Review Article
Automated Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease: A Review and Workflow
Table 3
Review of state-of-the-art classifiers and their effectiveness.
| Work | Feature set | Classifiers | Effectiveness |
| [8] | A | Optimized SVM | Accuracy = 99.2% Sensitivity = 98.43% Specificity = 100% | [66] | B | NN | Accuracy = 88.4% | [10] | A | KNN | Accuracy = 96.8% Sensitivity = 100% Specificity = 93.7% | [9] | A | LS-SVM | Accuracy = 99.7% Sensitivity = 99.6% Specificity = 99.8% | [27] | A | SVM | Accuracy = 79.71% | [7] | A | LS-SVM | Accuracy = 100% | [19] | B | Fuzzy rule | Accuracy = 84% Sensitivity = 79% Specificity = 89% | [32] | B | Fuzzy rule | Accuracy = 92.8% | [58] | B | Fuzzy rule | Accuracy = 81.2% | [67] | B | Fuzzy rule and ensemble classifier | Accuracy = 84.44% | [55] | A | Random forest | Sensitivity = 80% Specificity = 90% | [44] | A | SVM with RBF | Sensitivity = 73% Specificity = 87% | [45] | A | SVM | Sensitivity = 85% Specificity = 78% |
|
|