D. P. Taggart, “Comparison of the morphologic and vascular reactivity of the proximal and distal radial artery,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1972–1976, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. I. Wendelhag, O. Wiklund, and J. Wikstrand, “Arterial wall thickness in familial hypercholesterolemia. Ultrasound measurement of intima-media thickness in the common carotid artery,” Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 70–77, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. H. O'Leary, J. F. Polak, R. A. Kronmal et al., “Distribution and correlates of sonographically detected carotid artery disease in the cardiovascular health study,” Stroke, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1752–1760, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. L. Bots, P. G. H. Mulder, A. Hofman, G.-A. van Es, and D. E. Grobbee, “Reproducibility of carotid vessel wall thickness measurements. the rotterdam study,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 921–930, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Pola, M. Serricchio, R. Flore, E. Manasse, A. Favuzzi, and G. F. Possati, “Safe removal of the radial artery for myocardial revascularization: a doppler study to prevent ischemic complications to the hand,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 737–744, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. O. Kim, J. I. Kim, Y. M. Ku et al., “Accuracy of Doppler ultrasonography in measuring radial artery wall thickness in hemodialysis patients: comparison with histologic examination,” Hemodialysis International, vol. 8, no. 1, article 80, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. A. Bhan, V. Gupta, S. K. Choudhary et al., “Radial artery in CABG: could the early results be comparable to internal mammary artery graft?” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1631–1636, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Ueyama, G. Watanabe, K. Kotoh et al., “Pathological examination of radial artery—as a graft material for coronary artery bypass grafting,” Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1816–1820, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. O. P. Yadava, A. K. Dinda, B. K. Mohanty, R. Mishra, V. Ahlawat, and A. Kundu, “Is radial artery Doppler scanning mandatory for use as coronary bypass conduit?” Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 822–827, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar