Research Article

Expiratory Flow Limitation at Different Exercise Intensities in Coronary Artery Disease

Table 2

Clinical data of groups with coronary artery disease.

RMI (n = 8)LMI (n = 12)CAD (n = 9)

Time of MI, days36 ± 14512 ± 320
Cardiac function
 LVEF, %65.9 ± 6.168.8 ± 8.870.4 ± 10.0
Type of treatment, n (%)
 Chemical reperfusion1 (12.5)1 (8.3)
 Mechanical reperfusion6 (75.0)10 (83.4)
 Only standard medication1 (12.5)1 (8.3)9 (100)
Number of vessels with stenosis, n (%)Pre (n = 8)Post (n = 8)Pre (n = 12)Post (n = 12)
 Without stenosis1 (12.5)5 (62.5)05 (41.7)0
 One vessel02 (25.0)5 (41.7)3 (25.0)7 (77.8)
 Two vessels or more7 (87.5)1 (12.5)7 (58.3)4 (33.3)2 (22.2)
Location of stenosis, n (%)Pre (n = 7)Post (n = 3)Pre (n = 12)Post (n = 7)
 Anterior descending artery7 (100)2 (66.7)7 (58.3)0#8 (88.9)
 Left circumflex artery4 (57.1)2 (66.7)8 (66.7)6 (85.7)1 (11.1)
 Right coronary artery4 (57.1)05 (41.7)3 (42.8)2 (22.2)
 Diagonal arteries1 (14.3)1 (33.3)3 (25.0)3 (42.8)0
 Marginal arteries1 (14.3)02 (16.7)1 (12.5)0

Data are presented as mean ± SD or absolute value (percentage) of occurrence. RMI, recent myocardial infarction group; LMI, late myocardial infarction group; CAD, stable coronary artery disease group; n, number of individuals; MI, myocardial infarction; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; Pre, pretreatment; Post, posttreatment. Significant difference in relation to CAD. +Significant difference in relation to RMI. #Significant difference in relation to pretreatment (). The chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used.